Savage Fencing Club - Savage, MD, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SNYDER IV William B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 82% | |
| 2 | WHEELER Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 66% |
| 3 | KENYON Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 11% | |
| 3 | KENYON Jacob | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 56% | |
| 5 | EVANS Grant | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 17% | |
| 6 | WHITE Myles | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 11% |
| 7 | RIVERA RIVERA Christian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 79% | 45% | 12% |
| 8 | BEREKNYEI Thomas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 89% | 53% | 12% | |
| 9 | COFFEY Jacob | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
| 10 | DISIMONE David Z. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 22% |
| 11 | TIRRELL Justin J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 25% | |
| 12 | GAMBINO Robert A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 88% | 13% | |
| 13 | BUCCELLATO Joel S. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 33% | 6% | |
| 14 | TANG Justin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 83% | 37% | 8% | 1% |
| 15 | MAGUIRE Timothy | 100% | 100% | 94% | 57% | 2% | - | |
| 16 | FOREST Sung | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 10% | |
| 17 | CANDELARIA Armando | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 12% | 1% | |
| 18 | SHELLY Emery | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 57% | 15% | 1% |
| 19 | MILLIGAN Lauren M. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 40% | 4% | - | |
| 20 | MURPHY Megan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 72% | 24% | 3% | - |
| 21 | RAWSON Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% | 34% | 4% | |
| 22 | DOLBOW Trevor | 100% | 98% | 81% | 39% | 9% | 1% | |
| 23 | MOAKLER Christopher | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 10% | |
| 24 | KOOB Julian | 100% | 98% | 61% | 6% | - | - | |
| 25 | BOWIE Charlotta | 100% | 99% | 74% | 29% | 5% | - | - |
| 26 | WOOLF Fredrika | 100% | 100% | 94% | 64% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 27 | TAYLOR Robert | 100% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 28 | SAMPAIO Beatriz | 100% | 79% | 11% | - | - | - | |
| 29 | MOLINA Rommel | 100% | 80% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
| 30 | TAN Theodore | 100% | 56% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
| 31 | PETERSON Christopher | 100% | 98% | 78% | 40% | 11% | 1% | |
| 32 | BERGMANN Beatrix | 100% | 90% | 45% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | ECKENROAD Hannah | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 34 | FONS Amandine | 100% | 78% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 35 | FONS Jennifer | 100% | 32% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 36 | NESTERUK Hope | 100% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 37 | MORTLEY Marissa | 100% | 74% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | PAWTAN Carly | 100% | 36% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.