Deerfield, IL - Deerfield, IL, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | XIAO Enoch A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 38% |
| 2 | DESERANNO Jeidus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 50% |
| 3 | HERGAN Luca A. | 100% | 96% | 78% | 44% | 14% | 2% | |
| 3 | SONG Aiden S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 37% | |
| 5 | ZHAO Jason L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 64% | |
| 6 | XIAO Ethan J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 46% | 12% |
| 7 | LEE Joshua | 100% | 100% | 97% | 78% | 38% | 5% | |
| 8 | BRUK Peter J. | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 13% | 1% | |
| 9 | KAO Castor T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 22% |
| 10 | CHIN Julian S. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 6% | |
| 11 | SHA Yi Peng | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 18% | 1% | - |
| 12 | BING Charles | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 20% | 3% |
| 13 | LI Richard | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 32% | 6% | |
| 14 | LEE Aidan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 60% | 21% | |
| 15 | LO Conrad | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 29% | 5% | |
| 16 | CHAN Tyler | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 17 | KIM Tei D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 32% |
| 18 | OH Sean | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 16% |
| 19 | FREEDMAN Samuel E. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% |
| 20 | KEE Andrew L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 45% | 10% |
| 21 | YANG Luao | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 52% | 20% | 3% |
| 22 | KIM Derek A. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 23 | ORR Spencer | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 18% |
| 24 | FAVORITE William S. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 24% | 4% | - |
| 25 | KIM Jackson | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 5% | |
| 26 | REEVES Liam | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 20% | 1% | |
| 27 | TORRES Treston | 100% | 83% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 28 | WILLETT Luc G. | 100% | 92% | 64% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 29 | WANG Jackson | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 30 | LIU Michael H. | 100% | 97% | 73% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 31 | LOVIN Vlad | 100% | 87% | 45% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | SHEN Troy R. | 100% | 70% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
| 33 | TSAO Lukas | 100% | 98% | 79% | 39% | 9% | 1% | |
| 34 | JI Aidan Y. | 100% | 81% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 35 | FORTUNE Alexander J. | 100% | 90% | 57% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 36 | PALMA Matthew Dominic | 100% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 37 | LIU Jacob B. | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | CHEN Kyle P. | 100% | 96% | 73% | 35% | 9% | 1% | |
| 39 | SANTOS Carlos R. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 33% | 7% | 1% |
| 40 | CULLIVAN Justice | 100% | 95% | 70% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 41 | SHEN Luke R. | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 42 | POLONSKI Anthony | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 43 | DEGROOT Blake | 100% | 78% | 38% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 44 | BROSS James | 100% | 98% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 45 | KIM Ryan Y. | 100% | 66% | 21% | 3% | - | - | |
| 46 | YANG Nathan | 100% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.