Chatsworth, CA - Chatsworth, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LO Conrad | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 35% | 58% |
| 2 | CANLAS Nathan | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 34% | |
| 3 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 15% | |
| 3 | WYMAN Julian | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 7% | |
| 5 | SADOVSKY Leor B. | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 23% | |
| 6 | SIU Aiden | - | 7% | 29% | 40% | 21% | 4% | |
| 7 | LLIDO Soren | 1% | 10% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 3% | |
| 8 | ZHANG Jiening G. | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 12% | |
| 9 | NAYGAS LAWRENCE I. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 44% | |
| 10 | KANG Anthony Jaegu | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 38% | |
| 11 | SOTO-ULEV Aden A. | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 30% | |
| 12 | KIM Ryan Y. | - | 7% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 5% | |
| 13 | PARK Gabriel | 20% | 43% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 14 | VALOUEV Aleksey | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
| 15 | CHOI Ethan | - | - | 1% | 12% | 36% | 42% | 10% |
| 16 | WANG Logan | - | 2% | 17% | 38% | 32% | 10% | 1% |
| 17 | DERRICK Blake | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | |
| 18 | FUKUDA Diego | 1% | 8% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 4% | |
| 19 | WANG Ethan | - | 2% | 17% | 39% | 32% | 9% | 1% |
| 20 | OH Jaden | - | 7% | 33% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 21 | WONG Antonio | 1% | 7% | 25% | 36% | 25% | 6% | |
| 22 | LEE Dylan | 6% | 33% | 41% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 23 | RYOU Andy | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 17% | |
| 24 | DINSAY Kristjan | 1% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 2% | |
| 25 | BAUER Roman | 3% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
| 26 | WU Lucas | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 12% | 2% | |
| 27 | LIEW Harrison C. | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | |
| 28 | KHVANG Sebastien T. | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
| 29 | CO Dylan | 1% | 9% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 3% | |
| 30 | DE LA FUENTE Ian | 7% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
| 31 | LO Preston | 7% | 27% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
| 32 | KIM Luke | 33% | 42% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | WU Alber Y. | 1% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 2% | |
| 34 | KIM Aiden | 17% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 35 | LAI Myron | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% | |
| 36 | ALVES Austin | 1% | 12% | 35% | 36% | 14% | 2% | |
| 37 | NGUYEN martin | 8% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 38 | GORDON William L. | 41% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 39 | MANIKTALA Suvir | 18% | 52% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 40 | YUE Jackson | 20% | 44% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 41 | SONG Beckett | 40% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 42 | CHANG Connor | 63% | 31% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 43 | MONTGOMERY Georgie | 58% | 36% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.