Strength Ranking

Men's Foil, Birth Year 2005

Rank Name Strength Conservative
Estimate*
Cons. Est.*
180-day
Trend
Rating
1 Chen, Andrew 4093 3836 58 A25
2 Um, Ethan 3876 3616 8 A24
3 Chen, Allen 3872 3611 12 A25
4 Kim, Nicholas 3718 3457 18 A24
5 Burke, Spencer 3533 3275 35 A24
6 Wong, Adam 3549 3250 - A21
7 Huth, Mitchell 3499 3238 8 A25
8 Onik, Elijah 3493 3236 17 A24
9 Singh, Dayaal 3446 3188 10 A22
10 Joseph, Dominic (Dom) 3379 3122 12 A22
11 Hooshi, Dylan 3360 3105 - A21
12 Bagdány, Albert 3980 3103 - A24
13 Vazquez, Zander 3280 3011 3 A22
14 Li, Raphael 3270 3009 - A24
15 Dierks, Kian 3254 2992 12 A23
16 Kwon, Ethan 3247 2992 29 A22
17 Fogelson, Frederick 3240 2985 10 A23
18 Wu, Nicholas 3266 2985 - A23
19 Bae, Kevin 3229 2979 30 A23
20 Muruhin, Yaroslav 3240 2974 1 A21
21 Fukuda, Alessio 3219 2959 - A23
22 Oh, Jonathan 3170 2878 - C21
23 Song, Leonardo 3124 2867 - A22
24 Freedman, Samuel 3046 2788 6 A21
25 SICHITIU, Alexander 3022 2758 - A22
26 DeGroot, Blake 3060 2749 8 A23
27 Nunnink, Phillip 3039 2742 2 A24
28 Costello, Chaissen 2971 2713 9 A24
29 Sung, Chang-Han 2943 2684 - B22
30 SHEN, Zhanyu 3868 2629 2629 E24
31 Nager, Noah 2835 2568 - A22
32 Hobson, Aaron 2796 2535 25 B23
33 Vargas, Bryan 2931 2511 - A24
34 Lovin, Vlad 2774 2500 - B23
35 Fortune, Alexander 2756 2496 - B23
36 Williams, Connor 2764 2491 5 B23
37 Gatza, Logan 2766 2490 2 B21
38 Berk, Theodore 2743 2482 10 B23
39 Lindner, Ruben 3425 2339 - A22
40 Emenheiser, Conrad 2587 2310 8 C24
41 Miller, Aidan 2533 2264 - B24
42 Chi, Alexander 2585 2255 6 C22
43 Davidson, Elliot 2494 2234 27 C25
44 Sigmon, Will 2704 2210 - D24
45 Seal, Maximus 2485 2203 - B24
46 Chen, Boris 2992 2174 - B22
47 Syomichev, Gleb 2426 2145 - B23
48 WU, DING-JUN 2704 2135 - B24
49 Mo, Jason 2427 2129 19 C25
50 Finley, Dylan 2377 2116 56 C24
51 Anderson, Jacob 2431 2111 - C24
52 Iyoki, Kent 2796 2056 - D22
53 Shanks, Aidan 2373 2044 53 C25
54 Garr, James 2403 2044 - C21
55 Ligos, Alex 2313 2038 2 B23
56 Chuang, Kian 2383 2002 - E21

* The ranking is determined by the conservative estimate of the strength, which reduces uncertainty about the ratings to about 1%. Only athletes with estimates over 2000 and whose ratings are reasonably certain are included on this list.