Palm Springs Convention Center - Palm Springs, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TAO Jiemi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% |
| 2 | SUN Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 28% |
| 3 | MAZAHERI John | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 49% |
| 3 | ZHANG William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 37% | |
| 5 | HUANG Owen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 27% | |
| 6 | LI Mason | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 14% | |
| 7 | ZHANG Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 33% | 6% |
| 8 | TIKHONOV Aleksandr | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 41% | 10% | 1% |
| 9 | ZENG Cayden | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 37% | 7% | |
| 10 | LOZANO Koen Alexander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 34% | 4% |
| 11 | CHEN Dante | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 71% | 28% | |
| 12 | YU Ethan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 20% | |
| 13 | HO Kasper | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 23% | |
| 14 | CHANG Owen | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 22% | 3% |
| 15 | XU Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 50% | 11% |
| 16 | HUANG Aaron Jingyuan | 100% | 99% | 80% | 39% | 9% | 1% | |
| 17 | LI Yunze | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 29% | |
| 18 | ZHANG alex | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% | 4% |
| 20 | ROSOWSKY Phoenix | 100% | 100% | 94% | 61% | |||
| 21 | MENG Andy | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 7% | |
| 22 | BAGWELL Theodore | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 17% | 3% | |
| 23 | LIN Evan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 31% | 6% | |
| 24 | MENG Eric | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 9% | |
| 25 | LEE Elliot | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 18% | 2% | |
| 26 | CREMEL Louis | 100% | 65% | 18% | 1% | |||
| 27 | LIU Jordan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 11% | 1% |
| 28 | ZHANG Bryant | 100% | 88% | 47% | 7% | |||
| 29 | XU Benjamin | 100% | 91% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 30 | YIN Luke | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 23% | 3% | |
| 31 | DONG YIKUN | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 17% | 2% | |
| 32 | WANG Theodore | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 23% | 4% |
| 33 | DOMANTAY Dylan | 100% | 91% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 34 | CHANG Hayden | 100% | 89% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 35 | WU William | 100% | 95% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 36 | SANGANI Niam | 100% | 99% | 87% | 51% | 15% | 2% | |
| 37 | CHUNG Lucas | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 20% | 3% | |
| 38 | HE Andrew | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 39 | VIVAS Greyson | 100% | 96% | 73% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 40 | FAZIO Lorenzo | 100% | 95% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 1% | |
| 42 | BROD Baylin | 100% | 92% | 63% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 43 | SASOMSUP Kaison | 100% | 92% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 44 | YUAN Vincent | 100% | 98% | 76% | 34% | 7% | 1% | |
| 45 | GONG Luke | 100% | 81% | 34% | 4% | |||
| 46 | TU William | 100% | 95% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 1% | |
| 47 | NACU Andre | 100% | 74% | 29% | 5% | - | - | |
| 48 | WU Kangdi | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 49 | FUNG Andrew | 100% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 50 | LU Nathan | 100% | 79% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | HUANG Jeremy Jingcai | 100% | 83% | 44% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | SIN Chad | 100% | 72% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
| 53 | MALPICA Tao | 100% | 76% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 54 | CHEN Alwyn | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 55 | SHAO Vincent li | 100% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 55 | DING Jason | 100% | 44% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 57 | OH Aaron | 100% | 92% | 62% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.