Canlan Sports Lake Barrington - Barrington, IL, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | JOVANOVIC Jovan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% |
| 2 | SPIER Julian H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 74% |
| 3 | MITEV Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 40% | |
| 3 | BOSS Evan | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 11% | 1% | |
| 5 | CURTY Jack | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 22% | 2% |
| 6 | BORISENKO Samuel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 13% | |
| 7 | TOLLEFSON Zachary | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 31% | 4% |
| 8 | GRAVES Lawson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 36% | 4% |
| 9 | HUANG Kenneth | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
| 10 | LEHNER Brian | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 18% | 3% |
| 11 | SWENSON Keane J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 63% | 11% |
| 12 | ROWLAND Marsden | 100% | 98% | 80% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
| 13 | SIEDOW William | 100% | 99% | 86% | 44% | 6% | ||
| 14 | BISSEN Quinn | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 21% | 3% | |
| 15 | IVAKIMOV Vasil | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% |
| 16 | BUTTA Reese | 100% | 97% | 79% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 17 | BENACK Steven M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 66% | ||
| 18 | MCDOWELL Will | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 20% | |
| 19 | JOHNSON Jay | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 27% | 3% |
| 20 | DADE MAXIMUS | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 33% | 6% | - |
| 21 | SWENSON Diego | 100% | 53% | 14% | 2% | < 1% | - | |
| 22 | BEACH John | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 7% |
| 23 | BLAT Robert | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 19% | 3% |
| 24 | NALLICHERI Ayaan | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 1% | |
| 25 | FELICIANO Damien | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 21% | 3% |
| 26 | KRAJ Pawel | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 49% | 13% | 1% |
| 27 | KIM Remington | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 28 | SNYDER Alex | 100% | 99% | 82% | 37% | 4% | ||
| 29 | SINAI Nathan G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% | |
| 30 | THOMSON Champa | 100% | 95% | 73% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 31 | GLEN Ethan | 100% | 87% | 40% | 7% | - | ||
| 32 | HONG Daniel | 100% | 93% | 64% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 33 | KENT Dwain | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 48% | 14% |
| 34 | SAYLOR Henry | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 35 | VIDOR Caio | 100% | 78% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 36 | SHI Yeyu | 100% | 81% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 37 | WANG Kaiyan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 34% | 6% | - |
| 38 | CONKLIN Jim | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 28% |
| 39 | WILLIAMS Logan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 5% | |
| 40 | HERRERA Xavier | 100% | 89% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 41 | BETTS Jr Anthony P. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% | |
| 42 | LARSON Vaughn | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 43 | NASSOS Eric | 100% | 91% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 44 | CAMPBELL Finn | 100% | 66% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 45 | SLEZAK Christian | 100% | 67% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 46 | JERDEE Colton | 100% | 80% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 47 | HUGHES Michael D. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 20% | 3% | |
| 48 | MACGREGOR Grant | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 6% | - | |
| 49 | SWANSON Dave | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 7% |
| 50 | DRAWZ Chase | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 51 | SAYLOR Nathaniel | 100% | 71% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 52 | YANG Junhu | 100% | 43% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 53 | AU Joshua | 100% | 41% | 6% | - | - | ||
| 54 | TIERNEY Luke | 100% | 71% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 54 | ALLEN David | 100% | 93% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - | |
| 56 | MILLER Lance W. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 3% | |
| 57 | ALI Adam | 100% | 99% | 85% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 58 | ROBBINS Christopher (Chris) W. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.