USA Fencing National Championships & July Challenge

Y-12 Men's Épée

Sunday, July 10, 2022 at 8:00 AM

Minneapolis, MN, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 DAVOODIAN Christopher V V V V V V V V V V V V 5.5 6 +0.5
2 DODIN David V D V V V V V V V V V D 5.4 5 -0.4
3 TRULL A.J. V V V D V V V V V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
3 ZHENG Andy V V V V V V V V V V D 5.2 6 +0.8
5 HAMZA Tudor V V V V V V V V V D 5.2 6 +0.8
6 CHEN Zhengyang V V V V V V V V D 3.8 5 +1.2
7 SINGH Ravin V V V V V V V V D 3.2 5 +1.8
8 KIM Jayden V V V V D V V V V D 4.4 5 +0.6
9 KOPPENHEFFER Rowan V V V V V V V V D 3.1 6 +2.9
10 LEE Aiden V V V V V D V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
11 CHOI Zachary V V V D V V V V D 3.9 5 +1.1
12 ERLIKHMAN Adrian V D V V V V V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
13 GRAVES Lawson V V V V D V V V D 3.3 4 +0.7
14 MAO Benjamin D D V V V V V V V D 4.8 4 -0.8
15 CARTY JR Johndale V V V V D D V V V D 4.0 4 -
16 ZENG Andrew D V D V V V V V D 3.0 3 -
17 SOKOL Luke V V V V V V V D 4.2 6 +1.8
18 BUI Henry V V V V V V V D 3.8 6 +2.2
19 DONAHUE Lake V V V V V V D 3.6 5 +1.4
20 TWEMLOW Sacha V V V V V V V D 3.2 6 +2.8
21 ELHUSSEINI Dylan V V V V D V V D 5.2 5 -0.2
22 NAKAS Levent V V V V D V V D 4.9 5 +0.1
23 LIOZNYANSKY Miron V V D V V V V D 3.1 5 +1.9
24 LIU Adam V V D V V V V D 3.4 5 +1.6
25 LAM Alan V V V D V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
26 SERAFYM Damian V V V V D V V D 3.3 4 +0.7
27 MITEV Alexander D D V V V V V V D 4.6 4 -0.6
28 LAI Boden D D V V V V V V D 4.1 4 -0.1
29 PARK Sangwook V V V D V D V V D 4.5 4 -0.5
30 CORBIN Bennett V D V V V D V V D 4.7 4 -0.7
31 HERNDON Liam V D V D V D V V D 3.1 3 -0.1
32 FENG shang D D V D D V V V D 3.8 2 -1.8
33 LOISEAU Oscar V V V V V V D 4.0 6 +2.0
34 SAUNIER Cameron V V V V V V D 3.9 6 +2.1
35 YANG Gary V V V V V V D 3.1 6 +2.9
36 ELHUSSEINI Kyle V D V V V V D 4.9 5 +0.1
37 LU Jacob D V V V V V D 3.6 5 +1.4
38 ALI Farhan V V D V V V D 3.9 5 +1.1
39 MANGAN Hunter V V D V V V D 1.8 4 +2.2
40 RUSSELL Michael V V D V V V D 2.1 4 +1.9
41 ZIEGLER John V D V V V D V D 3.2 4 +0.8
42 KIM Teddy V V D V V D V D 3.1 4 +0.9
43 FRANGER Max D V V D V V V D 3.2 4 +0.8
44 CHEN Leonardo D V V D V V V D 3.4 4 +0.6
45 LIU Yueri V D V D V V V D 3.9 4 +0.1
46 MEHROTRA Neel V V V D V D V D 4.4 4 -0.4
47 ZAHRAN Aiden D V V V D V V D 3.4 4 +0.6
48 LEE DoWon D V V V D V V D 2.8 4 +1.2
49 LEE Inwoo V V D V D V V D 4.6 4 -0.6
50 REAGAN Henry V D V D V V V D 4.5 4 -0.5
51 TAI Edison D V D V V V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
52 BORISENKO Samuel V D D V V V D 2.3 3 +0.7
53 KUGLER Luke V D D V V V D 2.7 3 +0.3
54 VYSOTSKIY Evan V D D V D V V D 3.4 3 -0.4
55 WANG Joey D D V D V V V D 4.2 3 -1.2
56 MIDYANY Evan D V D D V V V D 2.7 3 +0.3
57 GINZBURG Adam V V D V D D V D 3.9 3 -0.9
57 CHEN Bowen D V D V D V V D 3.3 3 -0.3
59 SOBESHKEVYCH ROMAN D D V D V V V D 2.5 3 +0.5
