Deerfield, IL - Deerfield, IL, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | LEE Joshua | V D V V V V | V V V V V | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 2 | KAO Castor T. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
| 3 | SONG Aiden S. | V V V V V V | V V V D | 5.6 | 6 | +0.4 |
| 3 | LI Richard | V V D V V V | V V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 5 | BING Charles | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.8 | 6 | +1.2 |
| 6 | POLONSKI Anthony | V V V D V V | V V D | 2.2 | 5 | +2.8 |
| 7 | OH Sean | V V D V D V | V V D | 5.1 | 4 | -1.1 |
| 8 | BRUK Peter J. | V D V V V D | V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 9 | CHIN Julian S. | V V V V V V | V D | 3.9 | 6 | +2.1 |
| 10 | KEE Andrew L. | V V V V V V | V D | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
| 11 | LIU Michael H. | V D V V V V | V D | 2.5 | 5 | +2.5 |
| 12 | YANG Luao | V D V V V V | V D | 4.1 | 5 | +0.9 |
| 13 | LIU Jacob B. | V D D V V V | V D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
| 14 | LO Conrad | D V D V V V | V D | 5.1 | 4 | -1.1 |
| 15 | FLYNN Ian | D V V V V D | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 16 | REEVES Liam | D V D D D V | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 17 | ORR Spencer | D V V V V D | D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 18 | LEE Aidan | V V V D V D | D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 19 | KIM Jackson | D V D V V V | D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 20 | CULLIVAN Justice | V V V D D D | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 21 | LIN Michael | V V D D D V | D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 22 | JI Aidan Y. | D D V V D V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 23 | TSAO Lukas | V D V D D D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 24 | KIM Harrison | V D D D V D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 25 | TORRES Treston | V D D D D V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 26 | CHEN Kyle P. | D D V V D D | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 27 | MIN Eric | D D V V D D | V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 27 | WANG Jackson | D D D D V V | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 27 | SANTOS Carlos R. | D D D V V D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 30 | KIM Ryan Y. | D V V D D D | V D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
| 31 | RAJPAL Alastair | D V D D D D | V D | 3.7 | 1 | -2.7 |
| 32 | SMITH Cooper | D V D D D D | V D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 33 | HAN Derek | D D V D D V | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 34 | GUERRA Gabriel H. | V D D D D V | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 35 | LO Preston | D V D V D D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 36 | METTAPALLI Tarun | V D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 37 | PALMA Matthew Dominic | D D D D V D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 37 | ORONOWICZ Jakub | D D D V D D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 39 | KELLY Tommy | V D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 40 | BURBERRY Alan | D D D D D D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 | |
| 41 | SPIEWACKI Joshua | D D D D D D | D | 0.3 | 0 | -0.3 |
| 42 | CHOE Jayden K. | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.