Junior Olympic Championships

Cadet Women's Foil

Sunday, February 16, 2020 at 2:00 PM

Columbus, OH - Columbus, OH, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 CHENG Evelyn - - - - 4% 27% 69%
2 JING Alexandra - - - - 5% 29% 66%
3 LAM Justina - - - - 5% 29% 66%
3 APELIAN Katherine - - - 4% 21% 45% 30%
5 QIAN Crystal - - - 1% 10% 38% 51%
6 KONG Chin-Yi - - - 3% 21% 46% 29%
7 HOOSHI Erica S. - - - 2% 12% 40% 45%
8 CAO Arianna L. - - 5% 22% 44% 29%
9 CONWAY Josephina (JoJo) J. - - - 3% 17% 42% 38%
10 AHN Gabriella - - - - 4% 27% 69%
11 KOO Rachel A. - - - 1% 11% 39% 48%
12 ZHENG Vivian - - - 1% 10% 37% 51%
13 LEE Allison (Allie) - - - - 5% 32% 63%
14 FLANAGAN Catherine H. - - - 4% 21% 45% 30%
15 HO Brianna W. - - 2% 13% 33% 37% 14%
16 JING Emily - - 1% 7% 27% 42% 23%
17 PARK Rowan M. - - - 2% 13% 40% 46%
18 CASTANEDA Erika L. - - 1% 10% 31% 40% 18%
19 LESLIE Ryanne T. - - - 3% 19% 44% 34%
20 CHUSID Renata M. - - - 1% 6% 31% 62%
20 LEE Alina - - - 3% 17% 42% 38%
22 GRIFFIN Emma G. - - - 2% 21% 49% 28%
23 MASSICK Laine - - - 3% 16% 42% 40%
23 HALL Velma - - - 7% 29% 44% 20%
25 WU Irene M. - 3% 16% 37% 33% 11% 1%
26 IBEN Claire L. - 1% 7% 29% 45% 18%
27 DUAN Konnie - 2% 18% 43% 31% 7%
28 WANG Ellen - - - 4% 26% 46% 23%
29 YU Seneca - - 4% 18% 37% 32% 8%
30 SARTORI Taylor M. - 3% 22% 42% 27% 5%
31 LI Grace Q. - - - 2% 14% 43% 42%
32 LAU Chloe M. - 1% 8% 28% 40% 22% 2%
33 CHO Taylor S. - - 4% 22% 41% 29% 4%
34 SADAN Jordan E. - - 1% 8% 31% 45% 16%
35 SHEN Sophia H. - - 2% 15% 44% 40%
36 CHEN Jia P. - - - 5% 26% 45% 23%
37 NOVOSELTSEVA Anna V. - - - - 1% 20% 78%
38 KHOO Lauren A. - - 2% 17% 40% 33% 8%
39 XU Christine - - 6% 27% 42% 21% 3%
40 FREEDMAN Miranda W. - - - 3% 19% 45% 32%
41 KNIGHT Skylar - - - 3% 15% 41% 41%
42 SEAL Grace (Gracie) C. - 1% 7% 28% 40% 21% 3%
43 JO Mia C. - - 1% 9% 35% 48% 7%
44 COSTELLO Angeline S. - 1% 9% 28% 37% 21% 4%
45 ALTEN Ayaka - - 3% 19% 42% 32% 4%
46 MILLER Naomi E. - - 3% 18% 43% 32% 5%
47 ADAMS KIM Natalie - 6% 26% 38% 24% 6% 1%
47 FERRETTI Anna Rebecca - - 4% 17% 36% 34% 9%
49 XU Madison - 2% 16% 37% 33% 11% 1%
50 GALAVOTTI Claire Teresa - - 7% 31% 44% 18%
51 KIM Rachael - - 3% 19% 45% 33%
52 GAYDOS Sofia C. - - 4% 20% 44% 32%
53 CHEN Allison V. - 5% 26% 40% 24% 5%
54 LIAO Lu Jia (Lucy) - 1% 8% 31% 43% 16%
55 AHN Isabella - - 2% 12% 31% 38% 17%
56 PALMER Meredith K. - 1% 12% 38% 35% 13% 2%
57 KOENIG Charlotte R. - - 1% 12% 33% 39% 15%
58 OUYANG Bridgette Z. - - 6% 26% 40% 23% 4%
59 DU Hannah - 3% 18% 37% 31% 10% 1%
60 TALWALKAR Apoorva - - 2% 16% 46% 30% 5%
