Rank | Name | Strength |
Conservative Estimate* Cons. Est.* |
180-day Trend |
Rating |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Shoman, Jenna | 3796 | 3533 | 70 | A23 |
2 | Mika, Veronica | 3431 | 3175 | 8 | A23 |
3 | Freedman, Janna | 3341 | 3085 | 11 | A23 |
4 | Engelman-Sanz, Madeline | 3287 | 3031 | 21 | A23 |
5 | Hild, Nisha | 3234 | 2979 | 67 | A23 |
6 | Wiggers, Susan | 3167 | 2899 | - | A22 |
7 | Shearer, Natalie | 3150 | 2879 | 22 | A23 |
8 | Vadasz, Ibla | 3092 | 2839 | 37 | A22 |
9 | Erikson, Kira | 3063 | 2808 | 59 | A23 |
10 | Chin, Sophia | 3053 | 2794 | 33 | B23 |
11 | Duckett, Madison | 2958 | 2697 | 33 | A22 |
12 | Li, Amanda | 2941 | 2686 | 43 | A21 |
13 | Yang, Ashley | 2936 | 2679 | 4 | B23 |
14 | Alcebar, Kayla | 2931 | 2672 | 40 | B22 |
15 | Yang, Angelina LeLe | 2926 | 2655 | 66 | A23 |
16 | Shi, Cathleen | 2902 | 2640 | 7 | A23 |
17 | Ferreira, Alejandra | 2865 | 2545 | - | C23 |
18 | Sourimto, Valeria | 2806 | 2539 | 8 | B23 |
19 | Sinha, Anika | 2786 | 2530 | 15 | B23 |
20 | Hung, Anna | 2798 | 2526 | 25 | B22 |
21 | Lee, Sophia | 2713 | 2455 | 32 | A23 |
22 | Chen, Ashley | 2762 | 2452 | 6 | A23 |
23 | Balakumaran, Maya | 2712 | 2450 | 10 | B22 |
24 | Nathanson, Sammy | 2729 | 2448 | 26 | A22 |
25 | Graff, Sophie | 2711 | 2439 | 27 | C22 |
26 | Altheimer, Holly | 3792 | 2399 | - | E23 |
27 | Wei, Vivian | 2652 | 2383 | 9 | B22 |
28 | Mansperger, Leena | 2656 | 2368 | 28 | B22 |
29 | Yuan, Greta | 2620 | 2365 | 4 | B23 |
30 | Scott, Eve | 2602 | 2337 | 3 | B23 |
31 | Ligh, Erenei | 2600 | 2333 | 14 | C23 |
32 | Johnson, Lydia | 2578 | 2277 | 26 | C23 |
33 | Obradovic, Ana | 2546 | 2268 | 11 | C23 |
34 | Barnovitz, Maya | 2507 | 2235 | 8 | B23 |
35 | Mulagari, Sadhika | 2501 | 2184 | 2 | A22 |
36 | Procaccini, Ashten | 2687 | 2163 | - | U |
37 | Tong, Jessie | 2352 | 2080 | 64 | B22 |
38 | Fan, Grace | 2350 | 2063 | 72 | C23 |
39 | Yen, Natalie | 2492 | 2059 | - | U |
40 | Chang, Audrey | 2341 | 2033 | - | C23 |
41 | Ren, Xinling | 2293 | 2014 | 4 | D21 |
* The ranking is determined by the conservative estimate of the strength, which reduces uncertainty about the ratings to about 1%. Only athetes with estimates over 2000 and whose ratings are reasonably certain are included on this list.