Strength Ranking

Men's Epee, Birth Year 2009

Rank Name Strength Conservative
Estimate*
Cons. Est.*
180-day
Trend
Rating
1 Dodin, David 3079 2823 31 A25
2 Yue, Hongrui 3091 2819 48 A24
3 Rubin, Daniel 3081 2778 139 A25
4 Davoodian, Christopher 3008 2749 54 A25
5 Mao, Benjamin 2972 2717 79 A25
6 Hamza, Tudor 2853 2597 81 A24
7 Chung, Ethan Sheng Xuan 2829 2561 190 A25
8 Li, Tin Shing 3278 2513 839 E24
9 Lam, Alan 2717 2464 66 A25
10 Trull, A.J. 2710 2454 119 A24
11 Lai, Boden 2694 2443 55 A25
12 Chen, Leonardo 2688 2434 1 A24
13 Choi, Zachary 2690 2433 173 A24
14 Mitev, Alexander 2650 2394 23 A25
15 Xiao, Hanzhi (Shawn) 2637 2374 79 A24
16 PAN, Boru 3454 2358 2358 U
17 He, Kaixuan 2758 2355 37 A23
18 Kugler, Luke 2610 2351 46 A24
19 Erlikhman, Adrian 2565 2311 2 A24
20 Serafym, Damian 2583 2304 68 B25
21 SOBESHKEVYCH, ROMAN 2543 2291 48 A25
22 Ziegler, John 2543 2289 67 A25
23 Ginzburg, Adam 2537 2285 109 A24
24 Jain, Samyak 2523 2268 99 A24
25 Graves, Lawson 2500 2245 156 A24
26 Lee, Aiden 2462 2211 153 A25
27 Doubov, Andrew 2456 2205 107 A24
28 Lee, Christopher 2667 2194 - C23
29 Singh, Ravin 2446 2193 105 A25
30 Simmes, Jackson 2522 2192 3 B23
31 Zhai, Avalo 2471 2180 1 B24
32 Carty JR, Johndale 2438 2174 4 B24
33 Kim, Jayden 2425 2173 11 B24
34 Bui, Henry 2437 2173 36 B24
35 Shousha, Hamza 2406 2152 57 C25
36 Yanamandra, Sidhansh 2402 2124 8 C24
37 Lee, Inwoo 2377 2113 13 C23
38 Romano, Ren 2518 2111 44 D24
39 Kim, Teddy 2353 2088 57 B24
40 Sokol, Luke 2355 2087 68 A24
41 Saunier, Cameron 2323 2072 35 A25
42 Lasiychuk, Nikita 2383 2055 246 A24
43 Karimov, Amir 2310 2050 77 A25
44 Duko, Phillip 2345 2039 141 B24
45 Ali, Farhan 2287 2036 17 B24
46 Lee, Jayden 2314 2035 40 B24
47 Gonzalez, Kian 2310 2034 80 C24
48 Osborn, Hunter 2302 2033 14 C25
49 Modanlou, Navid 2281 2028 16 A25
50 Franger, Max 2288 2028 84 B24
51 Donahue, Lake 2280 2016 47 B23
52 Alalami, Amer 2479 2006 11 B23
53 Li, Yunji (Rain) 2257 2002 65 A24

* The ranking is determined by the conservative estimate of the strength, which reduces uncertainty about the ratings to about 1%. Only athletes with estimates over 2000 and whose ratings are reasonably certain are included on this list.