Pasadena, CA - Pasadena, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LIN Kyran | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 52% | |
| 2 | CHUNG Thomas | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
| 3 | MOSES Alexander | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 42% | 39% |
| 3 | HUNT Aidan | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 42% | 19% | |
| 5 | MENDOZA Zachari | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 45% | |
| 6 | JAIN Aditya | - | - | 5% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 6% |
| 7 | ZHU Max | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 27% |
| 8 | BRUSKOTTER Reiland | 1% | 8% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 4% | |
| 9 | THOMPSON Chester | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 5% |
| 10 | KIM Darius H. | - | 5% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 7% | |
| 11 | JIN daniel | - | - | 1% | 14% | 46% | 39% | |
| 12 | GILLISON Edward L. | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 13 | WANG DEVON | - | 2% | 14% | 41% | 35% | 8% | |
| 14 | DEKERMANJI Christopher | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 43% | 24% | |
| 15 | KOPPE Alexander | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 4% | |
| 16 | GUPTA-GARCIA Raj | 18% | 45% | 31% | 6% | - | - | |
| 17 | DRIBIN Ezra | - | 1% | 8% | 37% | 43% | 11% | |
| 18 | NOEL Sebastien A. | - | - | 3% | 24% | 49% | 25% | |
| 19 | ALFARO Justus | - | 4% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 6% | |
| 20 | LAGARNIA Luke | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% | |
| 21 | DALVA Michael | - | 4% | 22% | 45% | 25% | 4% | |
| 22 | EVANS noah | 4% | 21% | 39% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
| 23 | MCDONALD Ethan | 4% | 20% | 37% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
| 24 | FERRIERE Joshua | 2% | 12% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 5% | - |
| 25 | DAO Alexander | 7% | 33% | 40% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 26 | BAZHENOV Anthony | 4% | 25% | 41% | 24% | 6% | - | |
| 27 | SCHROEDER Dylan | 3% | 15% | 31% | 31% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 28 | CROSSMAN Brandon | 24% | 44% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
| 29 | SAMY David | 7% | 33% | 42% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 30 | BARRESI Isaac | 38% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 31 | CHUNG Michael | 20% | 43% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 32 | NGO Ethan | 14% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 33 | LEE Chun Po | 11% | 36% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 34 | PAK Elliot | 16% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 35 | CHEN Brian | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 36 | LEE Jaden T. | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 37 | MENDOZA Zander | 2% | 14% | 36% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 38 | LO Jake | 1% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 18% | 3% | |
| 39 | COPEN Samuel S. | 24% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 40 | KIM Sullivan | 30% | 45% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 41 | LIPSHUTZ Zachary | 21% | 42% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 42 | SACHS Sebastian | 16% | 40% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 42 | GUPTA-GARCIA Krish | 56% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 44 | COPEN Elliot P. | 26% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.