Recruiting Rankings

Strength Ranking

Women's SabreBirth Year 2012

Track the strongest fencers in this class year and compare direct elimination or pool-only strength with a built-in 180-day trend.

Strength leaderboard

Conservative estimates help stabilize the ranking while the trend column shows short-term movement. Search by fencer name and click a numeric heading to sort instantly.

Rank Name Rating
1 Jiang, Evelyn 2975 2707 23 A26
2 Choi, Charlotte 2693 2441 171 A26
3 Xu, Yiyun 2823 2337 105 A25
4 Long, Jessie 2417 2168 52 A26
5 Kim, Saeren 2404 2155 12 A26
6 Zhao, Selena 2387 2135 182 B26
7 Gong, Joy 2384 2131 40 A26
8 Wang, Tina 2337 2077 90 B25
9 Ren, Katherine 2302 2054 90 A26
10 Sung, Olivia 2298 2044 40 B25
11 Park, Chloe 2267 2018 187 B26
12 Yu, Stella 2248 1996 41 B26
13 Baboldashtian, Rosegol 2270 1994 54 C26
14 Xu, Elaine 2230 1981 49 A26
15 Heath, Isabella 2233 1979 110 A25
16 zhu, Avril 2206 1956 10 C25
17 Duff, Caitlin 2137 1882 169 B26
18 Majewska, Maria 2129 1873 162 B26
19 Chang, Kaitlyn 2135 1873 166 A26
20 Ye, Isabella 2148 1863 33 C26
21 Sun, Yi 2184 1856 13 B25
22 Hu, Alicia 2157 1855 38 C26
23 Lai, Karen 2111 1850 34 B26
24 Ferris, Madeline 2124 1838 94 B26
25 Yu, Skylar 2076 1829 62 B26
26 Laureyns, Ainsley 2079 1826 91 C26
27 Ko, Ariel 2059 1804 179 C26
28 Chowdhery, Myra 2046 1791 10 B25
29 Mak, Jayden 2030 1775 41 C26
30 Hu, Heidi 2004 1750 45 D26
31 Chau, Zoey 2054 1737 392 B26
32 Wang, JiaQi 1970 1722 22 C26
33 John, Sophia 1963 1707 95 B26
34 Pereira, Izumi 1956 1705 136 A26
35 Zhang, Ashley 1939 1695 36 C26
36 WANG, MONA 1959 1695 57 C26
37 Nguyen, Summer 1925 1667 7 C26
38 Zheng, Winona 1941 1636 52 B26
39 Young, Sienna 1888 1633 20 C25
40 Munshi, Ridhima 1935 1629 47 E25
41 Chang, Kylie 1994 1621 52 U
42 Rostholder, Hannah 1877 1617 8 D26
43 Cai, Joanna 1859 1607 81 E26
44 Li, Tiffany 1852 1566 16 D25
45 Zhang, Audrey 1835 1560 33 C25
46 DIMAPILIS, JHEAVEN 1841 1556 167 D26
47 Ta-Zhou, Sophia 1790 1538 15 D26
48 Kim, Grace 1800 1530 38 C25
49 Olesky, Ellie 1807 1527 25 U

* The ranking is determined by the conservative estimate of the strength, which reduces uncertainty about the ratings to about 1%. Only athletes with estimates over 1500 and whose ratings are reasonably certain are included on this list.