Suffern, NY - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | SZAPARY Tristan B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 23% |
| 2 | MILLER Finn S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 9% |
| 3 | DELANEY Alexander D. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 33% | 7% |
| 3 | YU Colin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 34% | 7% |
| 5 | MERCHANT Reza H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 39% | 9% |
| 6 | ZHANG Joshua | 100% | 98% | 85% | 58% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 7 | DANZIG Jacob S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 18% | |
| 8 | KUMAR Anitya | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 9 | SHENG Patrick Y. | 100% | 93% | 68% | 33% | 9% | 1% | |
| 10 | ZUCKER Noah L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 51% | 13% | |
| 11 | INSLER Gabriel C. | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 3% | |
| 12 | DOLGONOS Mark | 100% | 97% | 78% | 40% | 11% | 1% | |
| 13 | BASOK Daniel | 100% | 98% | 86% | 59% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 14 | LAVENSTEIN Kinley V. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 42% | 15% | 2% |
| 15 | ZHANG Matthew | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
| 16 | CHA Russell W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 48% | 15% |
| 17 | MARAKOV Allen B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 19% |
| 18 | WOLOSINSKI Peter | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 29% | 6% | - |
| 19 | GHAZALEH Thomas Xavier | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 29% |
| 20 | LEIGH David A. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 34% | 6% |
| 21 | INSLER Ethan C. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 4% | - |
| 22 | DIDASKALOU Ilias L. | 100% | 90% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 23 | KRONROD Tal | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 25% | 4% | |
| 24 | TABLEMAN Doug S. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 36% | |
| 25 | HAO Jerry | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 32% | 6% | |
| 26 | SHINE Peter C. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - |
| 27 | RA Jr. Daniel M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 7% |
| 28 | KOKENGE Clark | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 31% | 6% | |
| 29 | GIBSON Nowell L. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 4% | |
| 30 | KIM William M. | 100% | 84% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 31 | ELAMURUGAN Kavin | 100% | 96% | 74% | 36% | 9% | 1% | |
| 32 | KANG Michael H. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 36% | 9% | |
| 33 | CHILANA Savitoz (Savi) | 100% | 86% | 50% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 34 | OLIVERIUS Joseph W. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 3% | |
| 35 | SLAVINSKIY Alan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 23% |
| 36 | BORATIN Daniel I. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 37 | SPANO Gideon S. | 100% | 87% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 38 | HANXU Richard A. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 4% |
| 39 | LUKANYUK Lorence | 100% | 99% | 92% | 72% | 40% | 13% | 2% |
| 40 | BHATNAGAR Nishay V. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 83% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
| 42 | SOOMRO Adam A. | 100% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 43 | SIDDIQUI Humza K. | 100% | 94% | 59% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 44 | SMITH Nicholas S. | 100% | 94% | 73% | 40% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 45 | ZHANG William | 100% | 47% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 46 | RODE Damian E. | 100% | 97% | 70% | 29% | 6% | - | |
| 47 | MRAK Michael R. | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 48 | RITCHIE Mark T. | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 49 | MORSE Tyler | 100% | 89% | 58% | 24% | 6% | 1% | |
| 50 | RHYU Kozmo | 100% | 96% | 78% | 47% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 51 | RITCHIE Patrick Q. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 51 | LEE Tae Hee | 100% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
| 53 | KWONG Jason | 100% | 90% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.