Nashville, TN - Nashville, TN, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | XIAO Enoch A. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.8 | 6 | +0.2 |
| 2 | ZHANG Andy W. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
| 3 | GRIFFITH JACK | D V V V V | V V V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 3 | MITCHELL Philip D. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
| 5 | XIAO Ethan J. | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.9 | 6 | +0.1 |
| 6 | KEE Andrew L. | V V V D V V | V V D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 7 | SONG Leonardo T. | V V V D V | V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 8 | SICHITIU Alexander | V D V V D V | V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 9 | CHOUN Samuel Minwook | V V V V V V | V D | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
| 10 | LEE Jacob | V V V V D V | V D | 1.8 | 5 | +3.2 |
| 11 | ZHAO Dylan L. | V V D V V | V D | 1.8 | 4 | +2.2 |
| 12 | WILLIAMS Connor J. | D V D V V V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 13 | GRAHAM Roy J. | D V V V V D | V D | 5.0 | 4 | -1.0 |
| 14 | OH SEAN | V D V V V D | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 15 | TANG Owen S. | D V V D V V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 16 | KNIZHNIK David | D D D V V D | V V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 17 | ALLAMPALLAM Maanav V. | V D V V V V | D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 18 | GATZA Logan | V V D V V D | D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 19 | GORBACHEV Alexander | D V V V V D | D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 20 | SYLVESTER William Z. | D D V V D V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 21 | GRASS James D. | D V D V V D | D | 1.6 | 3 | +1.4 |
| 22 | LEE Lukas | V V D D V D | D | 2.1 | 3 | +0.9 |
| 23 | WECHSLER Jacob | D D V D V V | D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 24 | COLLUM Thomas | V D V D V D | D | 1.5 | 3 | +1.5 |
| 25 | PAN Henry | D D D V V D | V D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 26 | QUINTERO Julian | D D D V D V | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 27 | EMENHEISER Conrad | V V D D D D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 28 | IVANENKO Alex | V V D D D D | V D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 29 | WANG Brayden | V D D D D V | V D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 30 | FIGUEROA ANDRES | D D V D D | V D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 31 | WONG Garrick G. | D D D V D | V D | 2.8 | 1 | -1.8 |
| 32 | LI Matthew | V D D D D | V D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 33 | AMMON Blue | D D D D D V | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 34 | ORLOV Dmitriy | V D D D D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 35 | FERNANDEZ Santiago Martin | D D V D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 36 | THROCKMORTON Robert | D V D D D D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 37 | DEMIR Omer | D V D D D D | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 38 | ZOU Yuming | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
| 39 | LEE EUNSOO | D D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
| 40 | LEE EUNJAE | D D D D D D | D | 1.7 | 0 | -1.7 |
| 41 | BURKETT Jackson Cash | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.