Recruiting Rankings

Strength Ranking

Women's SabreBirth Year 2012

Track the strongest fencers in this class year and compare direct elimination or pool-only strength with a built-in 180-day trend.

Strength leaderboard

Conservative estimates help stabilize the ranking while the trend column shows short-term movement. Search by fencer name and click a numeric heading to sort instantly.

Rank Name Rating
1 Jiang, Evelyn 2975 2707 25 A26
2 Choi, Charlotte 2693 2441 181 A26
3 Xu, Yiyun 2823 2337 105 A26
4 Long, Jessie 2417 2168 16 A26
5 Kim, Saeren 2404 2155 16 A26
6 Zhao, Selena 2387 2135 188 B26
7 Gong, Joy 2384 2131 42 A26
8 Wang, Tina 2337 2077 58 B26
9 Ren, Katherine 2302 2054 98 A26
10 Sung, Olivia 2298 2044 35 B25
11 Park, Chloe 2267 2019 107 A26
12 Yu, Stella 2248 1996 16 B26
13 Baboldashtian, Rosegol 2270 1994 40 B26
14 Xu, Elaine 2230 1981 58 A26
15 Heath, Isabella 2233 1979 62 A25
16 zhu, Avril 2206 1956 10 C25
17 Duff, Caitlin 2137 1882 91 B26
18 Majewska, Maria 2129 1873 153 A26
19 Chang, Kaitlyn 2135 1873 104 A26
20 Hu, Alicia 2169 1868 33 C26
21 Ye, Isabella 2149 1863 15 C26
22 Sun, Yi 2184 1856 13 B25
23 Lai, Karen 2111 1851 8 B26
24 Ferris, Madeline 2124 1838 93 B26
25 Yu, Skylar 2076 1829 74 B26
26 Laureyns, Ainsley 2079 1826 112 C26
27 Ko, Ariel 2059 1804 131 C26
28 Chowdhery, Myra 2046 1791 1 B25
29 Mak, Jayden 2030 1775 21 C26
30 Hu, Heidi 2004 1750 32 D26
31 Chau, Zoey 2054 1737 307 B26
32 Wang, JiaQi 1970 1722 22 C26
33 John, Sophia 1963 1707 74 B26
34 Pereira, Izumi 1956 1705 138 A26
35 Zhang, Ashley 1939 1695 11 C26
36 WANG, MONA 1959 1695 47 C26
37 Nguyen, Summer 1925 1667 13 C26
38 Zheng, Winona 1941 1637 52 B26
39 Young, Sienna 1888 1633 8 C26
40 Munshi, Ridhima 1935 1629 33 E25
41 Chang, Kylie 1994 1621 19 U
42 Rostholder, Hannah 1877 1617 17 D26
43 Cai, Joanna 1859 1607 66 E26
44 Li, Tiffany 1852 1566 - D25
45 Zhang, Audrey 1835 1560 52 C25
46 DIMAPILIS, JHEAVEN 1841 1556 167 B26
47 Ta-Zhou, Sophia 1790 1538 15 D26
48 Kim, Grace 1800 1530 28 C25
49 Olesky, Ellie 1807 1527 9 U

* The ranking is determined by the conservative estimate of the strength, which reduces uncertainty about the ratings to about 1%. Only athletes with estimates over 1500 and whose ratings are reasonably certain are included on this list.