Boston, MA - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
1 | ZAFFT Maximo S. | - | - | 1% | 13% | 43% | 43% |
2 | INSLER Ethan C. | - | - | 4% | 23% | 46% | 27% |
3 | GOHEL Dayus T. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 48% |
3 | WU Jonathan | 1% | 12% | 42% | 34% | 10% | 1% |
5 | ZHAO corey | - | - | 5% | 26% | 44% | 24% |
6 | YUROVCHAK Andrew T. | - | - | 4% | 23% | 47% | 27% |
7 | LAI Coby | - | 2% | 15% | 39% | 36% | 8% |
8 | DOLMETSCH Max | - | 2% | 13% | 37% | 37% | 11% |
9 | PRIHODKO Max | - | 5% | 26% | 41% | 24% | 4% |
10 | WU Joseph | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 36% |
11 | PAHLAVI Kamran | - | 6% | 24% | 39% | 26% | 5% |
12 | CHOI Mason | - | 2% | 31% | 44% | 19% | 3% |
13 | SKAALAND Will | - | 3% | 18% | 41% | 31% | 6% |
14 | MCCOMISKEY Aiden J. | - | 2% | 15% | 38% | 36% | 10% |
15 | GUI Runlin | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 12% |
16 | MORSE Tyler | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 21% |
17 | MACARTY Jordan T. | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 11% |
18 | EKE Frank | - | 3% | 18% | 40% | 32% | 8% |
19 | COLLYMORE Spencer T. | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 36% |
20 | PAPAVASSILIOU Christos | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 7% |
21 | KUBATIN Anton V. | 40% | 42% | 16% | 3% | < 1% | - |
22 | SHAH Maximilian A. | - | 1% | 12% | 40% | 37% | 9% |
23 | LANGTON Sawyer | - | 6% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
24 | RICHARD Owen | - | 1% | 9% | 36% | 41% | 12% |
25 | HERMANSON David B. | - | 6% | 29% | 40% | 21% | 3% |
26 | LAI Aedin | 7% | 31% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - |
27 | JIN Owen | - | - | 1% | 11% | 38% | 50% |
28 | JOSLIN Tyler | 11% | 41% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - |
29 | ROLLO Emmett H. | 9% | 36% | 38% | 14% | 2% | - |
30 | BANKIER Emilio N. | 7% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - |
31 | JANKOWICH Alexander E. | 2% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 2% |
32 | BEALS Alden | 10% | 35% | 38% | 15% | 2% | - |
33 | SIMPSON Patrick | - | 2% | 27% | 45% | 22% | 3% |
34 | SKIFFINGTON Sam | 8% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 4% | - |
35 | BURLING Trenor | 45% | 51% | 4% | - | - | - |
36 | GONG Haixiang | 9% | 35% | 39% | 15% | 2% | - |
37 | STALL-RYAN Jonathan | 3% | 18% | 37% | 31% | 10% | 1% |
38 | FENG du | 39% | 43% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
39 | XIE Brandon | 45% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
40 | WENGER Caleb | 8% | 36% | 41% | 13% | 1% | - |
41 | QI Terry | 32% | 48% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
42 | BENCZE Kristof | 49% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
43 | MATEI Daniel | 1% | 10% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 3% |
44 | STEIN Philip | 38% | 48% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
45 | LUO Peter | 41% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
46 | LIU Jeremiah | 45% | 49% | 6% | - | - | - |
47 | GALEONE Seamus | 9% | 36% | 39% | 14% | 2% | - |
48 | SHAO Haian | 47% | 41% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.