April NAC

Div I Men's Foil

Saturday, April 17, 2021 at 8:15 AM

Fort Worth, TX - Fort Worth, TX, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 EMMER Chase T. V V V V V V V V V V V V 4.9 6 +1.1
2 KUMBLA Sidarth V V V V D V V V V V V D 5.6 5 -0.6
3 PARK Luke J. V D V D V V V V V V V D 3.4 4 +0.6
3 GASSNER Ethan I. V V V V D V V V V V D 5.0 5 -
5 LOUIE Bryce V V V V V V V V V D 5.4 6 +0.6
6 LI Brandon H. V V V V V V V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
7 KASI Sanjay V V V V V V V V V D 3.1 6 +2.9
8 BAS Liam V D V D V V V V V D 2.2 3 +0.8
9 OLIVARES Marcello G. V V V V V V V V D 5.2 6 +0.8
10 HOSSFELD Finn E. V V V V V V V D 3.8 5 +1.2
11 KIM Nicholas W. V V V V V D V V D 3.6 5 +1.4
12 YU Vinni V V V D V V V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
13 SNYTSHEUVEL John Evan (Evan) V V V V D V V V D 4.5 5 +0.5
14 TSANG Matthew K. V V V D V V V D 1.8 4 +2.2
15 ZHANG Daniel D. D V V V D D V V V D 4.3 3 -1.3
16 BINDER Zachary (Zach) B. V D V D D V V V D 3.8 2 -1.8
17 LIAO Jun Heng (James) V V V V V V D 4.5 5 +0.5
18 KO Brian J. V V V V V V V D 3.8 6 +2.2
19 GRIFFIN John O. V D V V V V V D 4.4 5 +0.6
20 NDIAYE Edriss G. V D V V V V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
21 KELLY William J. V V V V D V D 2.5 4 +1.5
22 XIAO Ethan J. V D V D V V V D 4.2 4 -0.2
23 DORITY Philip S. V V V D V D V D 4.2 4 -0.2
24 ZHAO Jason L. V D V V D V V D 2.1 4 +1.9
25 XIAO Enoch A. V D V V D V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
26 GROSSMAN SMISEK Spencer E. D D V V V V V D 3.0 4 +1.0
27 CHUNG Andrew N. D V V D V V V D 5.4 4 -1.4
28 LEVY Jacob M. D D V V V V V V D 3.2 4 +0.8
29 WANG Brian S. D D V V V V V D 3.4 3 -0.4
30 DEBACK Maximus (Max) X. V V V D D V V D 4.0 3 -1.0
31 BOURTIS James S. V D V V D V V D 4.2 3 -1.2
32 GRIFFITH JACK D V V D V V V D 2.1 3 +0.9
33 CHEN James P. V V V V V V D 5.2 6 +0.8
34 MATHIEU Adam V V V V V V D 5.7 6 +0.3
35 KAISER Hans Z. V V D V V V D 3.5 5 +1.5
36 LO Conrad V V D V V V D 3.0 5 +2.0
37 WELCH Kyle J. V D V V V V D 3.9 5 +1.1
38 HUANG Bin D V V V V V D 4.8 5 +0.2
39 AUGUSTINE Ethan A. V V D V V D 3.0 4 +1.0
40 FOGELSON Frederick J. V D V V V D 2.1 4 +1.9
41 ZENG Lucas H. V D V V D V D 3.2 4 +0.8
42 DUDEY Michael V V V V D D D 4.6 4 -0.6
43 KATAYAMA Kevin D V V V V D D 4.2 4 -0.2
43 YU Eric W. D V V D V V D 4.6 4 -0.6
45 CHIN Jason Y. V D V V D V D 3.2 4 +0.8
46 CHEN Earnest P. V V V D D V V D 4.4 4 -0.4
47 KAO Castor T. V V D D V V D 2.2 3 +0.8
48 PARKINS Benjamin B. D D V V V V D 3.8 3 -0.8
49 SCHEMBRI MCCORD Kruz T. V D V V D V D 2.4 3 +0.6
50 IVERSON Shane D. V V D V D D V D 4.8 3 -1.8
51 KIM Brandon J. D D V D V V V D 2.2 3 +0.8
52 OH Jonathan D D V V D V V D 1.8 3 +1.2
53 GRANT Lachlan K. D V D V D V V D 2.5 3 +0.5
54 JOSEPH Dominic (Dom) V V D D V D V D 2.6 3 +0.4
