Chatsworth, CA - Chatsworth, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BURKE Spencer W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 72% |
| 2 | OH Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 48% |
| 3 | GODZHIK Zachary | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 32% |
| 3 | GOBBO Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 26% | |
| 5 | DANKAR Neel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 26% | |
| 6 | LUH Ethan K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 24% | |
| 7 | JAIN Aditya | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 53% | |
| 8 | LI Ryan Z. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 9 | YAKUSHKIN Ernest D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 47% | |
| 10 | RYOU Aiden | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 8% | |
| 11 | WU Jerry Z. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 38% | 7% | |
| 12 | DETERING Julian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 39% | 6% |
| 13 | BAEK David | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 37% | 4% |
| 14 | KANG Anthony Jaegu | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 50% | 10% |
| 15 | LI Avery Peihong | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 4% | |
| 16 | NAYGAS LAWRENCE I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% | 20% | |
| 17 | KIM Derek A. | 100% | 100% | 91% | 61% | 22% | 3% | |
| 18 | KIM Ryan Y. | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% | |
| 19 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 24% | |
| 20 | NAM Michael | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 37% | 7% | - |
| 21 | LE Jacob W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 31% | 6% |
| 22 | ZHOU Oscar J. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 39% | 7% | |
| 23 | MUSHER Benjamin J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 39% | |
| 24 | TAN Peter | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 8% | - |
| 25 | OH Jaden | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 26 | LAKE Wyatt J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 12% | 1% |
| 27 | BAUER Roman | 100% | 95% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 28 | SIU Aiden | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 42% | 8% | |
| 29 | WONG Luke S. | 100% | 99% | 85% | 43% | 8% | - | |
| 30 | CANLAS Nathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 17% | |
| 31 | PARK Gabriel | 100% | 93% | 48% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | LLIDO Soren | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 33 | KHVANG Sebastien T. | 100% | 96% | 68% | 25% | 4% | - | |
| 34 | LEE Dylan | 100% | 96% | 67% | 24% | 3% | - | |
| 35 | ZHENG Zhe | 100% | 100% | 92% | 56% | 13% | 1% | |
| 36 | WONG Antonio | 100% | 98% | 80% | 38% | 9% | 1% | |
| 37 | KIM Aiden | 100% | 87% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 38 | SUEDA Connor | 100% | 98% | 74% | 28% | 5% | - | |
| 39 | BRENNAN Ty | 100% | 67% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 40 | SHEN Owen | 100% | 97% | 67% | 26% | 5% | - | |
| 41 | UHM RYAN | 100% | 99% | 87% | 52% | 16% | 2% | |
| 42 | FRCEK Armand A. | 100% | 87% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
| 43 | ULLOA Trent J. | 100% | 93% | 55% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
| 44 | JI Evan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 8% | |
| 45 | HUANG Kevin D. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 56% | 16% | 1% | |
| 46 | QIU Jay (Tengjie) | 100% | 66% | 15% | 1% | - | - | |
| 47 | RAINS Jackson T. | 100% | 35% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 48 | CHU Colin | 100% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 49 | KHODYAKOV Nikolai | 100% | 40% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 50 | RYOU Andy | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 51 | DE LA FUENTE Ian | 100% | 94% | 53% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 52 | AGRAWAL Niki | 100% | 64% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 53 | PARK Sky | 100% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - | |
| 54 | GRAPHIA Gabriel | 100% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | |
| 54 | SANCHEZ William | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 15% | 2% | |
| 56 | WU James | 100% | 94% | 56% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 56 | EDISON Ansel | 100% | 45% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.