Strength Ranking

Men's Foil, Birth Year 2012

Rank Name Strength Conservative
Estimate* Cons. Est.* 		180-day
Trend		 Rating
1 Chen, Hanson 2761 2499 102 A24
2 kim, taylor 3828 2469 - U
3 Yoon, Byungheon 3323 2460 86 U
4 Zhou, Chenqiao 2923 2454 82 C23
5 Mazaheri, Fletcher 2462 2206 92 B24
6 Hou, Gaven 2232 1981 165 D25
7 Fu, Shihshan 3135 1981 1981 U
8 Ge, Felix Fei 2225 1970 193 E24
9 Lee, Jaden 2306 1966 219 C25
10 Li, Lucas 2190 1932 76 D24
11 Zhou, Shawn 2190 1926 36 E24
12 Yang, Charles 2175 1925 2 C24
13 Yu, ShiYu (Henry) 2171 1915 78 D25
14 Kim, Seojun 3068 1891 1891 U
15 Fukuda, Brando 2140 1888 11 E24
16 Chang, Jeremy 2139 1887 30 U
17 Tang, Royce 2099 1846 55 E25
18 Pan, Ethan 2098 1842 67 D24
19 Oh, Christopher 2124 1841 9 E24
20 Yee, Colin 2096 1801 216 U
21 Bedworth, Alistair 2108 1792 259 U
22 Wang, Elijah (QiChen) 2048 1789 100 C25
23 Grigoriev, Michael 2041 1787 16 E24
24 Bhupathiraju, Arjun 2088 1786 40 U
25 Jazwinski, Ryan 2036 1778 127 D24
26 You, Alan 2045 1769 18 D24
27 Liu, Aaron 2306 1751 1751 E25
28 Lee, Abin 2019 1750 271 U
29 Ho, Christopher 1950 1681 128 U
30 Yang, Tate 1958 1676 45 U
31 Plummer, Waylon 1926 1671 16 U
32 YE, Jerry 1933 1671 94 E24
33 Yu, Eric 2105 1663 116 D24
34 Czarnecki, Thomas 1920 1656 41 U
35 Kingsley, Griffin 1898 1647 66 D25
36 Hickman, Noah 3383 1647 1647 U
37 Ganapathi, Eshan 1923 1646 243 U
38 Kim, Gene 1955 1642 - D24
39 He, Haoxuan 2976 1615 1615 U
40 wang, sicheng 1885 1591 16 U
41 Novikov, Yann 1861 1580 21 U
42 Tsui, Raedyn Ho Hin 1831 1565 25 E24
43 Kuang, Vincent 1860 1544 86 U
44 Crossett, Peter 3365 1530 1530 U
45 Hong, Edwin 1803 1529 95 E25
46 He, Ian 1785 1525 23 U
47 Kim, Daniel 1813 1524 308 U
48 Ren, Ryan 1767 1516 1 U
49 Lu, Hansen 1786 1514 3 U
50 HONGYI, YANG 2864 1510 - U
51 Zeng, Albert 1773 1506 43 U
52 Guo, Austin 1810 1496 115 U
53 Yu, ShiLin (Harry) 1759 1493 10 U
54 RYU, GREYSON 1852 1482 306 U
55 Zhang, Yankai 1768 1477 75 U
56 Waterfield, Lysander 1849 1475 21 U
57 Qian, Zekai 1729 1471 7 U
58 Jin, Xuechong Daniel 1744 1466 99 E24
59 Huang, Jinyao 1725 1465 17 U
60 Susanto, William 1911 1457 275 U
61 Castillo, Hector 2641 1451 189 U
62 Zhao, Jason 1760 1449 20 U
63 Mao, Runxian 1738 1437 13 U
64 Wenger, Rowan 1707 1410 46 E25
65 Jorge, Elijah 1723 1404 4 U
66 Zhang, Ethan 1702 1393 72 U
67 Ulysse, Jacob 1641 1370 7 U
68 Post, Bentley 1915 1370 281 U
69 Kiayias, Alexander 1648 1369 98 U
70 Li, Jayden 1665 1364 210 U
71 Chen, Jason 1649 1357 42 U
72 Symmank, Callen 1666 1345 121 U
73 Frel, Vincent 1675 1338 27 U
74 Kim, Parker 1816 1333 1333 U
75 Zheng, Jonathan 1660 1332 159 U
76 Cui, Max 1736 1330 75 U
77 Roberts, Nikolai 1696 1330 9 U
78 Fayvusovich, Emmanual 1832 1317 313 U
79 Chen, Kurtis 1694 1317 507 U
80 Xia, Philip 1680 1315 80 U
81 Lee, seungje 2669 1305 1305 U
82 Arora, Maximilian Andras 1682 1295 136 U
83 Wang, Ancen 1555 1283 21 U
84 Nemi, Vin 1634 1280 294 U
85 Fischer, Grant 1854 1276 85 U
86 HA, JUWON 2320 1274 1274 U
87 Alcazaren, Cian 1669 1265 371 U
88 Leung, Tsun Yin (TY) 1971 1262 - U
89 shaw, eric 1534 1258 78 U
90 Choi, Hunter 1540 1252 239 U
91 Ray, Callum 1638 1249 9 U
92 Li, Andy 1645 1245 407 U
93 Marcus, Vincent 1630 1235 160 U
94 Ramkumar, Eeshan 1680 1234 - U
95 Brown, Owen 2506 1217 557 U
96 Cheung, Iain 1984 1200 1200 U
97 Ha, Varick 2665 1191 1191 U
98 Musson, Miles 2910 1189 1189 U
99 Sun, Nathan 1625 1187 36 U
100 Kuperberg, Thomas 1741 1184 1184 U
101 Minn, Nathan 1649 1182 35 U
102 Huber, Zion 2369 1180 1180 U
103 Omohundro, Lane 1574 1171 50 U
104 Fine, Matthew 2221 1170 1170 U
105 Chang, Austin 1656 1159 179 U
106 Tarchichi, Daniel 1660 1150 296 U
107 Wong, Connor 1519 1144 69 U
108 Li, Xingmo 1915 1135 154 U
109 Tang, Brayden 1584 1128 387 U
110 Converso-Parsons, Alexander 1426 1117 18 U
111 He, Gary 1428 1104 81 U
112 Payne, Lynas 1472 1092 47 U
113 Tran, Andrew 1821 1083 465 U
114 Bu, Ethan 1508 1082 258 U
115 Kubba, Krish 1465 1060 1060 U
116 Lin, Alden 1465 1045 1045 U
117 Wang, Freyr 1450 1034 1034 U
118 Chen, Shi 2246 1034 365 U
119 Kwong, Colin 1338 1009 204 U

* The ranking is determined by the conservative estimate of the strength, which reduces uncertainty about the ratings to about 1%. Only athletes with estimates over 1000 and whose ratings are reasonably certain are included on this list.