400 N High Street, OH - 400 N High Street, OH, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GORNOVSKY David J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% |
| 2 | PEDERSEN Trevor W. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 49% | 10% | |
| 3 | FULLERTON Houston T. | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 37% | 9% | |
| 3 | MARTIN Nathan C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 43% | |
| 5 | LI Jesse | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% |
| 6 | IVAKIMOV Vasil | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 51% | 13% | |
| 7 | DAVIES Morgan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 26% | |
| 8 | MARTIN Liam N. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 36% | 6% | |
| 9 | EDWARDS Ethan S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 44% | 8% | |
| 10 | GLASS Timothy C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 10% | |
| 11 | NORTH Gary S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 19% |
| 12 | GUINAN Joseph | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 41% | 9% |
| 13 | WANG William | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 12% |
| 14 | KENT Dwain | 100% | 90% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 15 | BEACH John | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 2% | |
| 16 | SHERWOOD Dominic | 100% | 100% | 92% | 63% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 17 | CHAWLA Armaan | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% | |
| 18 | RHYU Kozmo | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 19 | RODACHY Jeffrey M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 34% | 3% |
| 20 | JOVANOVIC Jovan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 49% | |
| 21 | UKOLOV Dimitri | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 4% |
| 22 | HAYENGA Gary M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 15% | |
| 23 | WOJCIECHOWSKI Matthew N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 46% | |
| 24 | SHAH S Ayush | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 7% | |
| 25 | PICK Ian | 100% | 94% | 59% | 17% | 2% | - | |
| 26 | WINTERSHEIMER Adam | 100% | 95% | 72% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
| 27 | HANXU Richard A. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 13% | 2% |
| 28 | TEITENBERG John F. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 29 | O’DEA Anthony | 100% | 91% | 56% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 30 | MCDONNELL Michael | 100% | 93% | 61% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 31 | ROTONDI Gregory V. | 100% | 96% | 78% | 43% | 14% | 2% | |
| 32 | ELLINGTON Keegan A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 36% | 6% | |
| 33 | SWANSON Dave | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 34 | SINGH Anil | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 35 | CULLEN Daniel F. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% | |
| 36 | KLINE R. Jay | 100% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 7% | - | |
| 37 | HERMANSON David B. | 100% | 91% | 56% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 38 | GISLER Benjamin B. | 100% | 91% | 57% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 39 | STEIBER Zane T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 23% | |
| 40 | MOORE Gabriel | 100% | 54% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
| 41 | EDWARDS Tim | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 42 | SIVAKUMAR Ajit | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 43 | WANG Albert | 100% | 95% | 63% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 44 | YANG Brandon | 100% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 45 | VISURAKAPALLI Sathvik | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 31% | 6% | |
| 46 | MA Bochen | 100% | 93% | 66% | 28% | 6% | - | |
| 47 | HONG James | 100% | 86% | 51% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 48 | PARKS Robert | 100% | 78% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | |
| 49 | O'BRIEN Timothy S. | 100% | 79% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 50 | WHEELER Mark C. | 100% | 95% | 74% | 38% | 11% | 1% | |
| 51 | STEFANOV Michael A. | 100% | 61% | 18% | 2% | - | - | |
| 52 | MARTIN Dirk | 100% | 84% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 53 | KENT Matthew | 100% | 59% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 54 | LANDIS Geoffrey A. | 100% | 31% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 55 | DICKSON Tim | 100% | 89% | 50% | 12% | 1% | - | |
| 56 | WILLIAMS Richard | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 57 | FITZGERALD Aidan | 100% | 62% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.