Rockland Community College, Eugene Levy Field House - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WANG Mendy | - | - | - | 1% | 14% | 86% | |
| 2 | ZHONG Kingsley | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 36% | |
| 3 | CAO Aaron | - | - | 3% | 19% | 44% | 34% | |
| 3 | ZHUANG Eddie | - | - | - | - | 4% | 30% | 65% |
| 5 | XIAN kevin | - | - | - | 2% | 21% | 77% | |
| 6 | LI Andrew | - | - | 9% | 36% | 44% | 11% | |
| 7 | QIAN Will | - | - | 1% | 14% | 54% | 31% | |
| 8 | LIN George | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
| 9 | FAN Ze Lin | - | - | - | 6% | 34% | 60% | |
| 10 | HU Michael | - | - | - | 7% | 43% | 50% | |
| 11 | SONG Enoch | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 46% |
| 12 | WU Wallace | - | - | - | - | 4% | 27% | 68% |
| 13 | CHONG Cooper | - | 3% | 19% | 42% | 33% | 3% | |
| 14 | KIAYIAS Anthony | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 8% |
| 15 | PAN Howard Haoran | - | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 42% | 32% |
| 16 | YOON Mason | - | 2% | 14% | 39% | 41% | 4% | |
| 17 | ZHAI Alex | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 57% |
| 18 | XIA Vincent | - | - | 4% | 16% | 35% | 35% | 10% |
| 19 | WU Max | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 1% |
| 20 | SHEN Lucas | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
| 21 | WU Yulen | - | 1% | 9% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 3% |
| 22 | LIN Lucas | - | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 41% | 32% |
| 23 | MOON Nolan | - | - | 2% | 13% | 35% | 41% | 9% |
| 24 | HUANG Dalynn | - | - | 1% | 13% | 44% | 42% | |
| 25 | ZHANG Eric | - | - | 4% | 24% | 49% | 23% | |
| 26 | GUGALA Frank | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 41% | 15% | |
| 27 | SHOU Raymond | - | - | - | 2% | 21% | 77% | |
| 28 | YANG Luca | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 8% |
| 29 | SHARMA Ari | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 5% |
| 30 | VENAFRO Tristan | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 42% | 37% |
| 31 | SU Sean | - | 1% | 10% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 3% |
| 32 | LEE Ryan | 8% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 33 | CHANG Parker | - | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 64% |
| 34 | HUYNH Kaleb | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 44% | 18% | |
| 35 | KANAN Noland | 1% | 9% | 32% | 40% | 17% | 1% | |
| 36 | LECH Landon | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 37 | HEBERT SEBASTIEN | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 2% |
| 38 | JAZWINSKI Archer | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 39 | FOMIN Dash | 3% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 9% | - | |
| 40 | FANG Ryan | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 41 | XU ETHAN | - | 4% | 31% | 45% | 19% | 2% | |
| 42 | STARK Ethan | 1% | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 43 | YU Oliver | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
| 44 | WANG Jaaziel | 2% | 16% | 43% | 33% | 6% | - | |
| 45 | XIA Wenhao | - | 6% | 27% | 41% | 22% | 4% | |
| 46 | CHEUNG Zachary | 1% | 10% | 35% | 39% | 15% | 1% | |
| 47 | KIM JOSHUA | 18% | 42% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 48 | LIU KUNDE | 2% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 49 | COHEN Benjamin | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
| 50 | DUAN EDWIN | 2% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 51 | HE Ryan | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
| 52 | GUTKOVSKIY Ryan | 3% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 53 | FANG Lionel | - | 6% | 36% | 43% | 15% | 1% | |
| 54 | DAVE Neil | 1% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 56 | LIN Alexander | 1% | 12% | 37% | 37% | 12% | 1% | |
| 57 | WANG Leon | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 58 | MAN Dylan | 8% | 27% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 59 | JIANG Ethan | 1% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 60 | PELLERIN Liam | 21% | 40% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 61 | KIM ISAAC | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 62 | TARDIFF Owen | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 63 | MOSAMEH Faraj | 12% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 64 | CUI Jason | 4% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 65 | LIN Tyler | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 66 | TYRIKOS FRAZIS Dimitri | 10% | 37% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 67 | OBAS Logan X. | 19% | 46% | 29% | 6% | - | - | |
| 68 | YU Adam | 4% | 24% | 42% | 24% | 5% | - | |
| 69 | MOORE Quinn | 1% | 10% | 35% | 40% | 13% | 1% | |
| 70 | XIE zhouhan | 2% | 15% | 40% | 36% | 7% | - | |
| 71 | DING Jacob | 5% | 31% | 42% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 72 | SAVIR Ethan | 4% | 28% | 42% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 73 | RAY William | 19% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 74 | BANGALE Viraaj | 29% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 75 | KO Owen | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 76 | LI Ethan | 15% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 78 | DEL VALLE-LIN Julian | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 79 | TISHCHENKO Vasily | - | 4% | 22% | 43% | 29% | 1% | |
| 80 | POLEBOYINA Aarav | 59% | 35% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 81 | HUA Isaac | 1% | 8% | 34% | 39% | 16% | 2% | |
| 82 | CAI Mark | 4% | 23% | 44% | 26% | 3% | - | |
| 83 | CAI Charlie | 25% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 84 | SHA Adam | 16% | 51% | 27% | 6% | - | - | |
| 85 | ZEI Julian | 61% | 33% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 86 | HWANG Samuel | 62% | 32% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 87 | CHEN Jonathan | 36% | 44% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
| 88 | BRYSON Aidan | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 89 | LIU Max | 23% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 90 | STABROWSKI Joaquin | 9% | 28% | 34% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 90 | JUTAGIR Eugene | 61% | 34% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 92 | HO Marcus | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 93 | MENZEL Lucas | 1% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 94 | KALACHNIKOFF Henry | 1% | 9% | 31% | 42% | 15% | 2% | |
| 95 | SUN Neil | 8% | 41% | 37% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 96 | ZUO Yizhi | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 97 | ZHANG Andrew | 8% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 98 | NG Harry | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 99 | AWALGAONKAR Aahan | 6% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 100 | CHIN Iker | 30% | 45% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
| 101 | LEE Andrew | 45% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 102 | MILLER Julian | 1% | 8% | 22% | 33% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 102 | YAMADA Kai | 22% | 61% | 16% | 1% | - | - | |
| 104 | YAMADA Ray | 26% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 105 | CAI daniel | 59% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 106 | HARDING James | 62% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.