San Jose, CA - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | COOPER Rowan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 53% |
| 2 | GARRETT Samuel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% | |
| 3 | LUCERO-OLSON Aydin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 72% | 28% |
| 3 | JAIN Sarthak | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 28% |
| 5 | YAO Geoffrey B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 15% |
| 6 | PARK Elliot | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 11% |
| 7 | BHARGAV Siddharth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 35% | 6% |
| 8 | AHMED Saheer | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 54% | 17% |
| 9 | DOWDELL Riley | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 21% | 4% | < 1% |
| 10 | GUPTA Karan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 33% | 7% |
| 11 | CHIRASHNYA Daniel | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 21% | 3% | |
| 12 | LEE Bryson | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 30% | 4% |
| 13 | ZHUANG William | 100% | 99% | 92% | 61% | 23% | 4% | - |
| 14 | LEVITSKY Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 63% | 29% | 6% |
| 15 | WILLIS Alan | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 16 | WEAVER Neil | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 20% |
| 17 | HE Zhiheng | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 18 | KNUDSEN Travis | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 19 | ZHANG William | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 19% | 3% |
| 20 | LOWE-THORPE Tyler | 100% | 100% | 93% | 70% | 36% | 11% | 1% |
| 21 | WONG Nathan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 5% |
| 22 | BAGCHI Aritra | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 46% | 14% | 2% |
| 23 | ULINICH Alexander | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 24 | WATT Darren | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 25 | KHANNA Keshav | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 47% | 16% | 2% |
| 26 | ZHANG Andrew | 100% | 92% | 59% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 27 | PRAKASH Hari | 100% | 89% | 58% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 28 | GREEN Jabreel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 51% | 14% |
| 29 | WONG Kevin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 6% |
| 30 | ANDINO FRYDMAN Eli | 100% | 91% | 63% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 31 | RAJ Shrey | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 32 | LAI Aaron | 100% | 53% | 14% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 33 | KUO Elvin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 50% | 19% | 3% |
| 34 | LIN Kimball | 100% | 95% | 75% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 35 | CHUANG Kenneth H. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 17% | 2% | |
| 36 | ALVAREZ Ian T. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 34% | 8% |
| 37 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | 100% | 96% | 74% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 38 | MAYCHROWITZ Matt | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 19% |
| 39 | SINHA Zaan | 100% | 98% | 83% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 40 | ZHANG Nathan | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 41 | ANDERSON Kai | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 42 | ARUN Madhav | 100% | 68% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
| 43 | YUEN Nathan | 100% | 93% | 68% | 34% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 44 | NG Biwon | 100% | 50% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 44 | LIU Noah | 100% | 83% | 44% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 46 | WANG Xu-Chen | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 33% | 5% | |
| 47 | BHARGAV Angad | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 48 | ZWICKER Jacob | 100% | 87% | 53% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 49 | GU Aidan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 31% | 6% | - |
| 50 | QUIROGA Kyle | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 51 | YU Austin | 100% | 86% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 52 | JOSEPH Jeremy | 100% | 83% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 53 | KUO Rylan | 100% | 91% | 63% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 54 | ARMITAGE Liam | 100% | 94% | 66% | 27% | 5% | - | - |
| 55 | RICHARDS Andrew | 100% | 68% | 22% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.