San Diego, CA - San Diego, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | FUKUDA Renzo K. | V D V V D V | V V V V V V | 4.7 | 4 | -0.7 |
2 | MUSHER Benjamin J. | V V V V V D | V V V V V D | 5.2 | 5 | -0.2 |
3 | YU Anders | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
3 | JEON Caleb A. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.6 | 6 | +1.4 |
5 | STRUGAR Marcus A. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
6 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.2 | 6 | +1.8 |
7 | COELHO Cristiano P. | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
8 | WOO Christian | D D D V D V | V V V V D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
9 | BANERJEE ANUP | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.5 | 6 | +0.5 |
10 | JAIN Aditya | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
11 | TSAY Jeremy M. | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 6 | +1.8 |
12 | LI Richard | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.0 | 6 | +1.0 |
13 | LI Peihong | D V V V V V | V V D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
14 | LAKE Wyatt J. | V D V V V V | V V D | 3.5 | 5 | +1.5 |
15 | HOOSHI Jayden C. | V V V D V V | V V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
16 | GOBBO Alexander | V V V D V D | V V V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
17 | YAKUSHKIN Ernest D. | V V V V V V | V D | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
18 | BAO Aaron | V V V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 6 | +2.2 |
19 | CHIN Julian S. | V V V V V V | V D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
20 | PIESNER Zachary C. | V V V V V D | V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
21 | PAI Lakshan K. | V V D V V V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
22 | KANG Anthony Jaegu | V V V V D V | V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
23 | GOOR Julian | D V V V V V | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
24 | NG Eben S. | V V V V D | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
25 | KHER Roan | V D V V D V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
26 | MASCARI DUMONT Louis | D V V V V D | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
27 | HOSKERI Anik S. | V V V D V D | V D | 0.9 | 4 | +3.1 |
28 | ZHOU Oscar J. | V D V V V D | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
29 | ZHANG Jiening G. | V V D V V D | V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
30 | TAN Christien | D V V V D V | V V D | 2.5 | 4 | +1.5 |
31 | WONG Antonio | D V D V D V | V V D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
32 | CANLAS Nathan | D V D V D V | V V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
33 | LO Conrad | V V V V V V | D | 4.2 | 6 | +1.8 |
34 | ZHAI Jeffrey | D V V V V V | D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
35 | ANTON Nathaniel | V V V D V V | D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
36 | LYNCH Owen C. | V V V V D V | D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
37 | SHEN Owen | V D D V V V | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
38 | CHOU Jared T. | V V D D V V | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
39 | DETERING Julian | D D V V V V | V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
40 | WANG Ethan | V D D V V V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
41 | MA Andrew | V V V V D D | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
42 | SADOVSKY Leor B. | V D V V D V | V D | 2.8 | 4 | +1.2 |
43 | CHIRASHNYA Daniel | V D V D V V | V D | 5.1 | 4 | -1.1 |
44 | KIM Jackson | V V V D V D | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
45 | OH Joshua | V V D D V V | V D | 1.4 | 4 | +2.6 |
46 | LLOYD henry | D V V D V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
47 | NGUYEN Liam | V D V V D D | V D | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
48 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | V D V D V D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
49 | FINNEY Lorenz | D D D V V V | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
50 | LEE Christopher T. | V V D D D V | V D | 4.9 | 3 | -1.9 |
51 | WU Lucas | V V D D D V | V D | 4.5 | 3 | -1.5 |
52 | DINSAY Kristjan | D V D D V V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
53 | TAN Peter | V D D V D V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
54 | KRYLTSOV Michael | D D D V V D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
55 | BAUER Roman | V V D D D D | V D | 4.1 | 2 | -2.1 |
56 | CHEN Jaden K. | D D V V D D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
57 | SOTO-ULEV Aden A. | V D V D D D | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
57 | LLIDO Soren | D V D D V D | V D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
59 | RENTERIA Emiliano | D V D D V D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
60 | OROSZLAN Benjamin | D V D V D D | V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
61 | TEH Ryan | D D V D D V | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
62 | RUBIN Max | D D D V D | V D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
63 | ZHOU Hao Kai (Kevin) | V D D D D D | V D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
63 | MA Bryant | D D D D V D | V D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
65 | WONG Matthew H. | V D D D V | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
66 | KIM Aiden | D D V D V D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
67 | SUEDA Connor | D V D D V D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
67 | NORIEGA Julian | D D D V V D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
69 | KIM Harrison | D D V D V D | D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
70 | CORTRIGHT Skipper (Matthew) | V D D D V D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
71 | MAK Osman K. | D D V V D D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
72 | ZUO Ethan | D D V D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
73 | ZHONG Alan D. | D V D D D D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
74 | SHAPHIR Liad | D D D D V D | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
75 | BAEK David | D D D D D V | D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
76 | LI Jett | D D D D D V | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
77 | LO Preston | D D D V D D | D | 3.0 | 1 | -2.0 |
78 | OH Jaden | D V D D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
79 | CHEN Justin K. | D D D V D D | D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
80 | CHENG Jonathan | D D D V D D | D | 3.3 | 1 | -2.3 |
80 | MYERS Dean | D V D D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
82 | ZHENG zhe | V D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
82 | DE LA FUENTE Ian | D D D V D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
84 | TAN Peyton | V D D D D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
85 | ZENG Chuyi | D D V D D D | D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
86 | NG Micah | D D D D V D | D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
87 | FRCEK Armand A. | D D D D D V | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
88 | TUAN Evan | V D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
89 | FRANC Geoffrey C. | D D D D D V | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
90 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | D V D D D D | D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
91 | FUKUDA Diego | D D D D D D | D | 2.6 | 0 | -2.6 |
92 | SHPOLYANSKY Jax F. | D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
93 | BHARADWAJ Venkatesh | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
93 | AGRAWAL Niki | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
95 | RAJ Jay | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
96 | AGEYEV Aleksey | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
97 | CHEN Tyler | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.