Pasadena, CA - Pasadena, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | LIN Kyran | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% | |
2 | CHUNG Thomas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 30% | 6% |
3 | MOSES Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 39% |
3 | HUNT Aidan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 19% | |
5 | MENDOZA Zachari | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% | |
6 | JAIN Aditya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 35% | 6% |
7 | ZHU Max | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 27% |
8 | BRUSKOTTER Reiland | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 26% | 4% | |
9 | THOMPSON Chester | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 5% |
10 | KIM Darius H. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 36% | 7% | |
11 | JIN daniel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 39% | |
12 | GILLISON Edward L. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
13 | WANG DEVON | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 43% | 8% | |
14 | DEKERMANJI Christopher | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 24% | |
15 | KOPPE Alexander | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 4% | |
16 | GUPTA-GARCIA Raj | 100% | 82% | 37% | 6% | - | - | |
17 | DRIBIN Ezra | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 54% | 11% | |
18 | NOEL Sebastien A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% | 25% | |
19 | ALFARO Justus | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 34% | 6% | |
20 | LAGARNIA Luke | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% | |
21 | DALVA Michael | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 29% | 4% | |
22 | EVANS noah | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 8% | 1% | |
23 | MCDONALD Ethan | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 10% | 1% | |
24 | FERRIERE Joshua | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
25 | DAO Alexander | 100% | 93% | 60% | 21% | 3% | - | |
26 | BAZHENOV Anthony | 100% | 96% | 71% | 30% | 6% | - | |
27 | SCHROEDER Dylan | 100% | 97% | 82% | 51% | 21% | 4% | - |
28 | CROSSMAN Brandon | 100% | 76% | 32% | 6% | - | - | |
29 | SAMY David | 100% | 93% | 60% | 19% | 2% | - | |
30 | BARRESI Isaac | 100% | 62% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
31 | CHUNG Michael | 100% | 80% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
32 | NGO Ethan | 100% | 86% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | |
33 | LEE Chun Po | 100% | 89% | 53% | 16% | 2% | - | |
34 | PAK Elliot | 100% | 84% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | |
35 | CHEN Brian | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
36 | LEE Jaden T. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
37 | MENDOZA Zander | 100% | 98% | 85% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - |
38 | LO Jake | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 20% | 3% | |
39 | COPEN Samuel S. | 100% | 76% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | |
40 | KIM Sullivan | 100% | 70% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
41 | LIPSHUTZ Zachary | 100% | 79% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | |
42 | SACHS Sebastian | 100% | 84% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - | |
42 | GUPTA-GARCIA Krish | 100% | 44% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
44 | COPEN Elliot P. | 100% | 74% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.