Strength Ranking

Men's Foil, Birth Year 2012

Rank Name Strength Conservative
Estimate*
Cons. Est.*
180-day
Trend
Rating
1 Chen, Hanson 2934 2676 110 A26
2 Zhou, Chenqiao 2902 2578 146 A25
3 kim, taylor 3828 2469 - U
4 Mazaheri, Fletcher 2646 2388 14 B25
5 Yoon, Byungheon 2946 2218 - E25
6 Lee, Jaden 2484 2212 107 A25
7 Hou, Gaven 2354 2098 80 B25
8 Bedworth, Alistair 2358 2092 221 C25
9 Zhou, Shawn 2320 2066 43 B25
10 Wang, Elijah (QiChen) 2303 2051 108 C25
11 Liu, Aaron 2366 2050 201 C25
12 Pan, Ethan 2282 2032 100 C25
13 Ge, Felix Fei 2264 2012 - C25
14 Fu, Shihshan 3135 1981 - U
15 Fukuda, Brando 2233 1980 20 C25
16 Yang, Charles 2217 1963 34 C25
17 Oh, Christopher 2203 1944 74 C25
18 Li, Lucas 2184 1931 - C25
19 Kim, Seojun 3068 1891 - U
20 Kim, Daniel 2141 1888 214 C25
21 Yu, ShiYu (Henry) 2142 1886 21 D25
22 Lee, Abin 2134 1882 64 C25
23 Chang, Jeremy 2118 1869 27 D25
24 Tang, Royce 2078 1826 1 D25
25 You, Alan 2084 1819 2 D24
26 Yee, Colin 2063 1805 55 E25
27 Plummer, Waylon 2015 1768 98 B25
28 Kingsley, Griffin 2004 1749 18 D25
29 Jazwinski, Ryan 2000 1749 22 C25
30 Czarnecki, Thomas 1989 1734 49 D25
31 Bhupathiraju, Arjun 1996 1727 15 D26
32 Grigoriev, Michael 1962 1707 71 E24
33 Yang, Tate 1969 1706 13 U
34 Ganapathi, Eshan 1958 1702 66 D25
35 Yu, Eric 2072 1685 - D25
36 Ho, Christopher 1941 1684 25 D25
37 Leung, Tsun Yin (TY) 2086 1670 65 E25
38 Kwong, Zenith (Zeni) 3444 1658 1658 U
39 wang, sicheng 1908 1648 31 E25
40 Kim, Gene 1955 1642 - D24
41 Tang, Brayden 1935 1637 217 C25
42 YE, Jerry 1887 1634 43 E24
43 Guo, Austin 1893 1624 42 E25
44 Novikov, Yann 1889 1618 43 E26
45 He, Haoxuan 2976 1615 - U
46 Hong, Edwin 1835 1581 36 E25
47 Ryu, Greyson 1860 1576 96 D25
48 Tsui, Raedyn Ho Hin 1809 1552 24 E25
49 He, Ian 1807 1551 10 E25
50 Alcazaren, Cian 1836 1535 122 E26
51 Zhao, Jason 1797 1533 40 C25
52 Jin, Xuechong Daniel (Daniel) 1791 1531 19 E25
53 Kiayias, Alexander 1783 1525 81 B25
54 Susanto, William 1820 1522 28 D25
55 Huber, Zion 2595 1514 147 U
56 HONGYI, YANG 2864 1510 - U

* The ranking is determined by the conservative estimate of the strength, which reduces uncertainty about the ratings to about 1%. Only athletes with estimates over 1500 and whose ratings are reasonably certain are included on this list.