Strength Ranking

Men's Foil, Birth Year 2012

Rank Name Strength Conservative
Estimate*
Cons. Est.*
180-day
Trend
Rating
1 Chen, Hanson 2911 2651 85 A25
2 Zhou, Chenqiao 2902 2578 146 A25
3 kim, taylor 3828 2469 - U
4 Mazaheri, Fletcher 2630 2373 1 B25
5 Yoon, Byungheon 2946 2218 - E25
6 Lee, Jaden 2490 2217 112 A25
7 Hou, Gaven 2352 2096 78 B25
8 Bedworth, Alistair 2340 2071 200 C25
9 Zhou, Shawn 2323 2069 46 B25
10 Wang, Elijah (QiChen) 2299 2049 106 C25
11 Liu, Aaron 2348 2018 169 C25
12 Pan, Ethan 2264 2014 82 C25
13 Ge, Felix Fei 2264 2012 - C25
14 Fukuda, Brando 2238 1986 26 C25
15 Fu, Shihshan 3135 1981 - U
16 Yang, Charles 2232 1977 20 C25
17 Oh, Christopher 2189 1929 59 C25
18 Lee, Abin 2168 1916 98 C25
19 Li, Lucas 2162 1909 22 C25
20 Kim, Seojun 3068 1891 - U
21 Yu, ShiYu (Henry) 2142 1886 21 D25
22 Chang, Jeremy 2118 1869 27 D25
23 Kim, Daniel 2119 1865 191 C25
24 Tang, Royce 2085 1833 8 D25
25 You, Alan 2084 1819 2 D24
26 Yee, Colin 2063 1805 55 E25
27 Plummer, Waylon 2027 1779 109 B25
28 Bhupathiraju, Arjun 2016 1745 3 D26
29 Kingsley, Griffin 1992 1737 6 D25
30 Czarnecki, Thomas 1989 1734 49 D25
31 Jazwinski, Ryan 1968 1716 11 C25
32 Yang, Tate 1969 1705 14 U
33 Grigoriev, Michael 1957 1703 75 E24
34 Ganapathi, Eshan 1958 1702 66 D25
35 Yu, Eric 2072 1685 - D25
36 Ho, Christopher 1930 1674 15 D25
37 Leung, Tsun Yin (TY) 2086 1670 65 E25
38 Kwong, Zenith 3444 1658 1658 U
39 YE, Jerry 1908 1655 22 E24
40 Kim, Gene 1955 1642 - D24
41 wang, sicheng 1895 1633 16 E25
42 Novikov, Yann 1889 1618 43 E26
43 He, Haoxuan 2976 1615 - U
44 Tang, Brayden 1902 1595 175 C25
45 Guo, Austin 1858 1586 4 E25
46 Ryu, Greyson 1862 1578 98 D25
47 Hong, Edwin 1832 1577 32 E25
48 Tsui, Raedyn Ho Hin 1829 1571 5 E25
49 He, Ian 1813 1557 4 E25
50 Zhao, Jason 1816 1551 58 C25
51 Jin, Xuechong Daniel 1793 1533 17 E25
52 Susanto, William 1820 1522 28 D25
53 Huber, Zion 2595 1514 147 U
54 HONGYI, YANG 2864 1510 - U
55 Alcazaren, Cian 1811 1503 90 E25

* The ranking is determined by the conservative estimate of the strength, which reduces uncertainty about the ratings to about 1%. Only athletes with estimates over 1500 and whose ratings are reasonably certain are included on this list.