60 KUPPUSAMY Kotravel D V D V V D V D 2.3 3 +0.7
61 MODANLOU Navid D D V V D V D 2.4 2 -0.4
62 CHUTKAY Sai Pratham D V D V D V D 3.3 2 -1.3
63 HEADRICK Jack D D V V D D V D 3.6 2 -1.6
64 YILMAZ Tarik D V D D D V D 2.9 1 -1.9
65 SIEDOW William D V V V V D 1.5 4 +2.5
66 JOHNSON Soren D V D V V V D 2.1 4 +1.9
67 NILSEN Mark V V V V D D D 1.9 4 +2.1
68 DODIN Daniel M. V V D D V V D 3.5 4 +0.5
69 LIU Josh V D V D V D 3.1 3 -0.1
70 JAIN Samyak V V D D V D D 3.7 3 -0.7
71 MANA Arnav V V D V D D D 2.3 3 +0.7
72 OSBORN Hunter V V V D D D D 4.8 3 -1.8
73 NOVOJILOV Daniel V V D V D D D 2.1 3 +0.9
74 DECKER Hunter V D D V D V D 2.2 3 +0.8
75 SINGLETON Aman D D V V D V D 2.6 3 +0.4
76 BRADSHAW Carter D V D V V D D 3.0 3 -
77 HUANG Kenneth D D V D V D 2.6 2 -0.6
78 DODDAPANENI Aarav V D V D D D 2.3 2 -0.3
79 RAHMAN Ali V D V D D D 3.2 2 -1.2
80 TUSANTOSO McKenzie D V D D V D 2.9 2 -0.9
80 AHN EZRA D D D V V D 1.7 2 +0.3
82 ELMARSAFI Nurideen D V D V D D 1.5 2 +0.5
83 BAKKEN Archer V V D D D D D 1.9 2 +0.1
84 KUANG Bryan V D D V D D D 2.8 2 -0.8
85 MOORE Alexander V D D D D V D 3.2 2 -1.2
86 PAN Anthony V D D D D V D 1.6 2 +0.4
87 CZEPLA Andrew V D D D V D D 2.4 2 -0.4
88 ARMSTRONG TyLee V D D V D D D 2.5 2 -0.5
89 WU Nathan D D D D V V D 2.6 2 -0.6
90 SOLARZ Arthur D V D D D V D 1.2 2 +0.8
91 LI Ray D D D V D V D 1.2 2 +0.8
92 YAO Tristan D D V D V D D 2.9 2 -0.9
93 RAHMAN Zayd D D V D V D D 2.0 2 -
94 ROSADO Balthazar Francisco D D D D V V D 0.9 2 +1.1
95 KANG Brandon D V V D D D D 2.4 2 -0.4
96 DOAN Christopher D V D D D V D 1.9 2 +0.1
97 LEUNG Dylan D D V V D D D 2.9 2 -0.9
98 SHCHUR Grayson D V D V D D D 3.6 2 -1.6
99 GOROZA Eric D D V D D D 0.9 1 +0.1
100 MA Ryan V D D D D D 1.1 1 -0.1
101 JIANG Oscar D D V D D D 2.3 1 -1.3
102 TUMULA Arihaan D V D D D D D 1.3 1 -0.3
103 SHAFFER Tyler V D D D D D 1.9 1 -0.9
104 KIM Tae V D D D D D 3.2 1 -2.2
104 PARK Aiden V D D D D D 2.3 1 -1.3
106 GUO Lucas D D D D V D 2.1 1 -1.1
107 NORMILE Nicholas D D D D V D 2.5 1 -1.5
108 STARKIE Kitteridge D D D D D V 2.1 1 -1.1
109 FU Adrian D D D V D D 1.4 1 -0.4
110 KLINKNER Richard V D D D D D 2.2 1 -1.2
111 DAI Chengwen V D D D D D 1.8 1 -0.8
112 SRINIVASAN Sanat Ram D D D V D D 1.0 1 -
113 HANNA Alexander D D V D D D 0.2 1 +0.8
114 KIM Henry D D V D D D 2.2 1 -1.2
115 KONG Brandon D D D D D D 1.9 0 -1.9
116 MAXU Tiger D D D D D 2.2 0 -2.2
117 KE Sebastian D D D D D D 1.4 0 -1.4
118 CAFASSO Alexander D D D D D 2.0 0 -2.0
118 RONG Gordon D D D D D 2.0 0 -2.0
120 KIM Alexander D D D D D D 1.6 0 -1.6
120 HARGREAVES Ryan D D D D D D 2.2 0 -2.2
120 HSU Joshua D D D D D D 0.8 0 -0.8
123 WAGHOLIKAR Prathit D D D D D D 1.0 0 -1.0
124 KIM Remington D D D D D D 1.0 0 -1.0
125 KIM Julian D D D D D D 1.9 0 -1.9
126 NOOL Alexander D D D D D D 0.8 0 -0.8
127 ROSIELLO Francesco D D D D D 0.7 0 -0.7
128 CLARKSON Moby D D D D D D 1.8 0 -1.8

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.