Strength Ranking

Women's Sabre, Birth Year 2011

Rank Name Strength Conservative
Estimate* Cons. Est.* 		180-day
Trend		 Rating
1 Jeon, Yuju 3383 2852 16 A25
2 Wang, Yixuan 3272 2751 574 A25
3 Gay, Sasha 2601 2342 37 A25
4 Leou, Korina 2579 2330 47 A25
5 Lin, Elaine 2521 2270 59 A24
6 Kang, Ellie 2503 2247 94 A24
7 Cong, Anne 2453 2203 49 A25
8 Lei, Zitong (Meya) 2413 2161 79 A25
9 Yuen, Nicole 2401 2147 42 B25
10 Xiao, Cindy 2371 2109 161 B25
11 Gaikwad, Ashmiee 2319 2067 50 C25
12 Fan, Alexandria 2322 2063 45 B25
13 Ku, Alathea-Joy 2289 2037 93 B25
14 Foss, Persephone 2282 2029 86 B24
15 Gonzalez, Veronika 2270 2017 30 B25
16 Liu, kai yin aria 2265 2017 88 B25
17 Zhou, Yingxiao 3266 2016 - U
18 Dhar, Rana 2234 1971 101 A25
19 Kwon, Hannah 2233 1966 39 A25
20 Zou, Yuyan 2844 1963 - U
21 Fung, Iris 2205 1955 15 B24
22 Kaul, Tara 2220 1946 34 C25
23 Castelo, Soleil 2183 1935 60 B25
24 Wang, Xinlei 3120 1927 - U
25 Kwon, Ava 2156 1907 11 C24
26 Wong, Natalie 2149 1887 12 C25
27 ZHAO, ZEMEI 2460 1858 490 U
28 Raghuraman, Anishka 2130 1839 50 C25
29 Niu, Jessica 2067 1816 24 C24
30 meyerson, Michelle 2068 1813 8 D25
31 Sung, Isabella 2071 1807 18 D25
32 Zhu, Elaine 2111 1786 4 D24
33 Sengupta, Jia 2044 1784 28 U
34 Tong, Laurie 2035 1779 10 C25
35 Zhu, Alina 2089 1772 - D24
36 Mishev, Lila 1987 1717 22 E25
37 Hsieh, Lucia 1991 1714 51 D25
38 Muthappan, Sahana 1953 1675 67 U
39 Huang, Pierra 1929 1664 134 C25
40 Chang, Annette 1943 1662 45 D25
41 Dolev, Rony 1944 1659 3 D25
42 Hwang, Charlotte 1923 1658 171 D25
43 Yang, Caroline 1937 1656 67 D25
44 Wu, Daisy 1987 1653 36 D24
45 Ku, Chloe 1935 1618 54 D24
46 Harris, Julia 2457 1612 - U
47 Cheron, Helene 1878 1609 62 D25
48 Liu, Chelsea 1907 1588 38 D25
49 Nanda, Maanika 1840 1581 94 D25
50 Park, Haylie 1825 1573 18 D25
51 Biesiada, Sophia 1874 1564 25 E25
52 Yadav, Tishya 1804 1524 178 D25
53 Lin, Ariel 1840 1524 32 E25
54 Konzen, Iris 1810 1523 36 U
55 gong, suri 1879 1518 - U
56 Bandhu, Saahiti 1796 1518 35 E25

* The ranking is determined by the conservative estimate of the strength, which reduces uncertainty about the ratings to about 1%. Only athletes with estimates over 1500 and whose ratings are reasonably certain are included on this list.