April NAC

Div I Men's Foil

Saturday, April 17, 2021 at 8:15 AM

Fort Worth, TX - Fort Worth, TX, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 EMMER Chase T. - - 1% 6% 22% 42% 30%
2 KUMBLA Sidarth - - - - 4% 28% 68%
3 PARK Luke J. - 4% 17% 33% 31% 13% 2%
3 GASSNER Ethan I. - - 1% 5% 20% 42% 33%
5 LOUIE Bryce - - - 1% 10% 38% 51%
6 LI Brandon H. - - 2% 15% 47% 37%
7 KASI Sanjay 1% 7% 22% 34% 26% 9% 1%
8 BAS Liam 3% 19% 42% 30% 6% -
9 OLIVARES Marcello G. - - - 2% 13% 42% 43%
10 HOSSFELD Finn E. - 1% 6% 27% 46% 20%
11 KIM Nicholas W. - 2% 12% 32% 37% 16% 2%
12 YU Vinni - 1% 5% 19% 36% 30% 9%
13 SNYTSHEUVEL John Evan (Evan) - - 2% 12% 31% 37% 17%
14 TSANG Matthew K. 11% 31% 35% 18% 5% -
15 ZHANG Daniel D. - - 4% 17% 35% 32% 11%
16 BINDER Zachary (Zach) B. - 1% 7% 28% 43% 21%
17 LIAO Jun Heng (James) - - 1% 6% 34% 59%
18 KO Brian J. - 1% 10% 28% 36% 21% 4%
19 GRIFFIN John O. - - 1% 11% 37% 43% 7%
20 NDIAYE Edriss G. - 1% 5% 19% 36% 31% 9%
21 KELLY William J. 1% 12% 34% 37% 14% 1%
22 XIAO Ethan J. - - 4% 17% 36% 33% 9%
23 DORITY Philip S. - - 3% 17% 40% 34% 6%
24 ZHAO Jason L. 5% 23% 37% 25% 8% 1% -
25 XIAO Enoch A. - 1% 8% 27% 38% 22% 4%
26 GROSSMAN SMISEK Spencer E. 1% 8% 25% 36% 24% 6% 1%
27 CHUNG Andrew N. - - - 1% 9% 35% 55%
28 LEVY Jacob M. - 4% 19% 37% 30% 9% 1%
29 WANG Brian S. - 2% 14% 38% 38% 8%
30 DEBACK Maximus (Max) X. - 1% 5% 19% 41% 34%
31 BOURTIS James S. - - 2% 13% 44% 41%
32 GRIFFITH JACK 6% 24% 36% 25% 8% 1%
33 CHEN James P. - - - 3% 16% 42% 39%
34 MATHIEU Adam - - - - 2% 24% 74%
35 KAISER Hans Z. - 2% 14% 32% 33% 16% 3%
36 LO Conrad 1% 7% 25% 38% 23% 6% 1%
37 WELCH Kyle J. - 1% 6% 24% 42% 24% 3%
38 HUANG Bin - - 1% 7% 27% 43% 22%
39 AUGUSTINE Ethan A. 1% 6% 24% 39% 25% 5%
40 FOGELSON Frederick J. 6% 24% 36% 25% 8% 1%
41 ZENG Lucas H. - 3% 18% 39% 32% 8% -
42 DUDEY Michael - - 1% 9% 30% 44% 16%
43 KATAYAMA Kevin - - 4% 18% 37% 32% 8%
43 YU Eric W. - - 2% 10% 30% 40% 18%
45 CHIN Jason Y. 1% 6% 20% 33% 28% 11% 1%
46 CHEN Earnest P. - - 3% 15% 33% 35% 14%
47 KAO Castor T. 5% 21% 35% 28% 10% 1%
48 PARKINS Benjamin B. - 1% 7% 27% 43% 22%
49 SCHEMBRI MCCORD Kruz T. 1% 14% 38% 37% 9% 1%
50 IVERSON Shane D. - - 1% 7% 26% 43% 23%
51 KIM Brandon J. 3% 20% 38% 29% 9% 1% -
52 OH Jonathan 10% 30% 34% 19% 6% 1% -
53 GRANT Lachlan K. 2% 13% 34% 35% 14% 2% -
54 JOSEPH Dominic (Dom) 1% 12% 33% 35% 16% 3% -
55 BAUMSTEIN Nicholas I. 1% 6% 22% 35% 27% 9% 1%
56 UM Ethan A. 1% 6% 21% 35% 27% 9% 1%
57 MARTINEZ Donavyn E. - 1% 7% 26% 40% 23% 4%
58 LIU Niles J. - 1% 5% 21% 41% 31%