61 KLINE Melissa C. - - 6% 23% 39% 27% 5%
62 TONG Ophelia - 1% 10% 31% 39% 17% 1%
63 YHIP Mikaela M. - - 4% 23% 41% 26% 6%
64 FAN Elaine - - 7% 27% 40% 22% 3%
65 HUNG Juliana K. - - - 1% 11% 39% 49%
66 CHOI Lenna K. - - - 1% 8% 35% 57%
67 SERBAN Samantha M. - - - 1% 16% 47% 36%
67 SHEN Jasmine N. - - 1% 8% 29% 42% 20%
69 ZHENG Ivy - - - 2% 13% 40% 45%
70 DE LA CRUZ Eden - 2% 21% 41% 28% 8% 1%
71 LI Phoebe J. - - 1% 6% 27% 43% 23%
72 CHEN Kelly - - 5% 24% 40% 26% 4%
73 LUNG Katerina - - - 5% 25% 46% 23%
74 BRADFORD Meeah - 1% 5% 20% 38% 30% 6%
75 OH Erin H. - 1% 5% 22% 38% 28% 6%
76 ZHANG Alina C. - 1% 10% 31% 38% 18% 3%
77 CHO Gracie L. - 1% 12% 36% 38% 13%
78 HEISER Anna M. 22% 44% 28% 6% 1% -
79 PEVZNER Victoria - - - 3% 17% 42% 38%
80 NEWHARD Zelia K. - - 6% 27% 42% 22% 2%
81 KIM Katherine - 1% 10% 38% 38% 13% 2%
82 PERLMAN Talia - 1% 8% 28% 40% 21% 2%
83 DAVIA Daniella V. - - 2% 13% 34% 38% 12%
84 LEE Brianna J. - - 2% 10% 30% 40% 18%
84 LI Meilin - 1% 5% 22% 39% 28% 6%
86 PRIETO Sofia M. - 8% 27% 37% 22% 6% -
87 CEPERO Rosabel - 1% 9% 28% 37% 21% 4%
88 SHITAMOTO Audrey F. 1% 10% 29% 35% 20% 5% -
89 WU Kyra - 2% 11% 31% 36% 17% 3%
90 KIM Elisabeth (Gracie) - - 3% 15% 36% 36% 10%
90 KOSTELNY Alexis - 2% 14% 33% 35% 15% 1%
92 ACHILOVA Feyza - - 7% 32% 41% 18% 2%
93 LOCKE Savannah - - 5% 23% 42% 25% 5%
93 JANG Kimberley - - 1% 12% 36% 39% 12%
95 YIN Helen - 2% 15% 40% 34% 8% -
96 SHIH Diane 1% 6% 21% 36% 27% 9% 1%
97 LAMBERT Mahala - 5% 22% 36% 27% 9% 1%
98 HECKMANN Emma - - 3% 20% 39% 30% 7%
99 ATLURI Srija - 6% 25% 37% 24% 7% 1%
100 SENIC Adeline - - 4% 24% 42% 25% 5%
101 TRAN Ava D. - 3% 14% 32% 34% 15% 2%
102 REN Olivia Y. - - 2% 15% 43% 40%
102 CHEN Nicole Y. - 2% 13% 35% 38% 13%
104 WEBB Ella 3% 36% 41% 17% 3% -
105 SLOWINSKI Maia A. - 10% 35% 37% 15% 2%
106 SHAW Kayla M. - - 5% 21% 39% 29% 5%
107 CHO Cameron S. - 3% 18% 35% 31% 12% 1%
108 KONG Olivia - - 5% 24% 39% 25% 6%
109 DING Abigail - 2% 17% 38% 31% 10% 1%
110 BOODELL Ella - 2% 14% 36% 34% 13% 1%
110 CHENG Lydia A. - - 3% 17% 42% 31% 7%
112 DEBACK Greta I. - 1% 10% 30% 38% 18% 2%
113 XU Marie-Anne J. - 12% 32% 35% 17% 4% -
114 JEWETT Jamie - 1% 10% 35% 38% 14% 2%
114 SOOD Ishani S. - - 2% 14% 37% 37% 9%
116 CHO Rebecca H. - 3% 18% 36% 31% 11% 1%
117 PENG Amber L. - 5% 23% 38% 26% 7% -
118 SUH Kailey E. - 1% 9% 31% 39% 18% 2%
119 YEH Marissa E. - 3% 13% 32% 35% 15% 2%
120 ZHAO Sophie L. - 7% 31% 39% 19% 4% -
121 BOLES Sophia 2% 27% 46% 21% 4% - -
122 SEO IRENE Y. - 8% 30% 37% 20% 5% -
123 PAHLAVI Dahlia - 7% 40% 39% 13% 1%
