Nashville, TN - Nashville, TN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | XIAO Enoch A. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 18% | 81% |
2 | ZHANG Andy W. | - | - | - | - | 11% | 45% | 44% |
3 | GRIFFITH JACK | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 29% | |
3 | MITCHELL Philip D. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 57% |
5 | XIAO Ethan J. | - | - | - | - | - | 11% | 88% |
6 | KEE Andrew L. | - | - | 4% | 25% | 44% | 24% | 2% |
7 | SONG Leonardo T. | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% | |
8 | SICHITIU Alexander | - | - | 1% | 10% | 50% | 34% | 6% |
9 | CHOUN Samuel Minwook | - | - | - | - | 3% | 29% | 67% |
10 | LEE Jacob | 7% | 33% | 38% | 18% | 4% | < 1% | - |
11 | ZHAO Dylan L. | 9% | 31% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | |
12 | WILLIAMS Connor J. | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 37% | 16% | 2% |
13 | GRAHAM Roy J. | - | - | - | 2% | 22% | 51% | 26% |
14 | OH SEAN | - | - | 2% | 15% | 44% | 36% | 3% |
15 | TANG Owen S. | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 40% | 18% | 1% |
16 | KNIZHNIK David | - | 7% | 31% | 50% | 11% | 1% | - |
17 | ALLAMPALLAM Maanav V. | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 19% | 3% |
18 | GATZA Logan | - | - | 2% | 15% | 39% | 37% | 7% |
19 | GORBACHEV Alexander | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 42% | 25% | 1% |
20 | SYLVESTER William Z. | - | 6% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 5% | - |
21 | GRASS James D. | 13% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
22 | LEE Lukas | 4% | 24% | 40% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
23 | WECHSLER Jacob | - | - | 5% | 25% | 47% | 20% | 2% |
24 | COLLUM Thomas | 12% | 37% | 37% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
25 | PAN Henry | 21% | 45% | 27% | 6% | - | - | - |
26 | QUINTERO Julian | 10% | 36% | 39% | 15% | 1% | - | - |
27 | EMENHEISER Conrad | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | - |
28 | IVANENKO Alex | 27% | 46% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - |
29 | WANG Brayden | 16% | 42% | 33% | 8% | - | - | - |
30 | FIGUEROA ANDRES | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | |
31 | WONG Garrick G. | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 4% | |
32 | LI Matthew | 7% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - | |
33 | AMMON Blue | 16% | 44% | 34% | 6% | - | - | - |
34 | ORLOV Dmitriy | 7% | 32% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
35 | FERNANDEZ Santiago Martin | 5% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
36 | THROCKMORTON Robert | 2% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 14% | 1% | - |
37 | DEMIR Omer | 5% | 26% | 42% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
38 | ZOU Yuming | 9% | 34% | 39% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
39 | LEE EUNSOO | 7% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
40 | LEE EUNJAE | 10% | 33% | 39% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
41 | BURKETT Jackson Cash | 48% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.