Deerfield, IL - Deerfield, IL, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | LEE Seungwon | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 41% | 21% |
| 2 | KOZAKIEWICZ Filip | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 32% | 11% |
| 3 | SPINA Joseph B. | 1% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
| 3 | XIAO Andrew | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 3% |
| 5 | NIKOLOV Peter | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 43% | 19% |
| 6 | NESTEROV Andrew E. | - | - | 5% | 23% | 44% | 27% |
| 7 | DAVOODIAN Christopher | - | 6% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 6% |
| 8 | TIKHOMIROV Theodore | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
| 9 | ZHENG Haoran | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 33% | 12% |
| 10 | SHCHUR Landon | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 41% | 25% |
| 11 | CARRIER Gabriel A. | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 14% |
| 12 | MCKEEVER Luca | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 41% | 24% |
| 13 | ZHU Eric | 12% | 44% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 14 | KARNAS Karol | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 20% | 4% |
| 15 | KIM Nathan | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 34% | 11% |
| 16 | WANG owen | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
| 17 | PRABHAKAR vibhav | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
| 18 | WALIGORA Sebastian | 5% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
| 19 | YAO Geoffrey B. | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 32% | 11% |
| 20 | KRZYSIAK David F. | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 21 | LOISEAU Eliott | 5% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
| 22 | SHA Michael | 1% | 13% | 41% | 33% | 10% | 1% |
| 23 | SONN Rohan | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% |
| 24 | CORRALES Victor M. | 2% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
| 25 | WALIGORA Krystian | 9% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 26 | WOLFE Alex | - | 6% | 22% | 36% | 28% | 8% |
| 27 | O'DONNELL Benjamin | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 32% | 10% |
| 28 | BRADFORD Ethan | - | 4% | 22% | 45% | 25% | 4% |
| 29 | DIVERIS Joseph | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 30 | HINGSBERGEN Perry | 14% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 31 | RICHARDSON Ray | 58% | 35% | 6% | - | - | - |
| 32 | ROBERTS Magnus | 28% | 41% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 33 | TASKIRAN Mete | 26% | 42% | 24% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 34 | MUGA Aiden | 16% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 35 | HOLLOWAY Phoenix | 15% | 40% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 36 | SIEFKER Ian | 32% | 43% | 21% | 5% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.