Ontario, CA - Ontario, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | NAGIMOV Marsel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 61% |
| 2 | GASSNER Ethan I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 81% |
| 3 | JEON Caleb A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 18% |
| 3 | KIM Brandon J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% |
| 5 | LI Raphael C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 21% |
| 6 | CHEN Ziyuan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 44% |
| 7 | BURKE Spencer W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 29% |
| 8 | NGUYEN Nish | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
| 9 | ZENG Lucas H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 22% |
| 10 | DIVITO Dylan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% | 28% |
| 11 | CHIN Julian S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 29% | 5% |
| 12 | OH Samuel H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 18% |
| 13 | SCHULZE-KALT Graydon L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 13% | 1% |
| 14 | TSANG Matthew K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% |
| 15 | VAZQUEZ Zander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 28% | 5% |
| 16 | GODZHIK Zachary | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 25% | 2% |
| 17 | YU Anders | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 39% | 9% |
| 18 | KO Brian J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 57% |
| 19 | TSAY Jeremy M. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 4% |
| 20 | GOOR Julian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 37% | 5% |
| 21 | CHENG Matthew S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
| 22 | LUH Ethan K. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 24% | 4% |
| 23 | DANKAR Neel | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 66% | 31% | 6% |
| 24 | CHAN Tyler | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 34% | 5% |
| 25 | LIN Dashiell | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 8% |
| 26 | SUNG Chang-Han S. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 15% | 1% |
| 27 | KIM Andrew J. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 28 | XIAO EDWARD | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 14% | 1% |
| 29 | DIERKS Kian | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 3% |
| 30 | SCHWIEBERT Michael F. | 100% | 97% | 77% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 31 | JORDON Kaleb W. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 32 | GOLDADE Luke A. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 31% | 8% | 1% |
| 33 | DARIANO Noah G. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 3% |
| 34 | JAIN Aditya | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 6% |
| 35 | LAO Scott E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 12% |
| 36 | DESAI Nalin H. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 37 | NAYGAS LAWRENCE I. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 15% | 2% |
| 38 | FIECHTNER Thomas A. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 39 | CHENG Nathan | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 40 | JOHNSTON Conner S. | 100% | 92% | 62% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 41 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 42 | O'BARR Kieran C. | 100% | 100% | 91% | 62% | 27% | 6% | 1% |
| 43 | DETERING Julian | 100% | 99% | 86% | 48% | 13% | 1% | - |
| 44 | GIRALDO Pablo E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 22% |
| 45 | MORALES Ian N. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 46 | LE Jacob W. | 100% | 95% | 71% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 46 | KIM Aaron J. | 100% | 100% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 7% | - |
| 48 | PATINO Yahir | 100% | 99% | 84% | 49% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 49 | WU Jerry Z. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 2% |
| 50 | HOSKERI Anik S. | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 51 | CANLAS Nathan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 52 | WU Conrad J. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 53 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 54 | WOO Christian | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 55 | ZHENG zhe | 100% | 96% | 62% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 56 | LI Avery Peihong | 100% | 86% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 57 | WANG Andrew | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 33% | 7% | 1% |
| 58 | KIM Ryan Y. | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 59 | PIESNER Zachary C. | 100% | 81% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 60 | CHI Alexander | 100% | 93% | 64% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 61 | MCCOSH Evin M. | 100% | 97% | 72% | 27% | 4% | - | - |
| 62 | SEAL Maximus R. | 100% | 85% | 47% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 63 | DINSAY Kristjan | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 64 | KIM Derek A. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 65 | SADOVSKY Leor B. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 66 | TAN Christien | 100% | 97% | 76% | 40% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 67 | BROWN Darius D. | 100% | 72% | 30% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 68 | GUO Hairuo | 100% | 53% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 69 | CHUANG Kian J. | 100% | 92% | 64% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 70 | ZHOU Hao Kai (Kevin) | 100% | 54% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 71 | GOING Nicholas (Nick) S. | 100% | 68% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 72 | MO Jason | 100% | 93% | 65% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 73 | LIEBERMAN Grant | 100% | 53% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 74 | RAINS Jackson T. | 100% | 22% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 75 | PARK Sky | 100% | 10% | - | - | - | - | - |
| 76 | NGUYEN William | 100% | 32% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 76 | RODRIGUEZ VINCENT | 100% | 75% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.