Strength Ranking

Men's Foil, Birth Year 2012

Rank Name Strength Conservative
Estimate*
Cons. Est.*
180-day
Trend
Rating
1 Chen, Hanson 2932 2671 56 A26
2 Zhou, Chenqiao 2913 2606 44 A26
3 He, Haoxuan 3418 2563 948 A26
4 Mazaheri, Fletcher 2675 2417 42 A26
5 Lee, Jaden 2466 2198 20 A25
6 Bedworth, Alistair 2381 2119 205 C26
7 Zhou, Shawn 2372 2118 103 B26
8 Hou, Gaven 2363 2106 40 B25
9 Wang, Elijah (QiChen) 2354 2102 80 B26
10 Yoon, Byungheon 2710 2069 149 E25
11 Liu, Aaron 2366 2065 37 B26
12 Pan, Ethan 2303 2052 72 C26
13 Ge, Felix Fei 2276 2024 22 C26
14 Li, Lucas 2230 1977 57 C26
15 Fukuda, Brando 2223 1969 7 C25
16 Yang, Charles 2211 1957 16 C26
17 Lee, Abin 2180 1929 62 B26
18 Oh, Christopher 2182 1926 1 C26
19 Yu, ShiYu (Henry) 2142 1886 - D25
20 Chang, Jeremy 2121 1872 13 D25
21 Kim, Daniel 2118 1864 105 C25
22 Tang, Royce 2089 1840 29 C26
23 Yee, Colin 2087 1831 20 E26
24 You, Alan 2089 1826 5 D26
25 Jazwinski, Ryan 2067 1817 110 C26
26 Plummer, Waylon 2050 1800 63 B25
27 Czarnecki, Thomas 2045 1794 110 C26
28 Huber, Zion 2788 1793 426 U
29 Bhupathiraju, Arjun 2011 1747 8 D26
30 Yang, Tate 1990 1730 21 E26
31 Kingsley, Griffin 1982 1729 1 D26
32 Leung, Tsun Yin (TY) 2113 1727 127 E26
33 Ganapathi, Eshan 1971 1717 50 C26
34 Grigoriev, Michael 1958 1703 47 E24
35 Hong, Edwin 1937 1686 119 E26
36 Ho, Christopher 1941 1685 8 D25
37 Yu, Eric 2072 1685 - D25
38 YE, Jerry 1930 1677 20 E26
39 Kwong, Zenith (Zeni) 3444 1658 - U
40 wang, sicheng 1904 1647 17 E25
41 Kim, Gene 1955 1642 - D24
42 Tang, Brayden 1932 1642 103 C25
43 Guo, Austin 1882 1619 47 C26
44 Lin, Wilson 1935 1614 509 D26
45 Novikov, Yann 1864 1598 4 E26
46 He, Ian 1848 1594 49 E25
47 Tsui, Raedyn Ho Hin 1832 1578 22 D25
48 Zhao, Jason 1827 1567 67 C25
49 Ryu, Greyson 1842 1566 3 D26
50 Jin, Xuechong Daniel (Daniel) 1793 1535 12 D26
51 Susanto, William 1813 1535 40 D26
52 Alcazaren, Cian 1820 1532 90 E26
53 Kiayias, Alexander 1790 1531 100 A26
54 Kuperberg, Thomas 1832 1524 107 D25
55 Zeng, Albert 1763 1507 13 D25

* The ranking is determined by the conservative estimate of the strength, which reduces uncertainty about the ratings to about 1%. Only athletes with estimates over 1500 and whose ratings are reasonably certain are included on this list.