Chatsworth, CA - Chatsworth, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LO Conrad | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 58% |
| 2 | CANLAS Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 34% | |
| 3 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 15% | |
| 3 | WYMAN Julian | 100% | 100% | 94% | 74% | 37% | 7% | |
| 5 | SADOVSKY Leor B. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 23% | |
| 6 | SIU Aiden | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 24% | 4% | |
| 7 | LLIDO Soren | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 21% | 3% | |
| 8 | ZHANG Jiening G. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 12% | |
| 9 | NAYGAS LAWRENCE I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 44% | |
| 10 | KANG Anthony Jaegu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% | |
| 11 | SOTO-ULEV Aden A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 30% | |
| 12 | KIM Ryan Y. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 68% | 29% | 5% | |
| 13 | PARK Gabriel | 100% | 80% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 14 | VALOUEV Aleksey | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 8% | 1% | |
| 15 | CHOI Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 51% | 10% |
| 16 | WANG Logan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 43% | 11% | 1% |
| 17 | DERRICK Blake | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 5% | |
| 18 | FUKUDA Diego | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 26% | 4% | |
| 19 | WANG Ethan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 41% | 9% | 1% |
| 20 | OH Jaden | 100% | 100% | 92% | 60% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 21 | WONG Antonio | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 31% | 6% | |
| 22 | LEE Dylan | 100% | 94% | 61% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 23 | RYOU Andy | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 56% | 17% | |
| 24 | DINSAY Kristjan | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 19% | 2% | |
| 25 | BAUER Roman | 100% | 97% | 74% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
| 26 | WU Lucas | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% | |
| 27 | LIEW Harrison C. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 6% | |
| 28 | KHVANG Sebastien T. | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
| 29 | CO Dylan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 20% | 3% | |
| 30 | DE LA FUENTE Ian | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% | |
| 31 | LO Preston | 100% | 93% | 67% | 30% | 8% | 1% | |
| 32 | KIM Luke | 100% | 67% | 25% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | WU Alber Y. | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 18% | 2% | |
| 34 | KIM Aiden | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 35 | LAI Myron | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 12% | 1% | |
| 36 | ALVES Austin | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 16% | 2% | |
| 37 | NGUYEN martin | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 5% | - | |
| 38 | GORDON William L. | 100% | 59% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 39 | MANIKTALA Suvir | 100% | 82% | 30% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 40 | YUE Jackson | 100% | 80% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 41 | SONG Beckett | 100% | 60% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 42 | CHANG Connor | 100% | 37% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 43 | MONTGOMERY Georgie | 100% | 42% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.