Rank | Name | Strength |
Conservative Estimate* Cons. Est.* |
180-day Trend |
Rating |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Boudreaux, James | 2512 | 2246 | 69 | A25 |
2 | WANG, Joey | 2338 | 2081 | 99 | A25 |
3 | Lai, QiYong | 2482 | 2062 | 15 | C24 |
4 | Park, Sangwook | 2310 | 2057 | 88 | A25 |
5 | Kim, Henry | 2289 | 2030 | 9 | A25 |
6 | Li, Jinyuan | 3010 | 1992 | - | U |
7 | Huang, Kenneth | 2201 | 1948 | 68 | A25 |
8 | Zhao, Michael(Junyi) | 2193 | 1932 | 40 | A25 |
9 | Wu, Yuk Pak | 2817 | 1901 | - | U |
10 | Yang, Gary | 2145 | 1890 | 6 | A25 |
11 | Singleton, Aman | 2103 | 1847 | 86 | A25 |
12 | Mehrotra, Neel | 2091 | 1836 | 81 | B25 |
13 | Kim, Seoheul | 3250 | 1786 | 595 | E25 |
14 | Addleman, Joshua | 2034 | 1781 | 197 | C25 |
15 | Chen, Jayden | 1975 | 1725 | 93 | B25 |
16 | Liu, Edmond | 2880 | 1720 | - | U |
17 | Rosado, Balthazar Francisco | 1955 | 1702 | 9 | A25 |
18 | WANG, JIAZHE | 2668 | 1701 | - | U |
19 | ZHANG, JUNTENG | 2996 | 1681 | - | U |
20 | Moore, Alexander | 1930 | 1674 | 98 | C25 |
21 | Liu, Zicheng | 1892 | 1635 | 7 | A25 |
22 | Mulcahy, Sebastian | 1930 | 1632 | 11 | D25 |
23 | Gacioch, Noah | 1874 | 1624 | 117 | A25 |
24 | Shchur, Grayson | 1873 | 1621 | 52 | B25 |
25 | Lee, Anton | 1873 | 1619 | 36 | B25 |
26 | Cho, Alex | 1868 | 1610 | 27 | C25 |
27 | Kaba, Elias | 1865 | 1610 | 92 | C25 |
28 | Zhang, Albert | 1870 | 1609 | 35 | C25 |
29 | Rong, Gordon | 1855 | 1603 | 17 | C25 |
30 | Li, Grayson | 1841 | 1593 | 264 | C25 |
31 | Ramirez Cardona, Sebastian | 2467 | 1584 | 1584 | U |
32 | Ng, Nico | 1823 | 1566 | 223 | B25 |
33 | Lewis, Michael | 1798 | 1546 | 127 | B25 |
34 | Yang, Ethan | 1936 | 1542 | 280 | D25 |
35 | Mayo, Matt Jacob | 2088 | 1539 | - | U |
36 | Wang, Marcus | 1777 | 1529 | 131 | C25 |
37 | Yilmaz, Tarik | 1775 | 1521 | 59 | D25 |
38 | Wang, Devin | 1775 | 1519 | 62 | C25 |
39 | Voo, Lucas | 1770 | 1519 | 232 | C25 |
40 | Mittelstaedt, Isaiah | 1804 | 1512 | 182 | D25 |
41 | Guo, Derrick | 2101 | 1509 | - | U |
42 | Cui, Jiakang | 2084 | 1507 | - | U |
* The ranking is determined by the conservative estimate of the strength, which reduces uncertainty about the ratings to about 1%. Only athletes with estimates over 1500 and whose ratings are reasonably certain are included on this list.