Strength Ranking

Men's Foil, Birth Year 2005

Rank Name Strength Conservative
Estimate*
Cons. Est.*
180-day
Trend
Rating
1 Chen, Andrew 4093 3836 44 A25
2 Um, Ethan 3876 3616 21 A24
3 Chen, Allen 3872 3611 4 A25
4 Kim, Nicholas 3718 3457 18 A24
5 Burke, Spencer 3533 3275 31 A24
6 Wong, Adam 3549 3250 15 A21
7 Huth, Mitchell 3506 3246 13 A25
8 Onik, Elijah 3493 3236 8 A24
9 Singh, Dayaal 3446 3188 10 A22
10 Joseph, Dominic (Dom) 3379 3122 12 A22
11 Hooshi, Dylan 3360 3105 - A21
12 Bagdány, Albert 3980 3103 - A24
13 Vazquez, Zander 3280 3011 3 A22
14 Li, Raphael 3270 3009 - A24
15 Dierks, Kian 3254 2992 23 A23
16 Kwon, Ethan 3247 2992 33 A22
17 Fogelson, Frederick 3240 2985 15 A23
18 Wu, Nicholas 3266 2985 10 A23
19 Bae, Kevin 3229 2979 30 A23
20 Muruhin, Yaroslav 3240 2974 46 A21
21 Oh, Jonathan 3170 2878 - C21
22 Song, Leonardo 3124 2867 - A22
23 Freedman, Samuel 3046 2788 8 A21
24 SICHITIU, Alexander 3022 2758 - A22
25 DeGroot, Blake 3060 2749 8 A23
26 Nunnink, Phillip 3039 2742 4 A24
27 Costello, Chaissen 2971 2713 9 A24
28 Sung, Chang-Han 2943 2684 - B22
29 SHEN, Zhanyu 3868 2629 2629 E24
30 Nager, Noah 2835 2568 5 A22
31 Hobson, Aaron 2796 2535 25 B23
32 Vargas, Bryan 2931 2511 - A24
33 Lovin, Vlad 2774 2500 - B23
34 Fortune, Alexander 2756 2496 - B23
35 Williams, Connor 2764 2491 5 B23
36 Gatza, Logan 2766 2490 2 B21
37 Berk, Theodore 2743 2482 10 B23
38 Lindner, Ruben 3425 2339 - A22
39 Emenheiser, Conrad 2587 2310 8 C24
40 Miller, Aidan 2533 2264 - B24
41 Chi, Alexander 2585 2255 6 C22
42 Sigmon, Will 2704 2210 - D24
43 Davidson, Elliot 2472 2207 - C24
44 Seal, Maximus 2485 2203 - B24
45 Chen, Boris 2992 2174 - B22
46 Syomichev, Gleb 2426 2145 - B23
47 WU, DING-JUN 2704 2135 - B24
48 Mo, Jason 2427 2129 19 C25
49 Finley, Dylan 2389 2127 44 C24
50 Anderson, Jacob 2431 2111 - C24
51 Iyoki, Kent 2796 2056 - D22
52 Shanks, Aidan 2373 2044 53 C25
53 Garr, James 2403 2044 - C21
54 Ligos, Alex 2316 2040 - B23
55 Viveros, Antonio 2357 2012 23 D24
56 Chuang, Kian 2383 2002 - E21

* The ranking is determined by the conservative estimate of the strength, which reduces uncertainty about the ratings to about 1%. Only athletes with estimates over 2000 and whose ratings are reasonably certain are included on this list.