Columbus, OH - Columbus, OH, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | VERGARA Nicolas M. | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 41% | 37% |
| 2 | GOLOBISH Kyle | - | - | - | 5% | 21% | 44% | 31% |
| 3 | PAINE Jared A. | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 59% |
| 3 | O'HARA Keegan J. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
| 5 | VAYSBUKH Konstantin | - | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
| 6 | LI Jeffrey | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% |
| 7 | ABDELGAWAD Abdelrahman | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
| 8 | LI Brian X | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 33% | 31% | 12% |
| 9 | WEISE Eli S. | - | 1% | 4% | 15% | 31% | 34% | 15% |
| 10 | MARRAN Erik R. | - | - | 4% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 12% |
| 11 | TARBUSKOVICH III John | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 36% | 15% | |
| 12 | HERGERT Benito | - | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 40% | 25% |
| 13 | DOLMETSCH Max | - | - | 3% | 13% | 30% | 36% | 17% |
| 14 | WISNIEWSKI Bart | 1% | 8% | 23% | 32% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
| 15 | ANDERSON Elias W. | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 16 | KIM PAUL | - | 1% | 4% | 16% | 32% | 33% | 14% |
| 17 | WORLEY Aren R. | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | |
| 18 | WU Byron | - | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
| 19 | WHITEHURST JJ | - | 4% | 16% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 3% |
| 20 | MANZ Hamilton R. | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
| 21 | CHOI Isaac | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 22 | LEHR William D. | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 30% | 9% | |
| 23 | AHN Gus | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% | |
| 24 | SCHULTZ Rowan | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 25% | 6% | |
| 25 | SMITH Zane A. | 4% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | |
| 26 | MIRANDA Matteo | 1% | 5% | 19% | 32% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 27 | LABROZZI Aidan | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 28 | TEVEBAUGH Mason C. | 1% | 9% | 23% | 32% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
| 29 | MCLOUDREY Callan E. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 26% | |
| 30 | KOUSTIKOV Max | - | 1% | 7% | 20% | 34% | 29% | 10% |
| 31 | DAVIES Christian B. | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 32 | CHUNG Thomas | 1% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 2% | |
| 33 | CHITU Julian S. | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
| 34 | LAWLER Aidan | - | - | 4% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
| 34 | AU Marcus J. | - | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 34 | PAK Charles | - | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 37% | 13% |
| 38 | ZONE Liam | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 4% |
| 39 | HOLDERNESS Landon | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 39% | 19% |
| 39 | TUCKER Owen J. | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 41 | CHAWLA Armaan | - | 2% | 11% | 26% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
| 41 | WAGMAN Robert S. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 30% |
| 43 | BUYANOV Nikita V. | - | 2% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% |
| 44 | COLLYMORE Spencer T. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 27% |
| 45 | HODGE Jaydon L. | 1% | 6% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
| 46 | THOMAS Jr. Robert D. | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% |
| 46 | MIDDEKE Devin | - | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 40% | 26% |
| 48 | RICKMAN Ian | - | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 7% |
| 49 | GRAY Alex | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 5% |
| 50 | MUNROE Shane | - | 5% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 51 | DIDYCZ Nicholas | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 1% |
| 52 | GAINES Aaron | 3% | 14% | 29% | 31% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 53 | MARTIN Dirk | 2% | 14% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 54 | HOWELL Thomas A. | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 11% |
| 55 | TROAKE Henry R. | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 6% | |
| 56 | SCHENCK Theo | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
| 57 | LEE PETER H. | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 58 | SVIBEN Cameron | - | 5% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 59 | THORESON Gary C. | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 60 | RASMUSSEN Jack | 17% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 61 | HEALY Griffen | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 62 | CONVERSE Warren D. | 4% | 17% | 32% | 29% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 63 | REDHEAD Nolan P. | 26% | 43% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 64 | VANDERLINDEN Brian | 2% | 10% | 25% | 32% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 65 | SHAH S Ayush | - | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
| 66 | HORTELANO Ethan | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 9% |
