Evanston, IL - Evanston, IL, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ELSAYED Ahmed | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% |
| 2 | ZHU Zimo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 32% |
| 3 | SILVERS Noah E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 36% | 7% |
| 3 | JOVANOVIC Jovan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 51% | |
| 5 | TUCKER Brad W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 52% |
| 6 | SHAH S Ayush | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 30% |
| 7 | NOWAK Jakub P. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 43% | 9% | |
| 8 | IVAKIMOV Vasil | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 20% | |
| 9 | SUVOROV Yuly | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 24% | |
| 10 | GUINAN Joseph | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 32% | 5% |
| 11 | ROSTAL Scott E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 22% | |
| 12 | GORIUNOV IVAN A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 9% |
| 13 | DINKINS Ramadan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 41% | 9% |
| 14 | DITTEL Aaron K. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% | |
| 15 | OH Matthew M. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 24% | 4% | |
| 16 | LI Chenyu | 100% | 92% | 60% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 17 | GREGORY Abram | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 19% | 3% | |
| 18 | WANG David | 100% | 82% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 19 | BENACK Steven M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 27% | |
| 20 | WU Byron | 100% | 97% | 79% | 44% | 13% | 1% | |
| 21 | NGUYEN Tate | 100% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 22 | MCKEEVER Luca | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 23 | SMITH Jackson | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 35% | 7% |
| 24 | BUTTZ John-Henry | 100% | 96% | 77% | 40% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 25 | TOPAZ Nicholas | 100% | 95% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 26 | WILKINSON Derek H. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 18% | 2% | |
| 27 | TAE William G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 46% | 11% |
| 28 | BUTLER Joseph D. | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 29 | STENCEL Andrew E. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 7% | - |
| 30 | MORGAN Cooper | 100% | 80% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 31 | SATTERFIELD Donald | 100% | 98% | 78% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 32 | SWANSON Dave | 100% | 90% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 33 | OZANNE Jeffrey S. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 17% | 2% |
| 34 | PRABHAKAR Vibhav | 100% | 78% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 35 | DICKSON Tim | 100% | 70% | 27% | 5% | - | - | |
| 36 | ASGARALLY Anthony | 100% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 37 | DENNIS Ethan | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 38 | KILUK Andrew | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% | |
| 39 | MAYER Vinzenz | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 22% | 3% | |
| 40 | GLASS Timothy C. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 14% | |
| 41 | WHEELER Mark C. | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 22% | 3% | - |
| 42 | THOMAS Samuel | 100% | 99% | 87% | 54% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 43 | BISSEN Quinn | 100% | 95% | 69% | 29% | 6% | - | - |
| 44 | NIKOLOV Peter | 100% | 93% | 63% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 45 | DU Drake | 100% | 92% | 62% | 24% | 4% | - | |
| 46 | KRAJ Pawel | 100% | 90% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - | |
| 47 | TIERNEY Luke | 100% | 67% | 21% | 2% | - | - | |
| 48 | LAUER Michael | 100% | 91% | 60% | 24% | 5% | - | - |
| 49 | BIESIADA Jacek W. | 100% | 82% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 50 | HUANG Jason | 100% | 85% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 51 | MILLER Lance W. | 100% | 76% | 30% | 5% | - | - | |
| 52 | JAMISON-KOENIG Matthias (Thias) P. | 100% | 86% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.