Fredericksburg Convention Center - Fredericksburg, VA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | DOUBOV Andrew | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
| 2 | KIM Gene | V V V V D V | V V V V V D | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
| 3 | KOGAN Yelisey L. | D V V V D V | V V V V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 3 | TOWNSHEND Connor | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
| 5 | LEE Aiden | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
| 6 | ARZT Nicholas | V D V V V V | V V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 7 | LIU Yueri | V V V V V D | V V V D | 5.6 | 5 | -0.6 |
| 8 | ZHU Yiming | D V V V V D | V V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 9 | AYOTTE James | V V V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 10 | CUMMINGS Owen | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 11 | YI Nathan | V D V V V V | V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 12 | CHANEY Charles | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 13 | KROPP Wesley | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 14 | DILDA Griffin | V V V V D V | V V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
| 15 | RAMEY Daylon | V V V D V V | V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 16 | GUO Benjamin | V V D D V D | V V V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 17 | ZHANG Kwan Fei(Albert) | V V V V V V | V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
| 18 | ADDYSON Aidan | V V V V V | V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
| 19 | KIM Joshua | V V D V V V | V D | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 20 | WANG Eason | V D V V V V | V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
| 21 | YU Jason | D V V V V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 22 | BORAN Brooks | V V D V D V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 22 | KONG Ethan | V V V D D V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
| 24 | CHAN Kyle Si Tin | V V D V V D | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 25 | CUELLAR Markus | V D V V V D | V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 26 | CHAN Ian | D D V V V | V D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 27 | LEECH Braedan | V D V V D D | V V D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
| 28 | NG Nico | D D V D V V | V V D | 4.6 | 3 | -1.6 |
| 29 | ROBERTS Phoenix | D D V V V D | V V D | 4.4 | 3 | -1.4 |
| 30 | SAAD Peter | D D V V V D | V V D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 31 | WANG Marcus | V D D V V D | V V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 32 | YAO Ryan | D V V V D D | V V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 33 | ARMSTRONG TyLee | D V V V V V | D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 33 | MARISI Gabriel | V V V D V V | D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 35 | PARKER Isaiah | V D D V V V | D | 5.3 | 4 | -1.3 |
| 36 | HERDMAN Julian | V D V V V D | D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 37 | LEE Benjamin | D V V V D V | D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 37 | LOPATIN Sergei | D D V V V V | D | 1.6 | 4 | +2.4 |
| 39 | BENNETT Pierce | D V V D V V | D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
| 40 | TSEN Mason | V V D V V D | D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 41 | OSHIMA Robert | V D D V V V | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 42 | BENUCCI Vincent | D V D V V V | D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 43 | KONG Brandon | D V V V D | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 44 | SUNKARA Vishnu | V V D V D D | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 45 | KELLY Blair | V V D D D V | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 45 | LEE Henry | V D D D V V | D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 47 | HALE Bradley | V V D D D V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 48 | SCORDINSKY Liam | D V V D D V | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 49 | KIM Daniel | D V D V V D | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 50 | ALPSOY Emir | V D V D V D | V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 51 | KHAW-BRIOT Julien | V D V D V D | V D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 52 | JANKOVIC Ivan | D V V D D V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 53 | PERI Mourya | D D D V V | V D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 54 | YU Jeremy | D V D V D D | V D | 2.9 | 2 | -0.9 |
| 55 | GATEWOOD Michael | V V D D D D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 56 | WILKERSON Tobias | V V D D D D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 57 | URIA Sullivan | D D D V V D | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 58 | HUDSON Declan | D D D D V V | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 59 | NILSEN Mark | V D D D D | V D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 60 | BAYUS Oliver | V D D D D | V D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 61 | CHONG Eden | D D D D D V | V D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 62 | STRAFFORD Andrew | V D D D D D | V D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 63 | OZBAY Alp | D D D V D D | V D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 64 | MCCABE Kian | D D D V D D | V D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 65 | KUBBA Sauvil | D D V D V V | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 66 | SAAD Noah | D V D V D V | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 67 | SALLAI Abel | V D V D D | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 68 | FEELY Benjamin | V V D D D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 69 | WEI Jayden | D D V D D V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 70 | PARY Jean Pierre | D D V V D D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 71 | PETROVSKI Kiril | D V D D D V | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 72 | DAVIS Kai | D V D D V D | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 73 | YAO Aiden | D D V V D D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 74 | GALIOTE James | D V D D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 75 | MASSIE Jay | D D D D V | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 76 | BROSNAN Solomon | D D D D D V | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 77 | QI Bryan | V D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 78 | PRABHU Srinish | D D V D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 79 | SACKETT Gavin | V D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 80 | BANG Dylan | D V D D D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 81 | STUKALO Egor | D D D D D V | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 82 | SCOTTODIMARCO James | V D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 83 | MILLER Xavier | D D D D D V | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 84 | MILLER Balthazar | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 85 | FENG Xinmin | D D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 0 | -1.8 |
| 86 | REYNOLDS CHANG Luke | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 87 | CHOI Joshua | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 88 | BATISTA Julian | D D D D D D | D | 2.2 | 0 | -2.2 |
| 89 | CHIU Preston | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.