San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | YAMASAKI Kyle A. | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 45% |
| 2 | NGUYEN Ethan D. | - | - | - | - | 1% | 14% | 85% |
| 3 | ARIETA Ryan T. | - | - | - | 3% | 20% | 46% | 32% |
| 3 | KULIGOWSKI Bartosz | - | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 39% | 14% |
| 5 | DESOUZA Hansel S. | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 5% |
| 6 | MIELE Benjamin | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 35% |
| 7 | JOHNSON Lucas W. | - | 2% | 10% | 29% | 39% | 20% | |
| 8 | LEI Jacob | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 35% | 28% | 8% |
| 9 | KIM PAUL | - | - | 4% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% |
| 10 | SUVOROV Yuly | - | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 42% | 29% |
| 11 | ALLGEIER Peter | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
| 11 | LEVY Zachari I. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
| 13 | SHIREY Daniel L. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 7% |
| 14 | WONG Nicholas A. | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
| 15 | HABIB Farooq | - | - | 7% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 5% |
| 16 | JIN Nicholas | - | 1% | 5% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 6% |
| 17 | CAI Kevin P. | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% |
| 18 | NG Alexander M. | 2% | 12% | 26% | 31% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
| 19 | MENEGOLI Lorenzo | - | - | 1% | 10% | 34% | 42% | 14% |
| 20 | SHARMA Sanil | - | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
| 21 | SMITH Justin C. | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 40% | 43% |
| 22 | MATTIS George | 2% | 11% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 23 | GARRETT Samuel | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% |
| 24 | SHUR Yakov C. | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 28% | 8% | |
| 25 | DE JONG Thijmen J. | - | 2% | 9% | 24% | 34% | 25% | 7% |
| 26 | GREEN Ummi | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 27 | LOGUE Ethan D. | 1% | 5% | 16% | 29% | 30% | 16% | 4% |
| 28 | BOYCE Samuel H. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 43% | 34% | |
| 29 | GREEN Jabreel | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
| 30 | DESSAUER Tobyn M. | - | 9% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 5% | 1% |
| 31 | HELGE James R. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
| 32 | WISOFF Jeffrey | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 34% | 30% | 10% |
| 33 | KILUK Andrew | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 1% |
| 34 | LIANG Aaron | - | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 32% | 11% |
| 35 | LOUIE Jason | 1% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% |
| 36 | SIVAGAR Leo | - | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 8% | |
| 37 | NGUYEN Steven | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% |
| 38 | BRUCE II Ommer E. | - | 6% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 7% | - |
| 39 | ROOD Alex | - | 5% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 6% | |
| 40 | VELUVALI Vivek S. | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | |
| 41 | WRIGHT Christopher | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 42 | DYER Carson C. | 5% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 43 | KAUFMAN Joel H. | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 14% | 2% |
| 44 | WEAVER Neil | 1% | 9% | 24% | 32% | 23% | 9% | 1% |
| 45 | SLOAN Ryan | 6% | 21% | 33% | 26% | 12% | 3% | - |
| 46 | BECK Brian C. | 1% | 13% | 35% | 34% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 47 | MAYCHROWITZ Matt | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 48 | JOSEPH William | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 49 | CHON Joshua | 1% | 17% | 39% | 31% | 10% | 1% | |
| 50 | RAJPAL Sartaj S. | 1% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 20% | 4% | |
| 51 | ZIEBART Jeremy J. | - | 3% | 26% | 42% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 52 | AU Marcus J. | 1% | 6% | 19% | 31% | 27% | 13% | 2% |
| 53 | PERKA Michael | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% |
| 54 | LEVITSKY Jonathan | 6% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 54 | LUCERO-OLSON Aydin | 1% | 5% | 17% | 30% | 29% | 15% | 3% |
| 56 | ZAYDMAN David M. | 9% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 57 | KUO Elvin | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 12% | - |
| 58 | SMITH Zane A. | 5% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 59 | MILEY Nick N. | 18% | 39% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 60 | PARK Elliot | 18% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 61 | ALVAREZ Ian T. | 4% | 33% | 39% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 62 | WICKBOLDT Eric | - | 17% | 37% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 63 | BARAFF David | 13% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 64 | GNERRE Sante | 37% | 41% | 18% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 65 | TORVINEN Trevor J. | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% |
| 66 | KIM Benjamin I. | - | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% |
| 67 | ZHUANG William | 13% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 68 | RYAN Christopher | 4% | 29% | 40% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 69 | MA Victor | 5% | 22% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 70 | WILLIS Alan T. | 2% | 28% | 41% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 71 | ZHANG Alec | 2% | 12% | 26% | 31% | 20% | 7% | 1% |
| 72 | LEONARDINI Barry M. | 14% | 40% | 32% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 73 | ROUSE Joseph (Joe) T. | 2% | 13% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 73 | ATHAVALE Pranav | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 75 | DYER CJ | - | 3% | 25% | 42% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 76 | DOWNEY Gerard C. | 3% | 16% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | |
| 77 | QUIROGA Kyle | 66% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 78 | RYAN Seth C. | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 13% | 2% |
| 79 | WONG Nathan | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 80 | BAGCHI Aritra | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 81 | BEITTEL David F. | 23% | 39% | 27% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
| 82 | BURLING Trenor | 68% | 29% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 83 | PATERSON Owen | 81% | 17% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 84 | ZHANG Andrew | 18% | 62% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 85 | LIPTON Michael D. | 16% | 37% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 86 | ZANKOWSKI Brendan | 36% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 87 | HASAN Raamis | 79% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 88 | GUPTA Karan | 21% | 41% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 89 | WANG Andrew | 97% | 3% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.