| Rank | Name | Strength |
Conservative Estimate* Cons. Est.* |
180-day Trend |
Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tsui, Natalie | 3212 | 2956 | 130 | A25 |
| 2 | Xiao, julie | 3182 | 2923 | 5 | A25 |
| 3 | McKee, Brynnley | 3112 | 2859 | 139 | A25 |
| 4 | So, Catelyn | 2845 | 2591 | 19 | A25 |
| 5 | Tabangay, Heartlyn | 2837 | 2577 | 20 | A24 |
| 6 | Shi, Julia | 2852 | 2575 | 5 | A24 |
| 7 | Tse, Angelina | 2819 | 2561 | 18 | A25 |
| 8 | Lauri, Keira | 2775 | 2518 | 192 | A25 |
| 9 | Jeong, Katie | 2709 | 2456 | 65 | A24 |
| 10 | Wang, Gloria Ruoyan | 2735 | 2451 | 31 | A24 |
| 11 | Lim, Jaslene | 2675 | 2420 | 50 | A24 |
| 12 | Mund, Ruth | 2658 | 2403 | 12 | B24 |
| 13 | Maklin, Sofia | 2654 | 2398 | 31 | A24 |
| 14 | Mann, Sophia | 2605 | 2353 | 24 | B25 |
| 15 | Liu, Sydney | 2591 | 2342 | 18 | B24 |
| 16 | Lin, Nicole | 2597 | 2333 | 4 | A23 |
| 17 | Kondev, Elizabeth | 2548 | 2290 | 19 | A23 |
| 18 | Attia, Jasmine | 2543 | 2286 | 61 | A25 |
| 19 | Kohlberger, Noelle | 2732 | 2280 | - | E24 |
| 20 | KOUROUSI, ANNA KALLIOPI | 2887 | 2220 | - | A24 |
| 21 | Yam, Danika | 2465 | 2204 | 26 | C24 |
| 22 | Pabian, Emilia | 2464 | 2200 | 5 | B23 |
| 23 | Huchwajda, Pola | 2580 | 2189 | 46 | C23 |
| 24 | Spears, Mya B | 2438 | 2181 | 8 | C25 |
| 25 | zhang, Chenfei | 2449 | 2181 | 18 | B24 |
| 26 | Dang, Kelia | 2427 | 2167 | 23 | C25 |
| 27 | Dong, Angel | 2430 | 2164 | 33 | B25 |
| 28 | Huang, Rachael | 2406 | 2148 | 12 | B24 |
| 29 | Buhay, Kirsten | 2395 | 2141 | 55 | C23 |
| 30 | Chen, Kevy | 2381 | 2124 | 14 | D23 |
| 31 | Zoller, Noelle | 2381 | 2122 | 57 | A25 |
| 32 | Yu, Holly | 2406 | 2108 | 20 | B23 |
| 33 | Medvinsky, Alexandra | 2353 | 2095 | 30 | C24 |
| 34 | Tan, Adelyn | 2342 | 2083 | 39 | C24 |
| 35 | Guven, Coco | 2319 | 2067 | 31 | B24 |
| 36 | NAMBIAR, GEETA MAHESH | 2952 | 2042 | - | E24 |
| 37 | Chung, Hailey | 2478 | 2021 | 24 | C24 |
| 38 | Xie, Nora | 2273 | 2013 | 8 | B24 |
| 39 | Schaible, Sofia | 2258 | 2009 | 88 | C25 |
* The ranking is determined by the conservative estimate of the strength, which reduces uncertainty about the ratings to about 1%. Only athletes with estimates over 2000 and whose ratings are reasonably certain are included on this list.