| 67 | LATIF IMRAN ZAKARIYYA | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 39% | |
| 68 | DESOUZA Hansel S. | - | - | 2% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% |
| 69 | ALFAIATE Lucas | - | 4% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 3% |
| 70 | TORDO Garrett | - | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 22% |
| 71 | JONES Elijah | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 11% |
| 72 | GASIOROWSKI Devin G. | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 73 | CHREKY Jacob D. | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 7% |
| 74 | WEAVER Neil | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 75 | LI Jeffrey | - | 3% | 21% | 41% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 76 | WERCHAN Andrew R. | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 77 | KAUFMANN Connor G. | - | 5% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 10% | |
| 78 | SINGH Laekhram | 5% | 25% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
| 79 | KOKENGE Chad | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
| 80 | TUMIBAY Noah C. | 1% | 7% | 22% | 32% | 26% | 10% | 2% |
| 81 | KING Cameron | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 82 | COX Gavin V. | 1% | 7% | 21% | 32% | 26% | 11% | 2% |
| 83 | NG Joshua Z. | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 36% | 29% | 8% |
| 84 | ARANA Abraham | - | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 5% |
| 85 | DINKINS Shuayb | 8% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 86 | LU Sebastian X. | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 87 | EASTMAN Blake C. | 16% | 36% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - | |
| 88 | DYER Carson C. | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - | |
| 88 | JAAFAR Omar | 9% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 90 | SILVANIA Michael | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 91 | CLARK Carson | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | |
| 92 | GRIMSLEY Devin M. | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 20% | |
| 93 | COOPER Rowan | - | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% |
| 94 | WOMACH Tristan | 2% | 10% | 25% | 32% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 95 | JOSEPH William | - | 6% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 96 | SOLTER Kai | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 97 | GODDARD Hal D. | 1% | 8% | 23% | 32% | 25% | 10% | 1% |
| 97 | CHEN Austin | 3% | 18% | 34% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 99 | SAN JUAN Carlos | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
| 99 | COLLINS Damase | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 101 | PHILLIPS Wesley Y. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 40% | 18% |
| 102 | GLECKNER Aidan | - | 5% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 103 | LEVY Jeffrey M. | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 12% |
| 104 | MEYERS Peter | - | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 11% |
| 105 | PRABHAKAR vibhav | 4% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 106 | NGUYEN Steven | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 34% | 31% | 11% |
| 107 | KENNEDY Kyle J. | 6% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 107 | YULE Alexander L. | 1% | 6% | 19% | 32% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
| 109 | O'BRIEN Timothy S. | 8% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 110 | SIMMONS Tristan A. | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 111 | MUN Chur-Yong | 26% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 112 | JOHNSON Evan | 1% | 6% | 18% | 31% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
| 113 | REED Dusty (Allen) | 5% | 19% | 31% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 114 | GUI Runlin | - | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 10% |
| 115 | ZHOU Jiasheng | - | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% |
| 116 | GILLISON Edward L. | 3% | 16% | 32% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 117 | HAMPTON Kistler | 1% | 8% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
| 118 | GULLO Kenji Y. | 10% | 29% | 33% | 20% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 119 | BOGUSLAVSKY Daniel | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% | |
| 120 | CHOUDHRY Hannaan S. | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 43% | 25% | |
| 121 | CHITU Andreas C. | 3% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 13% | 2% | |
| 122 | SIDDIQUI HUMZA K. | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% |
| 123 | PARTE Aidan | 9% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 124 | ZHAO Luhan | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 125 | THORNTON Zachary | 1% | 9% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
| 127 | BOWDEN JR. William | 7% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 128 | CHEN Eric | 2% | 13% | 29% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 129 | WADE Grayson | 2% | 13% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 5% | - |
| 129 | MOYA Mason | - | 3% | 14% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 4% |
