Recruiting Rankings
Men's EpeeBirth Year 2012
Track the strongest fencers in this class year and compare direct elimination or pool-only strength with a built-in 180-day trend.
| Rank | Name | Rating | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kim, Gene | 2790 | 2519 | 64 | A26 |
| 2 | Dodin, Daniel | 2638 | 2380 | 61 | A26 |
| 3 | Shin, Yubin | 2771 | 2286 | 512 | A26 |
| 4 | Midyany, Ryan | 2430 | 2177 | 114 | A26 |
| 5 | Mazaheri, Fletcher | 2429 | 2172 | - | B25 |
| 6 | Zhao, Nathan | 2609 | 2146 | 543 | A26 |
| 7 | Parke, Nathaniel | 2353 | 2102 | 12 | A26 |
| 8 | Fu, Nolan | 2293 | 2043 | 66 | A26 |
| 9 | Liu, Andy | 2522 | 2038 | - | U |
| 10 | Xue, Michael | 2272 | 2020 | 6 | A26 |
| 11 | Ali, Rayan | 2238 | 1971 | 72 | B26 |
| 12 | Zhou, Shawn | 2277 | 1970 | - | E23 |
| 13 | Mikhail, Lucas | 2215 | 1962 | 20 | B26 |
| 14 | Krotz, Nicolas | 2197 | 1945 | 124 | A26 |
| 15 | Chen, Tianjun | 2196 | 1944 | 41 | A25 |
| 16 | Fong, Kobe | 2214 | 1909 | 13 | B26 |
| 17 | Rubin, Nathan | 2288 | 1903 | 285 | B26 |
| 18 | Boran, Brooks | 2138 | 1884 | 107 | B26 |
| 19 | Eng, Kyler | 2124 | 1874 | 25 | B26 |
| 20 | Ellis, IV, Floyd | 2130 | 1874 | 62 | B26 |
| 21 | Mostovoy, Philip | 2143 | 1871 | - | D26 |
| 22 | Tudela, Francisco | 2163 | 1871 | 155 | B26 |
| 23 | Tang, Michael | 2119 | 1866 | 30 | B26 |
| 24 | Wong, Aaron | 2111 | 1858 | 41 | B26 |
| 25 | Yao, Tristan | 2101 | 1853 | 114 | B26 |
| 26 | Chen, Borui | 2981 | 1851 | - | U |
| 27 | Wychulis, Tristan | 2135 | 1836 | 84 | C26 |
| 28 | Cho, Adrian | 2086 | 1835 | 211 | A26 |
| 29 | Kim, Leejay | 2104 | 1826 | 32 | A26 |
| 30 | Wang, Lucas | 2067 | 1820 | 104 | A26 |
| 31 | Mou, Jaydon | 2095 | 1818 | 1 | C26 |
| 32 | Chang, Matthew | 2068 | 1816 | 103 | B26 |
| 33 | Zheng, Jason | 2051 | 1802 | 183 | B26 |
| 34 | Shim, Jae | 2041 | 1783 | 52 | C26 |
| 35 | White, Ryden | 2054 | 1780 | 4 | D26 |
| 36 | Ramirez, Hunter | 2033 | 1766 | 414 | B26 |
| 37 | Kats, Brandon | 2018 | 1765 | 46 | B26 |
| 38 | Kim, Julian | 2009 | 1762 | 28 | C26 |
| 39 | Ruan, Yichen | 2069 | 1760 | 139 | B26 |
| 40 | Toyofuku, Lucas | 2025 | 1753 | 92 | C26 |
| 41 | Myrah, Devin | 2008 | 1753 | 88 | C26 |
| 42 | Challamel, Hadrien | 2013 | 1748 | 126 | B26 |
| 43 | Wu, Matthew | 1994 | 1745 | 102 | A26 |
| 44 | Parra, Lucas | 1985 | 1730 | 126 | C26 |
| 45 | Zhou, Zhi Matthew | 1988 | 1718 | 60 | C26 |
| 46 | Bhandare, Veer | 1955 | 1699 | 4 | B26 |
| 47 | Rong, Marcus | 1938 | 1689 | 23 | B26 |
| 48 | Song, Aidan | 1926 | 1679 | 25 | C26 |
| 49 | Kiciman, Leo | 1956 | 1671 | 48 | B26 |
| 50 | Liu, Andrew | 1955 | 1658 | 28 | C26 |
| 51 | Cash, William Li | 1957 | 1655 | 11 | A26 |
| 52 | Peters, Keane | 1970 | 1642 | 50 | C26 |
| 53 | Cheung, Houston | 2974 | 1639 | - | U |
| 54 | Thomas, Andrew | 1895 | 1637 | 2 | C26 |
| 55 | Kim, Doyun | 1894 | 1634 | 18 | B26 |
| 56 | Qu, RuiTing | 1896 | 1624 | - | D26 |
| 57 | Hantov, Adrian | 1871 | 1606 | 78 | B26 |
| 58 | Danilov, Artur | 1859 | 1597 | 135 | B26 |
| 59 | Kim, Daniel | 1961 | 1597 | 30 | C26 |
| 60 | Mana, Sameer | 1887 | 1595 | - | U |
| 61 | Strafford, Andrew | 1829 | 1579 | 123 | C26 |
| 62 | Toy, Tanner | 1899 | 1577 | 136 | C26 |
| 63 | Khersonsky, Robert | 1838 | 1575 | 10 | D25 |
| 64 | Dang, William | 1864 | 1571 | 74 | C26 |
| 65 | Yakhnis, Seth | 1823 | 1564 | 2 | B26 |
| 66 | Lin, Daniel | 1812 | 1560 | 6 | C26 |
| 67 | Kim, Daniel | 1839 | 1549 | 277 | B26 |
| 68 | Ramirez, Tristan | 1824 | 1548 | 169 | C26 |
| 69 | Feely, Benjamin | 1805 | 1544 | 38 | C25 |
| 70 | Nguyen, Ethan V. | 1803 | 1542 | 40 | B26 |
| 71 | Ma, Nolan | 1789 | 1527 | 31 | E26 |
| 72 | Schipper, Johann | 1796 | 1525 | 94 | B26 |
| 73 | Alpsoy, Emir | 1868 | 1525 | 62 | D26 |
| 74 | Headrick, Liam | 1856 | 1524 | - | U |
| 75 | Perry, Noah | 1796 | 1521 | 29 | E25 |
| 76 | Burdick, Elijah | 1883 | 1515 | 109 | B26 |
| 77 | LUCENAY, Samuel | 1857 | 1506 | 274 | B26 |
| 78 | Wang, Juehan | 1767 | 1502 | 49 | C26 |
| 79 | Kim, Evan | 1776 | 1501 | - | U |
| 80 | Liu, Daniel | 1797 | 1501 | 26 | C26 |
* The ranking is determined by the conservative estimate of the strength, which reduces uncertainty about the ratings to about 1%. Only athletes with estimates over 1500 and whose ratings are reasonably certain are included on this list.