Recruiting Rankings

Strength Ranking

Men's FoilBirth Year 2005

Track the strongest fencers in this class year and compare direct elimination or pool-only strength with a built-in 180-day trend.

Strength leaderboard

Conservative estimates help stabilize the ranking while the trend column shows short-term movement. Search by fencer name and click a numeric heading to sort instantly.

Rank Name Rating
1 Chen, Andrew 4081 3821 - A25
2 Chen, Allen 3887 3625 - A25
3 Um, Ethan 3876 3616 - A24
4 Kim, Nicholas 3696 3434 23 A24
5 Wong, Adam 3549 3250 - A21
6 Onik, Elijah 3496 3244 9 A25
7 Burke, Spencer 3481 3225 38 A24
8 Huth, Mitchell 3450 3191 37 A25
9 Zhang, Andy 3435 3177 - A23
10 Singh, Dayaal 3398 3142 18 A22
11 Joseph, Dominic 3392 3133 - A22
12 Vazquez, Zander 3258 2989 - A22
13 Wu, Nicholas 3266 2985 - A23
14 Dierks, Kian 3221 2961 5 A23
15 Muruhin, Yaroslav 3226 2960 13 A25
16 Fukuda, Alessio 3219 2959 - A23
17 Fogelson, Frederick 3211 2957 - A23
18 Bae, Kevin 3184 2935 3 A23
19 Bagdány, Albert 3702 2918 - A24
20 Oh, Jonathan 3170 2878 - D25
21 Freedman, Samuel 3027 2770 10 B25
22 DeGroot, Blake 3065 2753 - A23
23 Horsley, Alexander 3053 2745 - C25
24 Nunnink, Phillip 3039 2742 - A24
25 SICHITIU, Alexander 3004 2740 18 A22
26 Costello, Chaissen 2940 2681 7 A25
27 PAN, Qiwen 3504 2654 70 B25
28 jittan, daniel 2902 2620 3 A24
29 Hobson, Aaron 2790 2529 6 B23
30 Vargas, Bryan 2931 2511 - A24
31 Fortune, Alexander 2756 2496 - B23
32 Gatza, Logan 2766 2490 - C25
33 Williams, Connor 2760 2487 - B23
34 Berk, Theodore 2743 2482 - B23
35 Emenheiser, Conrad 2677 2412 57 A26
36 Lindner, Ruben 3425 2339 - A22
37 Seal, Maximus 2506 2227 24 B26
38 Kim, Derek 2500 2218 - C23
39 Davidson, Elliot 2473 2212 - C25
40 Chen, Boris 2992 2174 - B22
41 Mo, Jason 2430 2136 7 C26
42 Anderson, Jacob 2432 2112 - C24
43 Finley, Dylan 2351 2092 - C24
44 WU, DING-JUN 2617 2091 4 B25
45 Iyoki, Kent 2796 2056 - D22
46 Ligos, Alex 2318 2044 5 B25
47 Garr, James 2403 2044 - D25
48 Shanks, Aidan 2322 2003 15 C25
49 Chuang, Kian 2383 2002 - U

* The ranking is determined by the conservative estimate of the strength, which reduces uncertainty about the ratings to about 1%. Only athletes with estimates over 2000 and whose ratings are reasonably certain are included on this list.