Strength Ranking

Men's Foil, Birth Year 2012

Rank Name Strength Conservative
Estimate*
Cons. Est.*
180-day
Trend
Rating
1 Chen, Hanson 2947 2688 143 A26
2 Zhou, Chenqiao 2913 2606 73 A26
3 He, Haoxuan 3418 2563 948 A26
4 Mazaheri, Fletcher 2675 2417 43 A26
5 Lee, Jaden 2454 2186 53 A25
6 Bedworth, Alistair 2390 2125 240 C26
7 Zhou, Shawn 2372 2118 87 B26
8 Hou, Gaven 2365 2109 20 B25
9 Wang, Elijah (QiChen) 2354 2102 75 B26
10 Liu, Aaron 2374 2071 66 B26
11 Yoon, Byungheon 2710 2069 149 E25
12 Pan, Ethan 2305 2055 90 C26
13 Ge, Felix Fei 2276 2024 15 C26
14 Fukuda, Brando 2216 1963 13 C25
15 Yang, Charles 2211 1957 22 C26
16 Li, Lucas 2209 1956 36 C26
17 Oh, Christopher 2186 1931 16 C26
18 Lee, Abin 2175 1924 79 B26
19 Yu, ShiYu (Henry) 2142 1886 - D25
20 Kim, Daniel 2125 1871 162 C25
21 Chang, Jeremy 2102 1853 43 D25
22 You, Alan 2097 1833 12 D26
23 Tang, Royce 2070 1819 13 D26
24 Jazwinski, Ryan 2047 1796 87 C26
25 Huber, Zion 2788 1793 426 U
26 Plummer, Waylon 2040 1791 91 B25
27 Yee, Colin 2048 1790 42 E25
28 Czarnecki, Thomas 2038 1787 103 D25
29 Kingsley, Griffin 2000 1746 25 D26
30 Bhupathiraju, Arjun 1994 1729 5 D26
31 Leung, Tsun Yin (TY) 2113 1727 122 E26
32 Ganapathi, Eshan 1975 1721 54 C26
33 Grigoriev, Michael 1949 1696 54 E24
34 Yang, Tate 1958 1696 13 E26
35 Yu, Eric 2072 1685 - D25
36 Ho, Christopher 1938 1683 11 D25
37 Hong, Edwin 1932 1680 163 E26
38 YE, Jerry 1923 1670 4 E26
39 Kwong, Zenith (Zeni) 3444 1658 1658 U
40 Kim, Gene 1955 1642 - D24
41 Tang, Brayden 1932 1642 163 C25
42 wang, sicheng 1896 1636 24 E25
43 Novikov, Yann 1898 1629 27 E26
44 Guo, Austin 1883 1616 39 C26
45 He, Ian 1848 1594 47 E25
46 Ryu, Greyson 1847 1570 92 D26
47 Lin, Wilson 1887 1551 495 D26
48 Zhao, Jason 1805 1544 46 C25
49 Jin, Xuechong Daniel (Daniel) 1799 1541 6 E25
50 Tsui, Raedyn Ho Hin 1794 1538 58 D25
51 Alcazaren, Cian 1830 1535 93 E26
52 Kiayias, Alexander 1790 1531 94 A26
53 Susanto, William 1808 1525 50 D25

* The ranking is determined by the conservative estimate of the strength, which reduces uncertainty about the ratings to about 1%. Only athletes with estimates over 1500 and whose ratings are reasonably certain are included on this list.