| 131 | MAGDA Daniel | 2% | 12% | 29% | 33% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 132 | HOSELTON Spencer | 5% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 133 | MARIN Lucas | 9% | 28% | 34% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 134 | MARICI Ryan | 3% | 15% | 29% | 30% | 17% | 5% | 1% |
| 135 | WALSH Kevin | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 136 | LIU Felix | 3% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 15% | 4% | - |
| 137 | DYER Ian E. | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | |
| 138 | LOUIE Jason | 9% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 139 | PEDERSEN Christopher C. | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 27% | 7% | |
| 140 | VON KLAR Ryker | 23% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 141 | AMMON Blue | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | |
| 142 | DOUGLAS Colin F. | 1% | 9% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | |
| 143 | GU Brian | 10% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 144 | PENG Gregory | 30% | 41% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 145 | DILLE Brice | - | 4% | 16% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 3% |
| 146 | HART Jackson | - | 3% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 7% | - |
| 147 | THOMAS Samuel | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 9% |
| 148 | YIM Alex | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 3% |
| 149 | BROWN Nathan P. | 23% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
| 150 | STEWART Charlie | 10% | 32% | 35% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 151 | HU Alexander W. | 4% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 152 | HAW Keith F. | 4% | 22% | 40% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 153 | KAGAN Spencer E. | 1% | 5% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 154 | GRAVIS Martin V. | 48% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 155 | TRUJILLO Andres | 14% | 43% | 31% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 156 | LANGENDERFER Braeden | 2% | 12% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
| 157 | RICKERT Michael A. | 12% | 38% | 34% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 157 | HOLCOMB Wesley | 43% | 40% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 159 | FINFROCK Cameron J. | 2% | 13% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 3% | |
| 160 | WANG Eric S | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 3% | |
| 161 | HESS Marc F. | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | |
| 162 | LAING Christopher | 45% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 163 | PAINE Evan J. | - | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 164 | SCHAEFER Joshua M. | 2% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 165 | MCDARBY Kieron M. | 9% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 166 | LIPTON Michael D. | 4% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 166 | BOLERJACK Berton J. | 25% | 43% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 169 | SNYDER John W. | 6% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 170 | FITZGIBBON Sean P. | 6% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 171 | SCHWEIKERT Eric | 8% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 172 | MUFIC Oliver | 24% | 40% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 173 | HOUST Michael D. | 29% | 49% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 174 | WEBER Dick | 30% | 42% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 174 | HAN David | 22% | 38% | 28% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 176 | REITINGER Luke M. | 25% | 41% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 177 | BERKE Daniel (Dan) L. | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 178 | CHOUDHRY Hassan S. | 10% | 34% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 179 | LEVCHOOK Thomas | 8% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 180 | WILLIAMS Richard | 38% | 41% | 17% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 181 | BARTCH Ethan L. | 9% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 182 | SQUIER Woody | 33% | 45% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 182 | TAROLLI Alexander | 10% | 30% | 34% | 19% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 184 | FISKE Jonah | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% |
| 185 | MITCHELL Matthew D. | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 186 | RODNEY Maxwell | 4% | 19% | 33% | 28% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 187 | HARBER Mike | 2% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 10% | 1% | |
| 188 | MIEZIANKO Sebastian A. | 1% | 12% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 189 | DYER CJ | 1% | 12% | 34% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 190 | RHEA Eric L. | 28% | 41% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 191 | STONE Ken | 47% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 191 | SHOWALTER Joshua | 11% | 55% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 193 | CROWLEY Jr Daniel F. | 21% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 194 | DICKSON Tim | 9% | 29% | 36% | 21% | 6% | 1% | |
| 195 | PHAM Ian Q. | 1% | 9% | 27% | 34% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 197 | KARAMANIAN Nicholas | 22% | 40% | 27% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.