124 LIU Alice M. - 7% 30% 42% 18% 2%
125 LIU Jaelyn A. - 2% 22% 40% 28% 8% 1%
126 KIM Hyunchae Y. - 10% 33% 38% 16% 3% -
127 DRANOVSKY Dasha - 6% 25% 37% 24% 7% 1%
128 ROMERO Sophia 6% 30% 43% 18% 3% - -
129 MUELLER Tatum J. 2% 14% 33% 33% 15% 3% -
130 WEINTRAUB Io H. - 1% 9% 34% 39% 14% 2%
131 LEE Isabelle - 4% 20% 38% 29% 8% 1%
132 EYER Hailey M. - 2% 14% 39% 36% 9% -
133 LEE Bethany W. - - 3% 18% 42% 32% 5%
134 LUU Shanon K. - 2% 11% 31% 36% 17% 2%
135 SULEIMAN Alysa J. - 2% 15% 40% 33% 9% 1%
136 DRAGNE Alexis D. 1% 14% 40% 34% 10% 1%
137 VONA Elena M. - 7% 33% 40% 18% 3%
138 VOHRA Anusha - 2% 17% 39% 32% 10% 1%
139 KOROL Dana - 5% 23% 38% 26% 8% 1%
140 CHUSID Mikayla - - 5% 23% 41% 27% 3%
141 FERNANDES Thea - 2% 13% 33% 35% 15% 2%
142 YE Eileen - - 5% 23% 41% 27% 5%
143 SCHUEPPERT Amelia V. 4% 39% 39% 15% 3% - -
144 HIRSCH Sophie A. - 4% 44% 39% 12% 1% -
145 HO Rachel E. - 11% 35% 36% 15% 3% -
146 BATRA Chaahat - 3% 14% 34% 34% 14% 2%
147 BASSIK Eva 1% 9% 38% 37% 13% 2% -
148 LEE Ariana - 3% 21% 43% 27% 6% -
149 MCKEE Alexandra K. 2% 27% 43% 23% 5% - -
150 SCHATZ Erika J. 1% 15% 38% 33% 12% 2% -
151 LOGAN Jade 2% 23% 45% 25% 5% - -
152 JIANG Yangying (Amanda) - 5% 27% 43% 20% 3% -
153 HOLLE Aviella S. 3% 18% 36% 30% 11% 2% -
154 TAN Clarisse 1% 9% 34% 37% 16% 3% -
155 COMPTON Catherine 5% 24% 38% 25% 7% 1% -
156 HUANG NATALIE - 2% 18% 42% 29% 8% 1%
157 XUE Alanna - 4% 20% 36% 29% 9% 1%
158 SIMPSON Lydia Q. 1% 10% 33% 41% 13% 1% -
159 LEE Bethanie 1% 9% 27% 36% 22% 5% -
160 BAKER-ROSENBERG Raynor S. 3% 23% 41% 26% 7% 1% -
161 KOROL Neta 1% 6% 26% 41% 23% 4%
162 SASSE Savitri A. 16% 40% 32% 10% 1% -
163 TAN Kaitlyn N. - 1% 8% 27% 37% 22% 5%
164 LIN Joyce 1% 16% 52% 26% 5% - -
165 KUMAR Anmol 4% 31% 43% 18% 3% - -
166 MICHAELSEN Emily 1% 6% 22% 35% 27% 9% 1%
167 YU Jaime L. - 5% 33% 40% 19% 3% -
168 CHON Sydney 6% 25% 36% 24% 8% 1% -
169 MAESTRADO Ashley R. 6% 33% 42% 16% 2% - -
170 MI Anning 4% 33% 41% 19% 4% - -
171 SALINAS Jessica L. 1% 17% 41% 30% 9% 1% -
172 YU Lauren C. 2% 15% 33% 32% 14% 3% -
173 PAVE Claire 2% 17% 45% 29% 7% 1% -
174 YOUNG Audrey S. 7% 42% 37% 13% 2% - -
174 WANG Chloe - 2% 18% 41% 31% 8% -
176 XIANG Emma - 10% 44% 35% 10% 1% -
177 WALLACE Susannah 16% 41% 33% 9% 1% - -
178 CLOWES Madison 6% 40% 40% 12% 1% - -
179 ZHUANG Sophie 22% 51% 24% 4% - - -
180 TAI Valerie 71% 26% 3% - - - -
181 RASO Olivia 12% 37% 35% 14% 2% - -
182 CABALU Alaina 18% 58% 22% 3% - - -
183 OTEYZA Camille 14% 44% 33% 8% 1% - -
184 PFLAUM Philippa J. 23% 64% 12% 1% - - -
185 BASSON Bayley D. 10% 53% 31% 7% 1% -
