Recruiting Rankings

Strength Ranking

Men's SabreBirth Year 2006

Track the strongest fencers in this class year and compare direct elimination or pool-only strength with a built-in 180-day trend.

Strength leaderboard

Conservative estimates help stabilize the ranking while the trend column shows short-term movement. Search by fencer name and click a numeric heading to sort instantly.

Rank Name Rating
1 MORRILL, William 3361 3069 2 A25
2 Ji, Cody Walter 3181 2904 53 A26
3 Chon, Taylor 3050 2783 53 A24
4 Yun, Jaesun 3031 2763 4 A23
5 Nazlymov, Andrei 2990 2724 15 A26
6 Jiang, Anthony 2958 2702 - A23
7 Huang, Ethan 2944 2682 12 A25
8 Holz, William 2905 2646 - A23
9 Kogan, Benjamin 2885 2618 - A24
10 Chan, Matthew 2877 2615 - A24
11 Eichhorn, Lukas 2812 2559 16 A23
12 Hjerpe, Wade 2808 2536 26 A25
13 Feng, Leo 2794 2533 9 A24
14 Berrio, Carter 2728 2471 56 A25
15 Kim, Alexander 2723 2465 - A23
16 Robinson, William 2701 2433 5 B25
17 YAO, JINCHENG 2693 2427 13 A23
18 Zubatiy, Samuel 2669 2415 45 A25
19 YAO, JINTAO 2654 2389 7 A23
20 Buchmann, Finn 2635 2385 - B24
21 TENG, MATTHEW 2613 2361 58 A23
22 Won, Taeyoung 3023 2325 - A25
23 Pan, Alex 2571 2321 13 B23
24 Lo, Konnor 2557 2310 - B23
25 Fisic, Vasilije 2850 2299 33 D25
26 Stone, Esmond 2544 2295 - B22
27 Glozman, Justin 2529 2280 - C25
28 Sagardi, David 2728 2272 - C25
29 Depew, Spencer 2495 2245 - B24
30 Morales, Jonathan 2502 2243 16 A24
31 Maklin, Edward 2490 2241 42 A24
32 Waxler, Seth 2471 2215 14 C22
33 Han, Edward 2415 2159 36 C24
34 Lee, Heeseong 2984 2152 - B25
35 Savoy, Luca 2401 2144 - C23
36 Rosberg, Dashiell 2383 2130 - B23
37 May, Griffin 2379 2125 - C23
38 Tiagi, Daniel 2376 2125 - A26
39 Medvedev, Michail 2372 2124 - B22
40 Jeffry, Christian 2440 2121 36 E26
41 Hoppa, Luke 2370 2112 - C24
42 Huang, Connor 2344 2091 - C23
43 Penswater, John 2493 2086 90 C26
44 Fields, Matthew 2320 2073 - A25
45 Kakehi, Nicholas 2302 2046 - C22
46 Bukowski, Broghan 2277 2027 - C24
47 Ganascia-Lin, Guillaume 2467 2022 127 A25
48 Zhang, William 2283 2007 - D23

* The ranking is determined by the conservative estimate of the strength, which reduces uncertainty about the ratings to about 1%. Only athletes with estimates over 2000 and whose ratings are reasonably certain are included on this list.