Fort Worth, TX - Fort Worth, TX, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | GYURE Brayden H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 70% | |
| 2 | SEEFELDT William Henry C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 23% | |
| 3 | FRAY Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 44% | |
| 3 | KIM Nathan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 34% | 6% | |
| 5 | IMREK Samuel A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 76% |
| 6 | LIOZNYANSKY Simon | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 64% | 22% | |
| 7 | SHIV Rishi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 44% | |
| 8 | DAVOODIAN Christopher | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 24% | 2% |
| 9 | KARKI Salyan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 79% | 39% | 8% | |
| 10 | YAO Geoffrey B. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 41% | 8% | |
| 11 | KHANNA Nikhil | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 85% | 33% | |
| 12 | PHILLIPS Jeffrey T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 43% | |
| 13 | XIAO Andrew | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 19% | 1% | |
| 14 | ODEN Isaac M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 34% | |
| 15 | SCOFIELD Thien J. | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 21% | 2% | |
| 16 | MCALISTER Ian | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 21% | 3% | |
| 17 | KARNAS Karol | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 31% | 5% | |
| 18 | GUAN Nathan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 6% | - |
| 19 | SURESH NEERAJ | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 10% | - |
| 20 | TIKHOMIROV Theodore | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 18% | 1% | |
| 21 | SEBASTIAN Alexander P. | 100% | 88% | 51% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 22 | GAO Zachary | 100% | 99% | 82% | 39% | 6% | - | |
| 23 | LO Jake | 100% | 95% | 72% | 33% | 8% | 1% | |
| 24 | LEE JoonWon | 100% | 93% | 64% | 25% | 4% | - | |
| 25 | IMREK Elijah S. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 38% | 5% | |
| 26 | MUGA Aiden | 100% | 98% | 72% | 28% | 3% | - | |
| 27 | PHAM Sawyer T. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% | 30% | 5% | |
| 28 | ZHENG Jerry | 100% | 97% | 69% | 25% | 3% | - | |
| 29 | ZHU Eric | 100% | 85% | 47% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 30 | XIONG Aaron | 100% | 86% | 48% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 31 | KOLLARS Jacob | 100% | 77% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 32 | HESSE Hans | 100% | 82% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | HERNANDEZ Cole F. | 100% | 91% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 34 | BEATY Trace | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% | |
| 35 | ESHONKULOV Aziz | 100% | 90% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
| 36 | YU Austin | 100% | 69% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
| 37 | MADDUX Bryce | 100% | 67% | 20% | 3% | - | - | |
| 38 | CHIN Dylan A. | 100% | 80% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 39 | RAO Neil | 100% | 95% | 72% | 36% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 40 | BAXTER Max | 100% | 61% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 41 | YARBROUGH Landon | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 42 | POAGE Ian | 100% | 81% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 43 | WEN Ethan | 100% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.