Former Cost Plus World Market Building - Davis, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | MADISON Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 49% | |
2 | MEINHOLD Li | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 20% |
3 | KIM Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 21% |
3 | JAIN Sarthak | 100% | 98% | 83% | 48% | 12% | ||
5 | HE Zhiheng | 100% | 99% | 87% | 47% | 9% | ||
6 | ROOD Alex | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 11% |
7 | ARIETA Ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% | |
8 | GARRETT Samuel | 100% | 99% | 85% | 45% | 6% | ||
9 | GREEN Ummi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 47% | 11% |
10 | ZACHES Torrey | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 23% | |
11 | YAO Geoffrey | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% | 11% | 1% |
12 | CHIRASHNYA Adam | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 19% | 2% | |
15 | BOTHELIO Jere | 100% | 92% | 54% | 14% | 1% | ||
16 | YAMASAKI Kyle | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 61% |
17 | MILLER Kevin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 72% | |||
18 | WELDON Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 73% | 28% | 3% | |
19 | MAYCHROWITZ Matthew | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 12% | |
20 | CELECKI Barrett | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 68% | ||
21 | LOGUE Ethan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 12% | |
21 | HARGROVE Charles | 100% | 100% | 94% | 69% | 28% | 3% | |
23 | CLARKSON Cole | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
24 | ZAYDMAN David | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 31% | 4% | |
25 | HEPLER Sarah | 100% | 91% | 59% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
26 | PERKA Mike | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 15% | |
27 | KAUFMAN Joel | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 25% | 2% | |
28 | MING Nathan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 59% | 15% | 1% | - |
29 | CAI Brian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 39% | |
30 | BARNETT Devin | 100% | 67% | 16% | - | |||
31 | BECK Brian | 100% | 100% | 92% | 62% | 20% | 2% | |
32 | WATT Darren | 100% | 85% | 42% | 10% | 1% | - | |
33 | ZUHARS Renee | 100% | 99% | 83% | 45% | 13% | 2% | |
34 | HENDRICK Heidi | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 25% | 3% |
35 | WANG Owen | 100% | 100% | 96% | 65% | 19% | 2% | - |
36 | OLIVER GUIMERA Arturo | 100% | 99% | 89% | 55% | 17% | 2% | |
37 | ANGADALA Leela Krishna | 100% | 93% | 61% | 19% | 2% | - | |
38 | BHARGAV Siddharth | 100% | 95% | 71% | 32% | 7% | 1% | |
39 | MARIANI Lou | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 43% |
40 | MONDALA Adrian | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 19% | 3% | - |
42 | LUO Xiao Ran | 100% | 87% | 50% | 15% | 2% | ||
43 | RYAN Chris | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 18% | 2% | |
44 | GREEN Jabreel | 100% | 95% | 66% | 21% | 2% | ||
45 | COVINGTON Max | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 18% | 1% | |
46 | WONG Nathan | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 14% | 2% | |
47 | BERMENDER Eric | 100% | 99% | 87% | 55% | 18% | 2% | - |
48 | GU Aidan | 100% | 95% | 73% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
49 | CHANG Celine | 100% | 86% | 49% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
51 | BEITTEL David | 100% | 97% | 66% | 4% | |||
52 | LEE Kaitlyn | 100% | 63% | 16% | 1% | |||
53 | BHATT Arjun | 100% | 83% | 35% | 7% | - | - | |
54 | HOOPES JR. Richard | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 29% | 4% | |
55 | HOGE William | 100% | 47% | 9% | 1% | - | ||
56 | YU Austin | 100% | 100% | 40% | 6% | - | - | |
57 | MADRID Betsy | 100% | 77% | 37% | 10% | 1% | - | |
58 | ASTLE Stephen | 100% | 92% | 63% | 26% | 5% | ||
59 | GOLDBERG Artie | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 2% | - |
60 | MEWES Katie | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | |
61 | BEATTY Max | 100% | 92% | 63% | 27% | 6% | 1% | |
62 | BLOOMER Suzanne | 100% | 95% | 63% | 20% | 1% | ||
63 | MONTOYA Amy | 100% | 80% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | |
64 | MCDONALD Caden | 100% | 89% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
65 | JOSEPH Jeremy | 100% | 95% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - |
66 | STANICA Teodora | 100% | 26% | 3% | - | - | - | |
66 | BHARGAV Angad | 100% | 57% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
69 | LACKRONE Addison | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
70 | SIMARD Sherrol | 100% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.