Suffern, NY - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SZAPARY Tristan B. | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 23% |
| 2 | MILLER Finn S. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 9% |
| 3 | DELANEY Alexander D. | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 7% |
| 3 | YU Colin | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 7% |
| 5 | MERCHANT Reza H. | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 9% |
| 6 | ZHANG Joshua | 2% | 12% | 27% | 31% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 7 | DANZIG Jacob S. | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 18% | |
| 8 | KUMAR Anitya | 12% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 9 | SHENG Patrick Y. | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | |
| 10 | ZUCKER Noah L. | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 13% | |
| 11 | INSLER Gabriel C. | 3% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | |
| 12 | DOLGONOS Mark | 3% | 19% | 38% | 30% | 10% | 1% | |
| 13 | BASOK Daniel | 2% | 12% | 27% | 32% | 20% | 6% | 1% |
| 14 | LAVENSTEIN Kinley V. | 1% | 6% | 20% | 31% | 27% | 12% | 2% |
| 15 | ZHANG Matthew | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 16 | CHA Russell W. | - | 1% | 4% | 16% | 31% | 33% | 15% |
| 17 | MARAKOV Allen B. | - | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 19% |
| 18 | WOLOSINSKI Peter | - | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | - |
| 19 | GHAZALEH Thomas Xavier | - | - | - | 5% | 22% | 43% | 29% |
| 20 | LEIGH David A. | - | - | 5% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 6% |
| 21 | INSLER Ethan C. | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 22 | DIDASKALOU Ilias L. | 10% | 32% | 36% | 18% | 4% | - | |
| 23 | KRONROD Tal | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 21% | 4% | |
| 24 | TABLEMAN Doug S. | - | - | 4% | 18% | 42% | 36% | |
| 25 | HAO Jerry | 1% | 6% | 24% | 37% | 26% | 6% | |
| 26 | SHINE Peter C. | - | 8% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 27 | RA Jr. Daniel M. | - | - | 6% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 7% |
| 28 | KOKENGE Clark | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 6% | |
| 29 | GIBSON Nowell L. | 2% | 12% | 29% | 35% | 19% | 4% | |
| 30 | KIM William M. | 16% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 31 | ELAMURUGAN Kavin | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | |
| 32 | KANG Michael H. | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 9% | |
| 33 | CHILANA Savitoz (Savi) | 14% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | |
| 34 | OLIVERIUS Joseph W. | 1% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 3% | |
| 35 | SLAVINSKIY Alan | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 42% | 23% |
| 36 | BORATIN Daniel I. | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 37 | SPANO Gideon S. | 13% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
| 38 | HANXU Richard A. | - | 2% | 12% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
| 39 | LUKANYUK Lorence | 1% | 7% | 21% | 32% | 27% | 11% | 2% |
| 40 | BHATNAGAR Nishay V. | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
| 42 | SOOMRO Adam A. | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 43 | SIDDIQUI Humza K. | 6% | 36% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 44 | SMITH Nicholas S. | 6% | 21% | 33% | 26% | 11% | 3% | - |
| 45 | ZHANG William | 53% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 46 | RODE Damian E. | 3% | 27% | 41% | 23% | 6% | - | |
| 47 | MRAK Michael R. | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 48 | RITCHIE Mark T. | 6% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 49 | MORSE Tyler | 11% | 31% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% | |
| 50 | RHYU Kozmo | 4% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 51 | RITCHIE Patrick Q. | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 51 | LEE Tae Hee | 70% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 53 | KWONG Jason | 10% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.