186 BHAN Zala 10% 45% 35% 9% 1% -
187 SCHMIDT Victoria 39% 51% 10% 1% - -
188 NARANG Maya 4% 22% 37% 27% 9% 1% -
189 NAM Cassie 13% 36% 34% 14% 3% - -
190 CRARY Jacqueline Louise 6% 29% 38% 21% 6% 1% -
191 KALE Anika A. - 5% 25% 39% 25% 6% 1%
192 SCHUEPPERT Chloe M. 39% 48% 12% 1% - - -
193 RONAN Audrey 15% 36% 33% 14% 3% - -
194 NAMGALAURI Mariam - 4% 21% 37% 28% 9% 1%
195 KENNEDY Elizabeth 9% 37% 37% 15% 2% - -
196 LONG Madeline M. 1% 14% 35% 33% 14% 3% -
197 MUSTO Isabella 5% 34% 42% 16% 2% - -
198 KETTELLE Molly 16% 40% 33% 10% 1% - -
199 SLASKI Caroline O. 19% 41% 30% 9% 1% - -
199 UPTON Sydney 1% 11% 43% 35% 10% 1% -
199 OETZEL Taylor 56% 40% 4% - - - -
202 LAM Victoria M. 22% 40% 28% 9% 1% - -
202 BARRON Isabella 5% 40% 41% 12% 1% - -
204 JANNACCIO morgan 9% 40% 39% 11% 1% - -
205 TAN Eden E. 32% 51% 15% 2% - - -
205 OLEDZKA Julia 59% 35% 5% - - - -
207 TURNER Reese E. 6% 42% 37% 13% 2% - -
208 MILLER Veronica 3% 33% 40% 19% 4% - -
209 CHARALEL Jessica 11% 63% 23% 3% - - -
210 WU Sarah 40% 49% 11% 1% - - -
211 DEGENHOLTZ Annabel G. 79% 20% 2% - - - -
212 BHOGAL Sukhneet 41% 50% 9% 1% - - -
213 PARK Leah 89% 11% - - - - -
214 WILSON Anna S. 1% 20% 41% 29% 8% 1% -
215 FEINBERG Gabriela 86% 14% 1% - - -
216 ZULUETA Catherine 7% 54% 32% 7% 1% - -
216 TAI Serena 78% 21% 1% - - - -
218 WALZ Olivia 75% 23% 2% - - -
219 SILVER Anna 81% 17% 1% - - - -
220 ROHRING Anna L. 49% 41% 9% 1% - - -
220 BOWDEN Ms Hope A. 67% 30% 2% - - - -
220 ZARE Yasmin 64% 31% 5% - - - -
223 PENTSAKOV Margaret 11% 35% 37% 15% 2% -
224 ALEXANDER Amelia 40% 50% 10% - - - -
225 SARKARIA Jasminder 44% 48% 8% - - -
226 WERBACH Esther 24% 44% 25% 6% 1% - -
226 KNOPF Jenna G. 46% 39% 13% 2% - - -
226 KOROTCOVA Anastasia 45% 42% 12% 1% - - -
226 MCNALLY Teagan 19% 43% 31% 7% - - -
230 TAYLOR-CASAMAYOR Marisol 53% 38% 9% 1% - - -
231 PATTERSON Natalia 83% 16% 1% - - - -
232 MALHOTRA Simran 65% 31% 4% - - -
233 DATLA Medha 66% 31% 3% - - - -
233 ZAMELIS Madelyn 87% 13% 1% - - - -
235 YANIV Liya 81% 19% 1% - - - -
236 LAPPER Whitney P. 68% 30% 1% - - - -
236 DATLA Meha 73% 24% 2% - - - -
236 WASSERMAN Isabel 76% 22% 2% - - - -
236 DUVVURI Oorvi 31% 46% 20% 3% - - -
240 BURTON Sequoia 54% 38% 8% - - - -
241 POLYAKOVA Sabrina 4% 43% 40% 11% 1% - -
241 JACOBSEN Katerina 14% 47% 34% 5% - - -
243 WOODY Chloe 78% 20% 2% - - - -
243 MCCARROLL Evelyn 14% 40% 34% 11% 1% - -
243 FERNANDEZ Diana 39% 51% 10% 1% - - -
243 OWINGS Anna 19% 41% 30% 9% 1% - -
247 EDMONDSON Victoria 79% 20% 2% - - - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.