San Francisco, CA - San Francisco, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | BANERJEE Anup | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 71% |
| 2 | COELHO Cristiano P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 86% |
| 3 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 40% |
| 3 | LO Conrad | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% |
| 5 | NG Eben S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 39% |
| 6 | MA Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 19% |
| 7 | ZHANG Jiening G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% |
| 8 | CHIRASHNYA Daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 49% |
| 9 | WOO Christian | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 42% | 9% |
| 10 | MASCARI DUMONT Louis | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 32% |
| 11 | WU Lucas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% | 8% |
| 12 | HOSKERI Anik S. | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 13 | WANG Ethan | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 15% | 1% |
| 14 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 18% |
| 15 | BAO Aaron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 28% |
| 16 | CHIN Ryan | 100% | 92% | 63% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 17 | SOTO-ULEV Aden A. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 56% | 16% |
| 18 | KANG Anthony Jaegu | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 53% | 11% |
| 19 | TUAN Evan | 100% | 96% | 70% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 20 | ZUO Ethan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 24% | - |
| 21 | FINNEY Lorenz | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 16% |
| 22 | LYNCH Owen C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 32% |
| 23 | WYMAN Julian | 100% | 99% | 93% | 66% | 25% | 3% |
| 24 | ZENG Chuyi | 100% | 71% | 26% | 4% | - | - |
| 25 | CHENG Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 11% |
| 26 | MA Bryant | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 27 | TAPUS Andrei | 100% | 93% | 60% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 28 | SEO Shawn | 100% | 98% | 82% | 42% | 6% | - |
| 29 | CORTRIGHT Skipper (Matthew) | 100% | 96% | 72% | 29% | 5% | - |
| 30 | RANJITH Yash M. | 100% | 99% | 82% | 45% | 13% | 2% |
| 31 | VALOUEV Aleksey | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 17% | 2% |
| 32 | CHEN Justin K. | 100% | 91% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 33 | TEH Ryan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 22% | - |
| 34 | LI Jett | 100% | 95% | 71% | 31% | 6% | - |
| 35 | SHEN Owen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 65% | 22% |
| 36 | TONKOVICH Ryan | 100% | 100% | 92% | 65% | 26% | 4% |
| 37 | KIM Ryan Y. | 100% | 91% | 52% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 38 | MAK Osman K. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 35% | 4% | - |
| 39 | MYERS Dean | 100% | 86% | 46% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 40 | CAZALET George | 100% | 86% | 51% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 41 | RUBIN Max | 100% | 88% | 51% | 14% | 1% | - |
| 42 | LO Preston | 100% | 95% | 69% | 31% | 6% | - |
| 43 | MIN Lucas | 100% | 69% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 45 | GREGORY Henry F. | 100% | 87% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 46 | MCCORMACK WILCOX Braeden | 100% | 99% | 78% | 35% | 5% | - |
| 48 | RAMOS Owen | 100% | 94% | 68% | 27% | 5% | - |
| 49 | ZHANG Luke | 100% | 72% | 26% | 3% | - | - |
| 50 | LAURIMAA Emil | 100% | 88% | 46% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 51 | FRANC Geoffrey C. | 100% | 52% | 13% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | LING Eddie | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 14% | 2% |
| 53 | AGRAWAL Niki | 100% | 63% | 19% | 2% | - | - |
| 54 | RASMUSSEN Sage | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 23% | 3% |
| 55 | CHU Colin | 100% | 65% | 15% | 1% | - | - |
| 56 | UHLIG Cole | 100% | 94% | 71% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
| 56 | ZWICKER Jacob | 100% | 33% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 56 | CHAN Connor | 100% | 90% | 44% | 7% | - | - |
| 59 | CHEN Tyler | 100% | 95% | 70% | 29% | 5% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.