Denver, CO - Denver, CO, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | SHUGART Henry R. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.7 | 6 | +1.3 |
| 2 | BRISLAWN Reilly R. | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.3 | 6 | +1.7 |
| 3 | NIEBERGALL Colin G. | V V V V D V | V V V D | 5.3 | 5 | -0.3 |
| 3 | HE Jason | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 5 | PRASAD Ankith | V V V V V V | V V D | 4.9 | 6 | +1.1 |
| 6 | MOSES Alexander | V D V V V V | V V D | 2.6 | 5 | +2.4 |
| 7 | LEE Alexander G. | D D V V V V | V V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 8 | HUANG Zijin | D V D V V V | V V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 9 | AU Marcus J. | D V V V D V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 10 | YUMIACO Nolan C. | V V V D V D | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 11 | SMITH Jackson | V V V D D V | V D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 12 | CHOI Isaac | D V V V D D | V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 13 | LIU Kyle | V D V D V D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 14 | GARRETT Samuel | D D V D V | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 15 | SCRIBNER Aidan C. | D D D V V D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 16 | KIM Benjamin I. | V D D V D D | V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 17 | HOLDERNESS Landon | V D V V V V | D | 3.1 | 5 | +1.9 |
| 18 | TOWNSEND Avery S. | D V V D V V | D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
| 19 | SHAH S Ayush | D V D V V | D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 20 | SOLTER Kai | V V V D D D | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 21 | KOPPE Benjamin | V D V D D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 22 | KAJI Ty | V D D V D | D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 23 | GOLDMAN Rami | D D V D V D | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 24 | KIM Darius H. | V V D D D D | D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
| 25 | CHUNG Thomas | V D D D V D | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 26 | HANRATTY Liam | D V D V D D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 27 | ZHANG RUOMU | D V D D D V | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 28 | MUFIC Oliver | D V D D D | D | 0.6 | 1 | +0.4 |
| 29 | ROMERO Caleb E. | D D D D D V | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 30 | DIECK Logan O. | D V D D D D | V D | 4.7 | 1 | -3.7 |
| 30 | GRAY Joshua | D D D D D V | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 32 | FOWLER Henry | D D D D V D | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 33 | PAI Nandan K. | D D D D D D | D | 1.6 | 0 | -1.6 |
| 34 | KOH Tommy | D D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.