59 CHEN Allen 3% 20% 39% 30% 8% -
60 HODGES Carter F. - - 4% 16% 35% 33% 11%
61 GRAHAM Roy J. 8% 28% 36% 21% 6% 1% -
62 HU Oliver W. 1% 7% 22% 34% 26% 9% 1%
63 LONG Quinton R. 9% 32% 37% 18% 4% - -
64 XIAO EDWARD 26% 44% 24% 5% - - -
65 CHENG Jonathan 3% 17% 35% 31% 12% 2% -
66 WU Alexander 6% 25% 37% 24% 7% 1% -
67 JANG Jaewon 3% 20% 40% 30% 7% 1%
68 ACUNA Gabriel G. 3% 15% 33% 33% 14% 2%
69 CHEN Andrew 7% 28% 39% 21% 5% -
70 FUKUDA Alessio R. 12% 37% 36% 14% 2% -
71 OUELLETTE David M. 3% 21% 40% 28% 7% 1%
72 KUMBLA Samarth 5% 21% 35% 27% 10% 1%
73 OURSLER Jack - 1% 6% 21% 36% 28% 8%
73 DESERANNO Jeidus - - 3% 16% 35% 34% 11%
75 ZOBEL Eric H. 1% 6% 21% 35% 27% 10% 1%
76 GIRALDO Pablo E. - 4% 21% 39% 29% 7% -
77 DOBBINS Evan W. 2% 13% 30% 33% 17% 4% -
78 LIANG Lixi (Henry) 1% 6% 25% 38% 24% 6% 1%
79 SONG Leonardo T. 15% 37% 32% 13% 3% - -
80 LIU Justin - - 2% 16% 49% 32%
81 ZHENG Alan H. 8% 27% 36% 22% 6% 1%
82 ZHANG Andy W. 3% 15% 33% 32% 15% 2%
83 KIM Isaiah G. 15% 44% 33% 8% 1% -
84 BANERJEE ANUP 1% 10% 30% 35% 19% 5% -
85 CAI Jason Zhicheng 29% 42% 23% 6% 1% - -
86 DICKSON Farr R. - - 4% 18% 38% 33% 7%
87 FUKUDA Renzo K. 2% 14% 36% 33% 13% 2% -
88 DAI Jonathan T. 4% 21% 35% 27% 10% 2% -
89 LEWIS Paul D. 5% 22% 36% 27% 10% 2% -
90 LEE Jacob J 26% 45% 23% 5% - - -
91 FLANAGAN James 2% 16% 38% 33% 11% 1% -
91 LEE Aidan 7% 28% 39% 21% 5% - -
93 LEE Chris 13% 34% 34% 16% 4% - -
94 HO Ryan J. 2% 14% 33% 33% 15% 3% -
95 HONG Daniel 4% 26% 41% 23% 5% -
96 MCCLAIN Bryce C. 4% 19% 35% 29% 11% 1%
96 KWON Ethan 14% 40% 33% 11% 1% -
98 JAUME Andrei 10% 40% 36% 12% 2% - -
99 SONG Aiden S. 4% 18% 33% 30% 13% 3% -
100 WHITEHEAD Amir 65% 30% 5% - - - -
101 KEE Andrew L. 28% 45% 22% 5% - - -
102 BING Charles 10% 32% 36% 18% 4% - -
103 REALS Alden D. 2% 11% 29% 34% 19% 5% -
104 LIN Dashiell 8% 26% 35% 23% 7% 1% -
105 DIERKS Kian 28% 41% 24% 7% 1% - -
106 KIM Aaron J. 25% 41% 26% 7% 1% - -
107 CHIN Julian S. 12% 34% 34% 16% 3% - -
108 JEON Caleb A. 1% 9% 28% 36% 21% 5% -
109 HOOSHI Dylan M. 3% 14% 32% 33% 16% 3%
110 BAE Kevin 6% 35% 38% 17% 4% - -
111 POPOKH Leo 43% 42% 13% 2% - -
111 HAN Andersen Y. 30% 43% 21% 4% - -
113 ZHANG Luke T. 20% 40% 28% 9% 2% - -
114 SICHITIU Alexander 34% 44% 18% 3% - -
115 NEWELL Ian A. 52% 37% 10% 1% - -
116 SONG Dylan S. 21% 43% 27% 7% 1% - -
117 GORBACHEV Alexander 29% 46% 21% 4% - - -
118 LI Ryan Z. 56% 36% 7% 1% - - -
119 FEDONCHIK Henry J. 29% 43% 23% 5% - - -
119 HSIUNG Richie 25% 45% 24% 6% 1% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.