Deerfield, IL - Deerfield, IL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LEE Joshua | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
| 2 | KAO Castor T. | - | - | - | 1% | 14% | 44% | 40% |
| 3 | SONG Aiden S. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 31% | 64% |
| 3 | LI Richard | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 43% | 15% |
| 5 | BING Charles | - | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 46% | 20% |
| 6 | POLONSKI Anthony | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 7 | OH Sean | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 41% | 39% |
| 8 | BRUK Peter J. | - | 1% | 6% | 19% | 33% | 30% | 11% |
| 9 | CHIN Julian S. | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 5% |
| 10 | KEE Andrew L. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 40% | 20% |
| 11 | LIU Michael H. | 1% | 13% | 36% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 12 | YANG Luao | - | - | 3% | 19% | 42% | 31% | 5% |
| 13 | LIU Jacob B. | 5% | 20% | 32% | 27% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 14 | LO Conrad | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 36% |
| 15 | FLYNN Ian | - | 3% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
| 16 | REEVES Liam | 6% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 17 | ORR Spencer | - | - | 3% | 16% | 39% | 34% | 9% |
| 18 | LEE Aidan | - | - | 4% | 21% | 41% | 28% | 4% |
| 19 | KIM Jackson | - | - | 5% | 20% | 37% | 30% | 9% |
| 20 | CULLIVAN Justice | 1% | 10% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% |
| 21 | LIN Michael | 2% | 10% | 24% | 32% | 23% | 8% | 1% |
| 22 | JI Aidan Y. | 1% | 13% | 37% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 23 | TSAO Lukas | 1% | 13% | 35% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 24 | KIM Harrison | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 25 | TORRES Treston | 7% | 29% | 40% | 21% | 3% | - | - |
| 26 | CHEN Kyle P. | 2% | 11% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 27 | MIN Eric | - | 5% | 16% | 30% | 30% | 16% | 3% |
| 27 | WANG Jackson | 1% | 15% | 39% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 27 | SANTOS Carlos R. | 4% | 23% | 38% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 30 | KIM Ryan Y. | 37% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 31 | RAJPAL Alastair | - | 1% | 7% | 31% | 46% | 14% | 1% |
| 32 | SMITH Cooper | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 33 | HAN Derek | 10% | 34% | 37% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 34 | GUERRA Gabriel H. | 5% | 21% | 33% | 26% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 35 | LO Preston | 3% | 28% | 42% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
| 36 | METTAPALLI Tarun | 6% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 37 | PALMA Matthew Dominic | 17% | 37% | 31% | 12% | 3% | - | - |
| 37 | ORONOWICZ Jakub | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 39 | KELLY Tommy | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 40 | BURBERRY Alan | 12% | 35% | 36% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
| 41 | SPIEWACKI Joshua | 74% | 23% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 42 | CHOE Jayden K. | 14% | 48% | 32% | 6% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.