Fort Worth, TX - Fort Worth, TX, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | DESERANNO Jeidus | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% |
2 | YANG Luao | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 58% |
3 | HOOSHI Jayden C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% |
3 | CHEN Kyle P. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 30% | 6% |
5 | LIN Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 40% | 9% |
6 | QIAN Jason H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 50% | 12% |
7 | TANG Owen S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 20% | |
8 | DESHMUKH Arjun | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 32% |
9 | KANG Anthony | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 67% | 23% |
10 | HAN Derek | 100% | 98% | 75% | 31% | 6% | < 1% | |
11 | LI Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 29% |
12 | SIU Aiden | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 15% |
13 | FUKUDA Diego | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 13% | 1% |
14 | GUERRA Gabriel H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 22% | |
15 | LIN James G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 15% | |
16 | SUAREZ Adrian | 100% | 91% | 61% | 24% | 5% | - | |
17 | ZHEN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 73% | 31% |
18 | LO Preston | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 52% | 17% | 2% |
19 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 11% |
20 | SISINNI Riccardo | 100% | 97% | 75% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - |
21 | KIAYIAS Aris | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 17% | 2% | - |
22 | YAO Bradley | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 16% | - |
23 | CANLAS Nathan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 21% | |
24 | ZHANG Jiening G. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 20% | |
25 | LI Aaron | 100% | 99% | 88% | 59% | 22% | 3% | |
26 | SHEVCHENKO Kostiantyn | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 22% | 3% |
27 | MAO Lucas | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 35% | 8% | - |
28 | XU Andy P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 17% |
29 | WONG Garrick G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 29% | |
30 | ZHANG Aaron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 12% |
31 | AGRAWAL Niki | 100% | 91% | 61% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
32 | SENIC Lucas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 29% | 2% |
33 | CORTRIGHT Skipper (Matthew) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 40% | 8% |
34 | CHENG Ethan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 14% | - |
35 | TAN Aidan | 100% | 87% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | |
36 | KUNTSEVICH Ivan I. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 3% | |
37 | CHOI Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 61% | 20% |
38 | SIMONOV Timofey | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 29% | 6% | - |
39 | DINSAY Kristjan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
40 | KOE Beckett | 100% | 82% | 44% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
40 | GERRISH William | 100% | 87% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
42 | GULCHIN Mark | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 27% | 5% |
43 | GRIFFITH MCALLISTER thomas | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - |
44 | LIU Derek | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 41% | 8% | |
45 | WU Lucas | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 21% | 4% | - |
46 | TANG Terry | 100% | 99% | 91% | 57% | 20% | 3% | - |
47 | SZIRAKI Jordan | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 7% | 1% | - |
48 | TSAY Jordan R. | 100% | 94% | 67% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - |
49 | FEDELI Francesco | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 1% |
50 | MANIKTALA Suvir | 100% | 91% | 61% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
51 | CHANG Eric Jonathan | 100% | 89% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
52 | WONG Jacob W. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 59% | 24% | 5% | - |
53 | EDWARDS Maxon | 100% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
54 | PALMA Nathan Anthony | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 6% | - |
55 | LIU ERIC | 100% | 93% | 69% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - |
56 | RAJ Jay | 100% | 84% | 46% | 14% | 2% | - | |
57 | CHOI Benjamin | 100% | 87% | 51% | 17% | 3% | - | |
58 | KIM Aiden | 100% | 98% | 66% | 23% | 4% | - | |
59 | PARK Ryan | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
60 | FOGELSON Hugh | 100% | 90% | 59% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
61 | SHENG Dalton | 100% | 85% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | |
62 | NGUYEN martin | 100% | 85% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
63 | CHEN Junxuan | 100% | 88% | 55% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
64 | YEVDAYEV Tamir | 100% | 92% | 63% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
65 | SHIM Peter S. | 100% | 92% | 62% | 25% | 5% | - | |
66 | BONILLA Andres | 100% | 87% | 46% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
67 | CHO Xzander | 100% | 78% | 27% | 4% | - | - | - |
68 | ADAN Jacobo | 100% | 92% | 63% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
69 | ZAHRAN Aiden | 100% | 80% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
70 | SUAREZ David | 100% | 85% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
71 | CHUNG Ian | 100% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - | |
72 | HOM Logan | 100% | 52% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
73 | LE Jacob | 100% | 87% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
74 | PARK Roy | 100% | 48% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.