San Francisco, CA - San Francisco, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | NAGIMOV Marsel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 74% |
| 2 | BANERJEE Anup | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 89% | |
| 3 | ZENG Lucas H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | |
| 3 | ZHANG Luke T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 33% | |
| 5 | LIN Dashiell | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 34% | |
| 5 | JEON Caleb A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 59% | |
| 7 | JAYASEKARA Hiran H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 37% | |
| 8 | SOMERS Sean | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 14% | |
| 9 | TSANG Matthew K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 34% |
| 10 | DANKAR Neel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 39% | |
| 11 | LO Conrad | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% | 34% | |
| 12 | NG Eben S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% | 30% |
| 13 | WONG Nicholas A. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 25% | 4% | |
| 14 | LIM Charles Q. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 34% | 2% | |
| 15 | TSAY Jeremy M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% | 30% | |
| 16 | DETERING Julian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 37% | 6% |
| 17 | HOBSON Aaron K. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 18 | HOU Kenneth | 100% | 97% | 80% | 43% | 11% | 1% | |
| 19 | LAI Christopher W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% | 12% | |
| 20 | MASCARI DUMONT Alexandre | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 25% | 3% | |
| 21 | MILLER Duncan R. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 44% | 10% | |
| 22 | CHEN Bryce | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% | 5% |
| 23 | HUANG Bernard | 100% | 100% | 94% | 64% | 19% | 2% | |
| 24 | KHER Roan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 37% | 7% | |
| 25 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | 100% | 98% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% | |
| 26 | MU Jeffrey | 100% | 98% | 77% | 33% | 6% | - | - |
| 27 | HE Bu Wei O. | 100% | 97% | 78% | 37% | 7% | - | |
| 28 | MASCARI DUMONT Louis | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 31% | 6% | |
| 29 | UPENDER Sky | 100% | 87% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 30 | UZGIRIS Kovas | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 13% | 1% | |
| 31 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 36% | 7% | |
| 32 | CHOPRA Rohan A. | 100% | 50% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 33 | HARRIS Otto | 100% | 82% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 34 | CHUANG Kian J. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 49% | 13% | 1% | |
| 35 | BAO Aaron | 100% | 96% | 71% | 32% | 7% | 1% | |
| 36 | WILT Daniel E. | 100% | 98% | 80% | 44% | 13% | 1% | |
| 37 | TANG Adrian | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% | 10% | - | |
| 38 | BARTELS Milo | 100% | 88% | 45% | 8% | - | - | |
| 38 | YEE Johnathan | 100% | 94% | 68% | 30% | 6% | - | |
| 40 | FINNEY Lorenz | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 23% | 1% | |
| 41 | BELANGER Jackson | 100% | 86% | 47% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 42 | WOO Christian | 100% | 95% | 72% | 33% | 7% | - | |
| 43 | CRACRAFT John R. | 100% | 90% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 44 | AIKEN Nicholas A. | 100% | 97% | 77% | 35% | 6% | - | - |
| 45 | HOSKERI Anik S. | 100% | 97% | 72% | 27% | 3% | - | - |
| 46 | ZENG Chuyi | 100% | 95% | 65% | 22% | 2% | - | - |
| 47 | KIM Ryan Y. | 100% | 91% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 48 | WONG Louis | 100% | 71% | 24% | 3% | - | - | |
| 50 | LIN Richard | 100% | 59% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
| 51 | ZHANG Jiening G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 35% | 3% |
| 52 | TEH Ryan | 100% | 96% | 58% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 53 | AMAYA Jared C. | 100% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 54 | TAPUS Alexandru | 100% | 92% | 62% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 55 | NG Kenneth | 100% | 83% | 31% | 5% | - | - | |
| 55 | CHIN Ryan | 100% | 72% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 57 | PARKER Kainoa | 100% | 77% | 33% | 6% | - | - | |
| 58 | ZUO Ethan | 100% | 72% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 59 | WACHTEL Oliver | 100% | 45% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 60 | GREEN Kieran | 100% | 88% | 50% | 12% | 1% | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.