Fort Worth, TX - Fort Worth, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GYURE Brayden H. | - | - | - | 3% | 26% | 70% | |
| 2 | SEEFELDT William Henry C. | - | 1% | 7% | 26% | 43% | 23% | |
| 3 | FRAY Alexander | - | - | 1% | 11% | 44% | 44% | |
| 3 | KIM Nathan | - | 5% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 6% | |
| 5 | IMREK Samuel A. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 21% | 76% |
| 6 | LIOZNYANSKY Simon | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 22% | |
| 7 | SHIV Rishi | - | - | 1% | 10% | 46% | 44% | |
| 8 | DAVOODIAN Christopher | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 2% |
| 9 | KARKI Salyan | - | 2% | 19% | 40% | 31% | 8% | |
| 10 | YAO Geoffrey B. | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 8% | |
| 11 | KHANNA Nikhil | - | - | 1% | 14% | 52% | 33% | |
| 12 | PHILLIPS Jeffrey T. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 42% | 43% | |
| 13 | XIAO Andrew | 1% | 10% | 32% | 38% | 17% | 1% | |
| 14 | ODEN Isaac M. | - | - | 3% | 19% | 43% | 34% | |
| 15 | SCOFIELD Thien J. | 1% | 9% | 30% | 39% | 19% | 2% | |
| 16 | MCALISTER Ian | 1% | 10% | 30% | 37% | 18% | 3% | |
| 17 | KARNAS Karol | - | 4% | 24% | 41% | 26% | 5% | |
| 18 | GUAN Nathan | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 19 | SURESH NEERAJ | 1% | 5% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% | - |
| 20 | TIKHOMIROV Theodore | 1% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 16% | 1% | |
| 21 | SEBASTIAN Alexander P. | 12% | 37% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 22 | GAO Zachary | 1% | 17% | 43% | 33% | 6% | - | |
| 23 | LO Jake | 5% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 7% | 1% | |
| 24 | LEE JoonWon | 7% | 29% | 39% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 25 | IMREK Elijah S. | - | 3% | 18% | 40% | 34% | 5% | |
| 26 | MUGA Aiden | 2% | 25% | 44% | 24% | 3% | - | |
| 27 | PHAM Sawyer T. | - | 4% | 24% | 41% | 25% | 5% | |
| 28 | ZHENG Jerry | 3% | 28% | 44% | 22% | 3% | - | |
| 29 | ZHU Eric | 15% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 30 | XIONG Aaron | 14% | 38% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 31 | KOLLARS Jacob | 23% | 43% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | HESSE Hans | 18% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | HERNANDEZ Cole F. | 9% | 33% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 34 | BEATY Trace | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | |
| 35 | ESHONKULOV Aziz | 10% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
| 36 | YU Austin | 31% | 43% | 21% | 5% | - | - | |
| 37 | MADDUX Bryce | 33% | 47% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
| 38 | CHIN Dylan A. | 20% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 39 | RAO Neil | 5% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 40 | BAXTER Max | 39% | 50% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 41 | YARBROUGH Landon | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 42 | POAGE Ian | 19% | 40% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 43 | WEN Ethan | 73% | 24% | 3% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.