Deerfield, IL - Deerfield, IL, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | LEE Seungwon | D D V V V | V V V V V | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 2 | KOZAKIEWICZ Filip | V D V V D | V V V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 3 | SPINA Joseph B. | D V V V V | V V V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 3 | XIAO Andrew | D V V V V | V V V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 5 | NIKOLOV Peter | V D V D V | V V D | 3.7 | 3 | -0.7 |
| 6 | NESTEROV Andrew E. | D V V V D | V V D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 7 | DAVOODIAN Christopher | V D D V D | V V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 8 | TIKHOMIROV Theodore | V D D D D | V V V D | 2.3 | 1 | -1.3 |
| 9 | ZHENG Haoran | V V V V V | V D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
| 10 | SHCHUR Landon | V V V V D | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 11 | CARRIER Gabriel A. | D V V V V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 12 | MCKEEVER Luca | D V V D V | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 13 | ZHU Eric | D V D V V | V D | 1.4 | 3 | +1.6 |
| 14 | KARNAS Karol | D V V V D | V D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 15 | KIM Nathan | V V D V D | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 16 | WANG owen | D V D V D | V D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
| 17 | PRABHAKAR vibhav | V V V V V | D | 2.8 | 5 | +2.2 |
| 18 | WALIGORA Sebastian | V V V D V | D | 2.1 | 4 | +1.9 |
| 19 | YAO Geoffrey B. | D V D V V | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 20 | KRZYSIAK David F. | V D V D V | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 21 | LOISEAU Eliott | V V V D D | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 22 | SHA Michael | V V V D D | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 23 | SONN Rohan | V D D V V | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 24 | CORRALES Victor M. | V D V V D | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 25 | WALIGORA Krystian | V D D D V | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 26 | WOLFE Alex | D V D D V | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 27 | O'DONNELL Benjamin | V D D D V | D | 3.2 | 2 | -1.2 |
| 28 | BRADFORD Ethan | V D D V D | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 29 | DIVERIS Joseph | D D V D V | D | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 |
| 30 | HINGSBERGEN Perry | D V D D D | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 31 | RICHARDSON Ray | D D D D V | V D | 0.5 | 1 | +0.5 |
| 32 | ROBERTS Magnus | D D D D D | V D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 33 | TASKIRAN Mete | V D D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 34 | MUGA Aiden | D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 35 | HOLLOWAY Phoenix | D D D D D | D | 1.4 | 0 | -1.4 |
| 36 | SIEFKER Ian | D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.