Team Touche Fencing Center - San Diego, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | MCDANIELS Jeremy | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
| 2 | SODERBERG Alex Z. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.8 | 6 | +0.2 |
| 3 | SMITH Justin C. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
| 3 | WANG Lucas | D V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.3 | 6 | +1.7 |
| 5 | FU Nolan | V V V V V V D | V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
| 6 | DILLON Anik | V V D V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 7 | GADHVI Darius | D V V V V V | V V D | 3.4 | 5 | +1.6 |
| 8 | WALSH Landon | V D V D D V V | V V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 9 | ROBITZSKI Daniel A. | V V D V V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 10 | FIECHTNER Thomas A. | V V V D V | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 11 | LOCASALE Nicholas A. | V V V D V V | V D | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
| 12 | LIANG Donny | V V V D V V | V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 13 | NIXON Mark | V V V V V D D | V V D | 6.6 | 5 | -1.6 |
| 14 | PARRA Lucas | V V D D V V V | V V D | 2.6 | 5 | +2.4 |
| 15 | LUNDE Drew | V D D D D V | V V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 16 | CHAN Allison M. | D D D V D D | V V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 17 | NORTON Henry | V V V V V V D | D | 4.2 | 6 | +1.8 |
| 18 | DUDLEY John-Rick | V V V V V D | D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
| 19 | NGUYEN Ethan V. | V D V V V V | D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 20 | SKILLENS Davin | V D V V D V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 21 | ALLEN David | D V V V D | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 22 | GONZALEZ-KUSHNER Elian | V V D V V D D | V D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
| 23 | MAGOS David | D V V V D D V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 24 | WANG Dylan | D V V D V D | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
| 25 | HERD Angela | D V D V D V | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 26 | SWANSON Miles | V D D V D V | V D | 1.1 | 3 | +1.9 |
| 27 | NUGENT Curtis | D V V D V D | V D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 28 | HARRIS Roark S. | V V D D V D | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 29 | CHAO Warren | D D D V V D | V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 30 | XUE Chenming | V D V D D D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 30 | LAU Caleb | D D V V D D | V D | 0.8 | 2 | +1.2 |
| 32 | HILLSTROM Nathan | D D V D V D D | V D | 4.8 | 2 | -2.8 |
| 33 | KNIGHT Alex | D D D V V | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 34 | SETTE Alessandro | D V V D D V | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 35 | GONZÁLEZ Jesús | D D D V V D V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 36 | GAYLORD Ronan | D D D V D V V | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 37 | BARTON Isabelle | D V D D D V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 38 | PARSONS Charlie | D D V D D | D | 0.2 | 1 | +0.8 |
| 39 | LIANG Dong | D D V D D V D | D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 40 | PICKETT Alexander | D V D D D V D | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 41 | ROBSON Sam | V D D D D D V | D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
| 42 | VISKANTA Martynas | V D D D D D V | D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
| 43 | VORIS Luke | D D D V D D | D | 3.4 | 1 | -2.4 |
| 44 | HORN Evans | D D V D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 45 | SANTOS Benjamin | D D D D D V | D | 0.4 | 1 | +0.6 |
| 46 | RIDLEY Alan P. | D V D D D D | D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 48 | BATTLE Jabril | D D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
| 49 | CHHOKAR Inder | D D D D D D | D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
| 50 | EGENOLF Gabriella | D D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 51 | KENO Daniel | D D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.