Boston, MA - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | ZHAO corey | - | - | 1% | 7% | 35% | 57% | |
2 | RICHARD Owen | - | - | 1% | 9% | 51% | 39% | |
3 | MACARTY Jordan T. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 36% | 11% |
3 | LONCAR Luka E. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 50% |
5 | LOYOLA TORRIENTE Padick | - | - | - | - | 6% | 33% | 61% |
6 | SHAH Maximilian A. | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 43% |
7 | CHOI Mason | - | - | 1% | 10% | 36% | 42% | 11% |
8 | PAHLAVI Kamran | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 31% | 6% |
9 | COLLYMORE Spencer T. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 42% | 25% |
10 | SKAALAND Will | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 8% | |
11 | PRIHODKO Max | - | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 39% | 12% |
12 | SANTOS Antonio K. | 3% | 27% | 45% | 23% | 2% | - | |
13 | ROLLO Emmett H. | - | 5% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 4% | |
14 | WU Jonathan | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 33% | 11% | 1% |
15 | CHATZIKALFAS Dimitris E. | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
16 | EKE Frank | - | - | 2% | 24% | 48% | 26% | |
17 | TEH Steven | - | 4% | 19% | 40% | 31% | 6% | |
18 | MAHESH Tarun | 2% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 1% | |
19 | GONG Haixiang | 1% | 9% | 33% | 41% | 15% | 2% | - |
19 | HAN Dongcheng | 1% | 9% | 25% | 33% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
21 | OSTIGUY Cameron | 1% | 8% | 26% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - |
22 | FLECKENSTEIN Benjamin T. | - | - | 3% | 16% | 38% | 35% | 7% |
23 | XIE Brandon | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
24 | JOSLIN Tyler | - | 5% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% |
25 | LANGTON Sawyer | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 42% | 26% | |
26 | ZHANG William | 1% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 16% | 3% | |
27 | KALKANIS George | 20% | 39% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
28 | MORTIMER Gavin | 4% | 20% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
29 | BEALS Alden | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 2% | - |
30 | HU Robert J. | 16% | 45% | 31% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
31 | FENG du | 14% | 39% | 34% | 11% | 1% | - | |
32 | KIM Dylan | 1% | 11% | 34% | 38% | 15% | 1% | |
33 | SONG Troy | 3% | 29% | 47% | 19% | 2% | - | |
34 | GAVIN Liam | 21% | 41% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | |
35 | CHU Wenxi | 1% | 15% | 36% | 33% | 13% | 2% | |
36 | DUSSEAU Maddax | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
37 | VALAYANNOPOULOS Nicolas | 2% | 17% | 42% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - |
38 | GRAYSON Joshua | 25% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
39 | THOMPSON Ian | 56% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
40 | SANTOS Francisco M. | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
41 | RIPA Joseph K. | 11% | 37% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
42 | ZHANG ethan | 11% | 36% | 37% | 14% | 2% | - | |
43 | MING Isaac | 9% | 30% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - | - |
44 | TANG WanLi | 49% | 41% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
45 | ROSENBLUM Addison J. | 34% | 43% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
46 | MASSE Jack | 71% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.