55 BAUMSTEIN Nicholas I. V V V D D D V D 3.1 3 -0.1
56 UM Ethan A. V D V D V D V D 3.1 3 -0.1
57 MARTINEZ Donavyn E. D V V V D D V D 3.9 3 -0.9
58 LIU Niles J. V D D V D V D 4.0 2 -2.0
59 CHEN Allen D V D D V V D 2.2 2 -0.2
60 HODGES Carter F. D D V V D D V D 4.3 2 -2.3
61 GRAHAM Roy J. V D D V D D V D 1.9 2 +0.1
62 HU Oliver W. V D D D V D V D 3.1 2 -1.1
63 LONG Quinton R. V D D D D V V D 1.8 2 +0.2
64 XIAO EDWARD V D D D D V V D 1.1 2 +0.9
65 CHENG Jonathan V V V D V D D 2.4 4 +1.6
66 WU Alexander V V D D V V D 2.0 4 +2.0
67 JANG Jaewon D V D V V D 2.2 3 +0.8
68 ACUNA Gabriel G. V D V V D D 2.5 3 +0.5
69 CHEN Andrew V V V D D D 1.9 3 +1.1
70 FUKUDA Alessio R. D V D V V D 1.6 3 +1.4
71 OUELLETTE David M. D V V D V D 2.2 3 +0.8
72 KUMBLA Samarth D V D V V D 2.2 3 +0.8
73 OURSLER Jack D D V V V D D 4.1 3 -1.1
73 DESERANNO Jeidus V D V V D D D 4.3 3 -1.3
75 ZOBEL Eric H. D V V V D D D 3.2 3 -0.2
76 GIRALDO Pablo E. V V D D V D D 3.1 3 -0.1
77 DOBBINS Evan W. D D V V V D D 2.7 3 +0.3
78 LIANG Lixi (Henry) V D D D V V D 3.0 3 -
79 SONG Leonardo T. D V D D V V D 1.5 3 +1.5
80 LIU Justin D V D D V D 4.1 2 -2.1
81 ZHENG Alan H. D D D V V D 1.9 2 +0.1
82 ZHANG Andy W. D V D V D D 2.5 2 -0.5
83 KIM Isaiah G. D V D V D D 1.4 2 +0.6
84 BANERJEE ANUP D D D D V V D 2.8 2 -0.8
85 CAI Jason Zhicheng V D D D D V D 1.1 2 +0.9
86 DICKSON Farr R. V D D D D V D 4.2 2 -2.2
87 FUKUDA Renzo K. V D V D D D D 2.5 2 -0.5
88 DAI Jonathan T. V V D D D D D 2.2 2 -0.2
89 LEWIS Paul D. D D D D V V D 2.2 2 -0.2
90 LEE Jacob J D V D D V D D 1.1 2 +0.9
91 FLANAGAN James D V V D D D D 2.4 2 -0.4
91 LEE Aidan D D V D V D D 1.9 2 +0.1
93 LEE Chris D V D D V D 1.6 2 +0.4
94 HO Ryan J. D V D D V D 2.5 2 -0.5
95 HONG Daniel V D D D D 2.0 1 -1.0
96 MCCLAIN Bryce C. D D V D D 2.3 1 -1.3
96 KWON Ethan V D D D D 1.5 1 -0.5
98 JAUME Andrei D D D D V D 1.6 1 -0.6
99 SONG Aiden S. D V D D D D 2.4 1 -1.4
100 WHITEHEAD Amir D D D V D D 0.4 1 +0.6
101 KEE Andrew L. D D D V D D 1.1 1 -0.1
102 BING Charles D D D D D V 1.8 1 -0.8
103 REALS Alden D. D D D V D D 2.8 1 -1.8
104 LIN Dashiell V D D D D D 2.0 1 -1.0
105 DIERKS Kian D V D D D D 1.1 1 -0.1
106 KIM Aaron J. D D D D V D 1.2 1 -0.2
107 CHIN Julian S. D D D D V D 1.6 1 -0.6
108 JEON Caleb A. V D D D D D 2.8 1 -1.8
109 HOOSHI Dylan M. D D D D D 2.5 0 -2.5
110 BAE Kevin D D D D D D 1.8 0 -1.8
111 POPOKH Leo D D D D D 0.7 0 -0.7
111 HAN Andersen Y. D D D D D 1.0 0 -1.0
113 ZHANG Luke T. D D D D D D 1.3 0 -1.3
114 SICHITIU Alexander D D D D D 0.9 0 -0.9
115 NEWELL Ian A. D D D D D 0.6 0 -0.6
116 SONG Dylan S. D D D D D D 1.2 0 -1.2
117 GORBACHEV Alexander D D D D D D 1.0 0 -1.0
118 LI Ryan Z. D D D D D D 0.5 0 -0.5
119 FEDONCHIK Henry J. D D D D D D 1.1 0 -1.1
119 HSIUNG Richie D D D D D D 1.1 0 -1.1

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.